Analitik ağ süreci yöntemi üzerine bulanık bilgi aksiyomu açılımı
Analitik Ağ Süreci yöntemi uygulamalarında alternatif sayısının belirli bir sınırı aşması durumunda karar modeli çıktılarının tutarlılığında belirgin sapmalar görülmektedir. Bu çalışma söz konusu sorunun aşılmasını hedeflemiştir. Analitik Ağ Süreci yöntemi üzerine bilgi aksiyomu açılımı olarak önerilen melez bir yaklaşımla karar ölçütleri ağırlıklandırılırken; bilgi aksiyomu yöntemi ile alternatifler değerlendirilmektedir. Önerilen yaklaşımın alternatif sayısının fazla olduğu ve ölçütler arası ilişkilerin mevcut olduğu karar verme problemlerinin çözümüne katkı sağlaması beklenmektedir.
Extension of fuzzy information axiom based on analytic network process
In Analytic Network Process (ANP) applications, significant deviations are observed in the consistency of the decision model outcomes when the number of alternatives exceeds a predetermined value. This study aims at overcoming this problem. Using the hybrid approach which is proposed as information axioms extension on ANP, the decision attributes are weighed via ANP while information axioms evaluate the alternatives. The proposed approach is expected to contribute the solution of decision-making problems which have a great number of alternatives and existence of dependencies among attributes.
___
- 1. Çebi, S., Çelik, M. 2008. “Denizcilik İşletmeleri Yönetimi MBA Programı Yapılandırılması İçin Bulanık Aksiyomatik Tasarım Yönetimi Tabanlı Karar Destek Sistemi Önerisi”, 2.Ulusal Sistem Mühendisliği Kongresi, 6-8 Şubat, İstanbul.
- 2. Çelik, M., Çebi, S., Kahraman, C., Er, I.D. 2009a. “An Integrated Fuzzy QFD Model Proposal on Routing of Shipping Investment Decisions in Crude Oil Tanker Market”, Expert Systems With Applications. Baskıda.
- 3. Çelik, M., Cebi, S., Kahraman, C., Er, D. 2009b. “Application of Axiomatic Design and Topsis Methodologies Under Fuzzy Environment For Proposing Competitive Strategies on Turkish Container Ports in Maritime Transportation Network”, Expert Systems With Applications. Baskıda.
- 4. Çelik, M., Er, I.D., Topcu, Y.I. 2009. “Computer-based Systematic Execution Model on Human Resources Management in Maritime Transportation Industry: The Case of Master Selection For Embarking on Board Merchant Ships”, Expert Systems With Applications. 36, (2) part 1, 1048-1060.
- 5. Çelik, M., Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Er, I.D. 2009c. “Fuzzy Axiomatic Design-based Performance Evaluation Model For Docking Facilities in Shipbuilding Industry: The Case of Turkish Shipyards”, Expert Systems With Applications. Baskıda.
- 6. Chung, S.H., Lee, A.H.I., Pearn, W.L. 2005. “Analytic Network Process (ANP) Approach For Product Mix Planning in Semiconductor Fabricator”, International Journal of Production Economics, 96 (1), 15-36.
- 7. Gencer, C., Gürpınar, D. 2007. “Analytic Network Process in Supplier Selection: A Case Study in an Electronic Firm”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 31 (11), 2475- 2486.
- 8. Guitouni, A., Martel, J.M. 1998. “Tentative Guidelines to Help Choosing an Appropriate MCDA Method”, European Journal of Operational Research, 109(2), 501- 521.
- 9. Kahraman, C., Cebi, S. 2009. “A New Multi-attribute Decision Making Method: Hierarchical Fuzzy Axiomatic Design”, Expert Systems With Applications. Baskıda.
- 10. Kulak, O., Kahraman, C. 2005a. “Multi-attribute Comparison of Advanced Manufacturing Systems Using Fuzzy vs. Crisp Axiomatic Design Approach”, International Journal of Production Economics, 95, 415-424.
- 11. Kulak, O., Kahraman, C. 2005b. “Fuzzy Multi-attribute Selection Among Transportation Companies Using Axiomatic Design and Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Information Sciences, 170, 191-210.
- 12. Kulak, O. 2005. “A Decision Support System For Fuzzy Multi-attribute Selection of Material Handling Equipments”, Expert Systems with Applications, 29( 2), 310- 319.
- 13. Kulak, O., Durmuşoğlu, M.B., Kahraman, C. 2005. “Fuzzy Multi-attribute Equipment Selection Based on Information Axiom”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 169, 337-345.
- 14. Meade, L.M., Presley, A. 2002. “R&D Project Selection Using the Analytic Network Process”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), 59-66.
- 15. Ölçer, A.İ., Odabaşı, A.Y. 2005. “A New Fuzzy Multiple Attributive Group Decision Making Methodology and its Application to Propulsion/manoeuvring System Selection Problem”, European Journal of Operational Research, 166 (2005), 93–114.
- 16. Saaty, T.L. 1996. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
- 17. Suh, N.P. 1990. The Principles of Design. Oxford University Press, New York.
- 18. Suh, N.P. 2001. Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications. Oxford University Press, New York.
- 19. Yurdakul, M., 2003. “Measuring Long-term Performance of a Manufacturing Firm Using the Analytical Network Process (ANP) Approach”, International Journal of Production Research, 41(11), 2501-2529.
- 20. Wei, W.L., Chang, W. 2008. “Analytic Network Processbased Model for Selecting an Optimal Product Design Solution with Zero-One Goal Programming”, Journal of Engineering Design, 19 (1), 15-44.
- ISSN: 1300-3410
- Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
- Başlangıç: 1989
- Yayıncı: TMMOB MAKİNA MÜHENDİSLERİ ODASI