SANAL SOSYAL DESTEK ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN TÜRK KÜLTÜRÜNE UYARLANMASI

Bu araştırmanın amacı Nick, Cole, Cho, Smith, Carter ve Zelkowitz (2018) tarafından geliştirilen Sanal SosyalDestek Ölçeği’ni Türkçe’ye uyarlamak, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarını yapmaktır. Araştırmada çalışmagrubu olarak Akdeniz bölgesinde yer alan bir üniversitenin eğitim fakültesinde öğrenim gören 340 öğrenciyle(242 kız, 98 erkek) çalışılmıştır. Sanal Sosyal Destek Ölçeği’nin yapı geçerliğinin incelenmesi amacıyladoğrulayıcı faktör analizi uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen model uyum indeksleri ölçeğin kabul edilebilir düzeydeuyum verdiğini göstermektedir. Ölçeğin Cronbach Alfa iç tutarlılık güvenirlik katsayısı .96 olarak bulunmuştur.Ölçeğin orijinal yapıdaki gibi 40 maddeden ve “duygusal destek”, “sosyal arkadaşlık”, “bilgi desteği” ve“araçsal destek” olmak üzere dört alt boyuttan oluştuğu gözlenmiştir. Ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlik için yapılananalizlere göre ölçeğin sanal ortamdaki sosyallik ile pozitif yönde anlamlı ilişkiye (r=.62, p

ADAPTATION OF ONLINE SOCIAL SUPPORT SCALE TO TURKISH CULTURE

The aim of this research is to adapt the Online Social Support Scale developed by Nick, Cole, Cho, Smith, Carter and Zelkowitz (2018) to Turkish, and to make validity and reliability studies. In the study, 340 students (242 girls, 98 boys) studying in the education faculty of a university in the Mediterranean region of Turkey were studied as a working group. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to examine the structure validity of the Online Social Support Scale. The model fit indices show that the scale is acceptable. Cronbach Alpha internal consistency reliability coefficient of the scale was found as .96. It was observed that the scale consisted of 40 items as in the original structure and four sub-dimensions as "emotional support", "social friendship", "information support" and "instrumental support". According to the analyses conducted for criterion-related validity, the scale was found to have a positive significant relationship with sociality in the online environment (r= .62, p

PDF

___

Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
Burke, M., & Kraut, R. E. (2014). Growing closer on Facebook: Changes in tie strength through social network site use. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557094
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi: Ankara.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Şekercioğlu, G., & Çokluk, Ö. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Birinci Baskı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Chen, W., & Choi, A. S. K. (2011). Internet and social support among Chinese migrants in Singapore. New Media and Society, 13(7), 1067–1084. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810396311.
Chou, H. T. G., & Edge, N. (2012). “They are happier and having better lives than I am”: The impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others' lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 117-121. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0324
Cole, D., Nick, E., Zelkowitz, R., Roeder, K., & Spinelli, T. (2017). Online social support for young people: Does it recapitulate in-person social support; can it help? Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 456-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.058
Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Donath, J. (2007). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00394.x
Eker, D., Arkar, H., & Yaldız, H. (2001). Çok boyutlu algılanan sosyal destek ölçeğinin gözden geçirilmiş formunun faktör yapısı, geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 12(1),17-25.
Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015). Social comparisons on social media: The impact of Facebook on young women's body image concerns and mood. Body image, 13, 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.12.002
Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2015). Toward an integrated and differential approach to the relationships between loneliness, different types of Facebook use, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Communication Research, Advance online publication, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215617506
Gilmour, J., Machin, T., Brownlow, C., & Jeffries, C. (2019). Facebook-based social support and health: A systematic review. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000246
Global Digital (2019). https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2019-turkey adresinden 20 Mart 2019 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
Hayes, R. A., Carr, C. T., & Wohn, D. Y. (2016). One click, many meanings: Interpreting paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 60(1), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127248
Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Information Communication and Society, 8(2), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500146185
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Evaluating model fit: A synthesis of the structural equation modelling literature. In 7th European Conference on research methodology for business and management studies. London.
Huang, H. Y. (2016). Examining the beneficial effects of individual’s self-disclosure on the social network site. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.030
Kocaayan, F. & Özdemir, S. (2019, Nisan). Gelişen iletişim ortamları ve sosyal destek: Sanal sosyal destek [Tam Metin]. V. Human and Civilization Congress From Past To Future, Alanya, Türkiye.
Korkmaz, Ö., Usta, E., & Kurt, İ. (2014). Sanal ortam yalnızlık ölçeği (SOYÖ) geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(29-2), 144- 159.
Lee, K. T., Noh, M. J., & Koo, D. M. (2013). Lonely people are no longer lonely on social networking sites: The mediating role of self-disclosure and social support. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(6), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0553
Liu, C., & Yu, C. (2013). Can Facebook use induce well-being? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(9), 674–679. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0301
Liu, D., Wright, K. B., & Hu, B. (2018). A meta-analysis of social network site use and social support. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.024
Lu, W., & Hampton, K. N. (2017). Beyond the power of networks: Differentiating network structure from social media affordances for perceived social support. New Media and Society, 19(6), 861–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815621514
Luo, M., & Hancock, J. T. (2020). Self-disclosure and social media: motivations, mechanisms and psychological well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.019
Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2003). Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in human behavior, 19(6), 659-671.
Nabi, R. L., Prestin, A., & So, J. (2013). Facebook friends with (health) benefits? Exploring social network site use and perceptions of social support, stress, and well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(10), 721–727. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0521
Nick, E. A., Cole, D. A., Cho, S. J., Smith, D. K., Carter, T. G., & Zelkowitz, R. L. (2018). The online social support scale: Measure development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 30(9), 1127–1143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000558
Park, J., Lee, D. S., Shablack, H., Verduyn, P., Deldin, P., Ybarra, O., … Kross, E. (2016). When perceptions defy reality: The relationships between depression and actual and perceived Facebook social support. Journal of Affective Disorders, 200, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.048
Pornsakulvanich, V. (2017). Personality, attitudes, social influences, and social networking site usage predicting online social support. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.021
Reich, S. M., Subrahmanyam, K., & Espinoza, G. (2012). Friending, IMing, and hanging out face-to-face: Overlap in adolescents’ online and offline social networks. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 356–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026980
Seo, M., Kim, J., & Yang, H. (2016). Frequent interaction and fast feedback predict perceived social support: Using crawled and self-reported data of Facebook users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(4), 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12160
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
Trepte, S., Dienlin, T., & Reinecke, L. (2015). Influence of social support received in online and offline contexts on satisfaction with social support and satisfaction with life: A longitudinal study. Media Psychology, 18(1), 74–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.838904
TÜİK (2018). Hanehalkı bilişim teknolojileri kullanım araştırması, sayı: 27819, 08 Ağustos 2018. Haber bülteni. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=27819 adresinden 17 Mart 2019 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
White, M., & Dorman, S. M. (2001). Receiving social support online : Implications for health education, Health Education Research, 16(6), 693–707.
Wong, E. T. K., & Ma, W. W.-K. (2016). Exploring relationship between online social support and individual online subjective well-being among young adults. 66th ICA Annual Conference, (June), 30.
Wright, K. B. (2016). Communication in health-related online social support groups/communities: A review of research on predictors of participation, applications of social support theory, and health outcomes. Review of Communication Research, 4, 65- 87. doi:10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.010
Wright, K. B., Rosenberg, J., Egbert, N., Ploeger, N. A., Bernard, D. R., & King, S. (2013). Communication competence, social support, and depression among college students: A model of Facebook and face-to-face support network influence. Journal of Health Communication, 18(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2012.688250
Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., Palmer, N. A., & Reisner, S. L. (2015). Online social support as a buffer against online and offline peer and sexual victimization among U.S. LGBT and non-LGBT youth. Child Abuse and Neglect, 39, 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.08.006
Zell, A. L., & Moeller, L. (2018). Are you happy for me … on Facebook? The potential importance of “likes” and comments. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.050