A new perspective to design education in industrial engineering: Product design projects at freshman

Tasarım felsefesinin mühendislik eğitiminin ilk yıllarında verilmesi, öğrencilerin lisans programında gördükleri çeşitli kavramların/yöntemlerin mühendislik tasarımı ile ilgili problemlere nasıl çözüm getirdiğini anlamaları bakımından büyük önem taşımaktadır. Bir sistem ve insan mühendisliği olan endüstri mühendisliği, profesyonel anlamda fiziksel ürün tasarımından çok sistem tasarımına yönelik çalışmalar yapmaktadır. Bu nedenle endüstri mühendisliğinde tasarım eğitimi daha çok sistem tasarımına yönelik projeler/uygulamalar ile gerçekleştirilmektedir. Bu makalede yenilikçi bir yaklaşımla geliştirilen ve endüstri mühendisliği bölümü birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin ürün tasarımına yönelik açık uçlu projeler yaptığı tasarım dersi anlatılmakta ve bu dersin yedi yıllık uygulaması ile ilgili değerlendirmeler sunulmaktadır

Endüstri mühendisliğinde tasarım eğitimi için yeni bir yaklaşım: Birinci sınıflar için ürün tasarım projeleri

This paper describes an introductory project-based engineering design course for the industrial engineering freshman students. An innovative approach is preferred in this course and students in the form of design teams are required to design and construct working prototypes for predefined “physical products”. This course brings a new perspective to the industrial engineering education, which is mainly focused on designing “systems” rather than “physical products”. It is argued that this “product design” experience improves understanding of the industrial engineering students “systems approach” at an early level and provides students with a strong foundation on designing systems in the future.

___

  • 1. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commision, (2007), “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs”, accessed at http://www.abet.org as of April 8, 2008.
  • 2. Asbjornsen, O.A. and Hamann, R.J., (2000), “Toward a Unified Systems Engineering Education”, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part C, 30(2), 175-182.
  • 3. Dekker, D., (1995), “Engineering Design Processes, Problem Solving and Creativity”, Proc. of the 1995 Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol. 1, 3a5.16-3a5.19.
  • 4. Delson, N. J., (2001), “Increasing Team Motivation in Engineering Design Courses, Int. Journal of Engineering Education, 17(4 and 5), 359-366.
  • 5. Dym, C.L. et al., (2005), “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching and Learning”, Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120.
  • 6. Dym, C.L., (1994) “Teaching Design to Freshman: Style and Content”, Journal of Engineering Education, 83(4), 303-310.
  • 7. Dym, C.L., (2004), “Design, Systems and Engineering Education”, Int. Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 305-312.
  • 8. Eder, W.E. and Hubka, V., (2005), “Curriculum, Pedagogics and Didactics for Design Education”, Journal of Engineering Design, 16(1), 45-61.
  • 9. Erden A., Erkmen A., Erkmen İ., Bucinell R. B., Traver C., Notash L., (2000), “The Multidisciplinary International Virtual Design Studio (MIVDS)”, IEEE Transactions on Education, 43(3), 288-295.
  • 10. Hyman, B.L., (2001), “From Capstone to Cornerstone: A New Paradigm for Design Education”, Int. Journal of Engineering Education, 17(4 and 5), 416-420.
  • 11. Little, P. and King, J., (2001), “Selection Criteria for Cornerstone and Capstone Design Projects, Int. Journal of Engineering Education, 17(4), 406-409.
  • 12. Marra, R.M., Palmer, B. and Litzinger, T.A., (2000), “The Effects of a First-Year Engineering Design Course on Student Intellectual Development as Measured by the Perry Scheme”, Journal of Engineering Education, 89(1), 39-45.
  • 13. McNamara, C. (1997) “Systems Thinking”, accessed at http://www.managementhelp.org/ systems/systems.htm as of March 24, 2008.
  • 14. Noble, J.S., (1998), “An Approach for Engineering Curriculum Integration in Capstone Design Courses”, Int. Journal of Engineering Education, 14(3), 197-203.
  • 15. Pugh, S., (1991), Total Design, Addison Wesley, New York, NY.
  • 16. Turner, W.C. et al., (1993), Introduction to Industrial and Systems Engineering, Prentice Hall.