___

• Büyüközkan, G., Güleryüz, S. (2017). Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey Using an Integrated MCDM Approach with Linguistic Interval Fuzzy Preference Relations. Energy, 123, 149-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.137
• Chang, D.Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649– 655.
• Chang, H.W. and Hsieh, H.N. (2013). Recreational cycling routes investment selection-Hsinchu Technopolis case by applying ZOGP. J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud., 10, 1227-1242.
• Çelikbilek, Y., Tüysüz, F. (2016). An Integrated Grey Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for the Evaluation of Renewable Energy Sources. Energy, 115, 1246-1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.091
• Ertay, T., Kahraman, C., Kaya, I. (2013). Evaluation of Renewable Energy Alternatives Using MACBETH and Fuzzy AHP Multicriteria Methods: The Case of Turkey. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(1), 38-62. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.762950.
• Göktürk, İ., Eryılmaz, A., Yörür, B., Yuluğkural, Y. (2011). Bir İşletmenin Tedarikçi Değerlendirme Ve Seçim Probleminin Çözümünde AAS Ve VIKOR Yöntemlerinin Kullanılması. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Fen Bilmleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı 25.
• Karaman, B. ve Çerçioğlu, H. (2015). 0-1 hedef programlama destekli bütünleşik Ahp–Vikor yöntemi: Hastane yatırımı projeleri. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(4), 567-576. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/262287
• Kumar, S. (2006). Integrated Project evaluation and selection using multiple attribute decision-making technique. International Journal of Production Economics, 103 (1), 90-103.
• Macharis, C. and Bernardini, A. (2015). Reviewing the use of multi-criteria decision analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: Time for a multi-actor approach. Transp. Policy, 37, 177-186.
• Macura, D., Boškovi´c, B., Bojovi´c, N. and Milenkovi´c, M. (2011). A model for prioritization of rail infrastructure projects using ANP. Int. J. Transp. Econ., 38, 285-309.Maxim, A. (2014). Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation Technologies Using Weighted Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Energy Policy, 65, 284-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.059
• Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G.H. (2004). Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: a Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156, 445-455.
• Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G.H. (2007). Extended VIKOR Method in Comparison with Other Outranking Methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178, 514-529.
• Stojcetovic, B., Nikolic, D., Velinov, V., Bogdanovic, D. (2016). Application of İntegrated Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methodology to Renewable Energy Project Selection in Serbia. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 8(3), 035906. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4950950
• Uçakçıoğlu, B. ve Eren, T. (2017). Hava Savunma Sanayinde Yatırım Projelerinin Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme ve Hedef Programlama ile Seçimi. Journal of Aviation, 1(2), 39-63. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/386295
• Uysal, F. (2011), “Türkiye'de Yenilenebilir Enerji Alternatiflerinin Seçimi için Graf Teori Ve Matris Yaklaşım.”, Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi, 13, 23. http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/94939
• Van Laarhoven, P.J.M. and Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229-241.
• Wang, B. (2018). Constructability analysis of monorail project. Pre-Project Planning & Constructablility Analysis. http://www.123seminarsonly.com/Seminar-Reports/2014-03/129660992-Constructability- Analysis-of-Monorail-Project.pdf.
• Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Fouladgar, M.M., Zavadskas, E.K., Moini, S. H.H. (2013). Selecting the Optimal Renewable Energy Using Multi Criteria Decision Making. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 14(5), 957-978. doi:10.3846/16111699.2013.766257