Heterodoks Bir Mikro İktisat Teorisine Doğru: Evrimci İktisadın Teknolojik Gelişme Yaklaşımı ve Firmanın Doğası
Bu çalışma evrimci iktisat teorileri ve firmanın evrimci doğası ile ilgilenmektedir. Denge merkezli Newtoncu mekanikten etkilenen ana akım iktisat, akademik dünyaya egemen olmakla birlikte, son yirmi yılda evrimci düşünceler heterodoks ekonomik yaklaşım içerisinde daha fazla ilgi çekmektedir. Çağdaş evrimci iktisat, neoklasik iktisadın statik kavramsal çerçevesini eleştiren, kapitalist ekonomideki girişimciliğe ve teknolojik değişime odaklanan Schumpeter’in çalışmalarından gelişmiştir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı; iktisattaki evrimci yaklaşımları özetlemek ve teknolojik değişmenin firma düzeyindeki kaynaklarını araştırmaktır. Evrimci iktisadın temel özellikleri, iktisadi dinamiği dikkate alması, iktisadi ajanları heterojen olarak kabul etmesi, ajanlar arasındaki etkileşimi bir seçilim mekanizması olarak ele alması ve sonuç olarak toplumdaki yeniliğin kaynaklarını araştırması olarak özetlenebilir. Bu çalışma öz-örgütlenme ve karmaşıklık teorisi gibi evrimci iktisatta yeni tartışılan konular üzerine de bir değerlendirme sunmaktadır.
Toward to a Heterodox Microeconomic Theory: Technological Development Approach of Evolutionary Economics and Nature of Firm
This paper deals with the theories of evolutionary economics and the evolutionary nature of the firm. Although mainstream economics, which is influenced by equilibrium-based Newtonian mechanics, dominates the academic-world we have seen a revival of interest in evolutionary ideas in heterodox economics more generally over the last two decades. Contemporary evolutionary economics, which mainly stems from works of Schumpeter, focuses on entrepreneurship and technological change in the capitalist economy and criticizes the static framework of neoclassic economics. The main aim of this paper is to summarize evolutionary approaches in economics and to investigate the source of technological change at the firm level. Main presumptions of evolutionary economics can be summarized as the consideration of dynamics, the acceptance of heterogeneity among agents and the view of interaction among agents as a selection mechanism and finally the recognition of source of continuous novelty in society. Moreover, this paper presents an assessment of emergent topics in the evolutionary literature, namely self-organization and complexity theory.
___
- Alada, Dinç (2000) İktisat Felsefesi ve Belirsizlik, Bağlam Yay. , İstanbul.
- Alchian, Armen (1950), “Uncertainty, Evolution And Economic Theory”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 58, : 211-22.
- Alchian, Armen, Demsetz,Harold (1972), “Production, İnformation Costs, And Economic Organization”, American Economic Review, Vol. 62 No. 4, : 777-95.
- Antonelli, Cristiano (1995) The Economics of Localized Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics, Kluwer Academıc Pub. ,Netherland.
- Buğra, Ayşe (2003) İktisatçılar ve İnsanlar 5.B, İletişim Yay. ,İstanbul.
- Bulutay, Tuncer (1980) “Neoklasik İktisat Modelinin Firma Kuramı Üzerine Değerlendirmeler ve Eleştirmeler” A Ü SBF Dergisi,No1–4: 87–106
- Cıpolla, Carlo (1999) Dünya Nüfusunun İktisat Tarihi, (2.B), Ötüken yay. İstanbul.
- Coase, Ronald (1937), “The Nature of The Firm”, Economica, . 4. 386-405.
- Demir, Ömer. (1996) Kurumcu İktisat, Vadi Yayınları, Ankara
- Dopfer, Kurt, Foster, John, Potts, Jason (2004) “. Micro–meso–macro.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14, 263–279
- Dosi, Giovanni (1990) “Economic Change and Its Interpretation or Is There a Schumpeterian Approach”İç Heertje –Perlman (ed) Evolving technology And Market Structure Unv. Of Michigan Prs. USA
- Eldredge, Niles , (2005) “The dynamics of evolutionary stasis” Paleobiology, 31(2), 133–145
- Eldredge, Niles, Gould, Stephen Jay (1997) "On punctuated equilibria [letter]." Science, 276
- Fagerberg, Jan (2003) “ Schumpeter and the Revival of Evolutionary Economics” Journal of Evolutionary Economics No:13.
- Foss, Nicolai (1993) “Theories of the Firm: Contractual and Competence Perspectives” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 3 (2): 127-144
- Foster, John (1997). “The Analytical Foundations Of Evolutionary Economics: From Biological Analogy To Economic Selforganization”. Structural Change Economic Dynamics. 8, 427–451.
- Foster, John (2000) “Competition Selection, Self-Organization And Joseph A Schumpeter”. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 10, 311–328.
- Foster, John (2005).”From Simplistic To Complex Systems İn Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics. 29, 873–892.
- Foster, John (2006) “Why İs Economics Not a Complex Science” Journal of Economic Issues, 4,Dec: 1069-1991
- Foster, John, Metcalfe, Stanley (2001) “ Modern evolutionary perspectives: an overview.” İç : Foster John, Metcalfe Stanley (eds.) Frontiers of Evolutionary Economics: Competition, Self-Organization and Innovation Policy. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham
- Freeman, Chris (1987) Technology Policy And Economic Performance : Lessons From Japan, Pinter London
- Freeman, Chris (1990) “Yeni Teknoloji ve Yetişme Sorunu” (cev: A Göker), Mühendis ve Makine 31,368
- Freeman, Chris, Soete Luc (2003) Yenilik İktisadı (çev:E . Türkcan) Tübitak Yay. ,Ankara
- Freeman, Chris, Perez, Carlota (1988) , 'Structural Crises Of Adjustment: Business Cycles And İnvestment Behaviour', İç: Dosi, Freeman, Nelson (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London 38-66
- Gould, Stephen Jay (1984) Darwin ve Sonrası, Tübitak Yay. ,Ankara.
- Gowdy, John (1997) “ Introduction-Biology and Economics” Structural Change Economic Dynamics. 8,:377-383
- Gürkan ,Ceyhun (2007) “Veblen, Schumpeter ve Teknoloji” İç E. Özveren(der.) Kurumsal İktisat, İmge Yay. Ankara
- Güvenç, Bozkurt (1991) İnsan ve Kültür 5: B, Remzi Kit. , Ankara
- Hanusch, Horst , Pyka, Andreas (2007) “Principles of Neo-Schumpeterian Economics “ Cambridge Journal of Economics 31, 275–289
- Hayek, Friedrich (1945) “Use of Knowledge in Society” American Economic Review, 4: 519-530
- Heilbroner, Robert (2003) İktisat Düşünürleri, (cev: A Tartanoğlu) ,Dost Yay. Ankara
- Hodgson, Geoffrey (1998) “Evolutionary And Competence-Based Theories Of The Firm” Journal of Economic Studies 25 No. 1 :25-56
- Hodgson, Geoffrey (2002) “Darwinism in Economics:From Analogy To Ontology” Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 12, 259-281.
- Kim, Linsu (1999), “Building, Technological Capability For İndustrialization : Analytical Frameworks And Korea's Experience'” Industrial And Corporate Change, vol. 8, no. 1, :111-36.
- Lall, Sanyana (1992) “Technological capabilities and industrialization”, World Development, vol. 20, no. 2, : 165-86.
- Lundvall, Bengt-Ake, (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter Publications,
- Magnusson, Lars(1993) “The Neo Schumpeterrian And Evolutionary Approach to Economics- An Introduction” İç: Magnusson Lars(Ed) “Evolutionary and Neo Schumpeterian Approaches to Economics , Kluver Ac Prs USA
- Malerba, Franco (1992) “The Organization of the Innovative Process” İç Rosenberg (eds) Technology and the Wellfare of Nations, Tandforth Unv Prs: USA
- Malerba, Franco (2004), “Sectoral system of Innovation Basic Concepts” in Malerba Franco (Ed) Sectoral system of Innovation :Concepts Issues and Analyses Six Major Sector in Europe , Cambridge Unv. Press ,UK
- Marshall, Ian , Zohar ,Danah (2006) Kim Korkar Schrödinger’in Kedisinden: A’dan Z’ye Yeni Bilim Kılavuzu, (4.B) ,Paradigma Yay. ;İstanbul.
- Matur, Eser (2007) “Kurumsal İktisat Açısında Firma Kuramı” İç E. Özveren(der.) Kurumsal İktisat, İmge Yay. Ankara
- Nelson, Richard, Winter Sidney (1982) An Evolutıonary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard Unv. Press, USA:
- Langlois, Richard, Everett, Micheal (1993) “What Is Evolutionary economics” İç: Magnusson Lars (Ed) “Evolutionary And Neo Schumpeterrian Approaches to Economics , Kluver Ac Prs USA
- Özveren, Eyüp (2007) “Kurumsal İktisat Aralanan Kara Kutu “İç E. Özveren(der.) Kurumsal İktisat, İmge Yay. Ankara
- Pelikan (1989) Market As a Instrument of Evolution of Structure ,Working Paper No: 237 IUI ,Stockholm
- Penrose, Edith (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Basil Blackwell, Oxford. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1995
- Prigogine Ilya, Stranger, Isabelle (1998) Kaostan Düzene (2.B) , İz Yay İstanbul
- Raine, Alan, Foster, John, Potts Jason (2006) “The New Entropy Law And The Economic Process” Ecological Complexity 3, 354-360
- Ruelle, David (1994) Raslantı ve Kaos ,(cev: D.Yurtören )TÜBİTAK Yay. ,Ankara
- Schumpeter, Joseph (1934) The Theory of Economic Development, Oxford Unv. Pres. New York, 1978
- Schumpeter, Joseph (1942) Kapitalizm Sosyalizm ve Demokrasi, 2.B (cev. T Akoğlu) ,Varlık Yay. İstanbul, 1968
- Skousen, Mark (2007) İktisadi Düşünce Tarihi, 3 B. Adres Yay. ,İstanbul
- Soyak, Alkan (1995) “Teknolojik Gelişme: Neoklasik Ve Evrimci Kuramlar Açısından Bir Değerlendirme” Ekonomik Yaklaşım, c:6,No:15
- Taymaz, Erol (1993) “Kriz ve Teknoloji” Toplum ve Bilim, Bahar, :61, 5–39
- Yılmaz, Feridun (2002) “Güç İlişkileri ve Firma Teorisi”, ” A Ü SBF Dergisi, 57: 1, 157-176
- Winter, Sidney G.(1968) "Toward a Neo-Schumpeterian Theory of the Firm" . Industrial and Corporate Change, ,2006, Vol. 15, No. 1: 125–141,(Tıpkı Basım)
- Witt, Ulrich (1997). “Self-Organization And Economics—What is New? “ Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 8, 489–507.
- Wood, Allen, Grant, Ted (2004) Aklın İsyanı: Marksist Felsefe ve Modern Bilim, (3.B) Tarih Bilinci Yay. , İstanbul
- ISSN: 1300-1868
- Yayın Aralığı: 3
- Yayıncı: Ekonomik Yaklaşım Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler
Türkiye'de Bireysel Emeklilik Sistemi'ndeki Cinsiyet Farklılıklarının Analizi
S. Cihan BOZKUŞ, Adem Y. ELVEREN
Turkish Women in Trade Union Leadership
Türkiye'de Faiz ve Kur Politikalarının İhracat Üzerindeki Etkisi
Süleyman DEĞİRMEN, Filiz ELMAS
Türkiye'de 1980 Sonrası Devlet Sermaye İlişkileri ve "Parçalı Burjuvazi" nin Oluşumu