Failure of communication between the Turkish state and civil society: The regulation process of media
Çelişkili bir kavram olan sivil toplum kavramı, yüz yıllardan beri siyaset bilimciler tarafından tartışılan bir konu olmuştur. Bu çalışmada Türkiye’deki sivil toplumun gelişemeyen bir konumda olması iddia edilmektedir. Çalışmanın temel sorunu, devlet gözetimi olmaksızın sivil toplumun aktiviteleri için izin verilen alanın son derece dar olması ve devlet ve dev uluslar arası ve ulusal tekeller tarafından sınırları çizilen bu alanın sınırları içindeki meydanın rolüdür. Sivil toplum ve sivil toplumun devlet müdahalesi tarafından düzenlenmesi ile ilgili olarak ciddî tartışmalar olmuştur. Bu nedenle bu gerçeğe karşı ağır eleştiri ve muhalefet yaşanmıştır. Türk devleti sivil toplumu kontrol altında tutmakta ısrarcı olmuştur ve bu yüzden de bu önemli ilişki bağlamında Batı ile benzer bir görüntü vardır: medyaya karşı devlet. Türkiye’deki sivil toplumun hükümet zinciri aracılığı ile boğulmaktadır ve sivil özgürlükler tehlike altına girmektedir. Özet olarak, sivil toplumun düzenlenmesi ve kontrolü demokrasiye zarar vermektedir ve ne yazık ki küresel tekeller tarafından ele geçirilmekle birlikte Türk medyası da bundan payını almaktadır.
Türkiye'de devlet ve sivil toplum arasındaki iletişimde yaşanan başarısızlık: Medyanın düzenlenmesi
Civil society, a paradoxical term, has always been an issue of debate for the political thinkers who have been discussing the term for centuries. In this study, it is claimed that civil society in Turkey has not been in a proliferating position. The primary concern of the study is the extremely narrow space allowed for the activities of civil society without the state's supervision and the role of the media within the frontiers of that space which are drawn by the state itself along with the gigantic international and national monopolies. There has been serious debate over the civil society and its regulation by the intervention of the state. Thus, this reality has experienced sharp criticism and opposition. The Turkish state has been insistent while controlling civil society and thus, there is a similar appearance with the West regarding the prominent relationship: the state versus media. Civil society in Turkey has been strapped by governmental chains and civil liberties have been jeopardized. In brief, the control and the regulation of civil society have been detrimental to democracy and unfortunately, the Turkish media has had its part while being conquered by the global monopolies
___
- Adaklı, Gülseren (2001), “ Yayıncılık Alanında Mülkiyet ve Kontrol”, in Medya Politikaları, (eds. Kejanlıoğlu, Beybin; Çelenk, Sevilay and Adaklı, Gülseren) İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
- Adaklı, Gülseren (2009), “2002-2008: Türk Medyasında AKP Etkisi”, in AKP Kitabı Bir Dönüşümün Bilançosu, (eds. Uzgel, İlhan and Duru, Bülent) PhoenixYayınevi, Ankara.
- Adler, Alfred (1924), Understanding Human Nature, (trans. Wolfe, W. B. Fawcett) Premier, New York.
- Anderson, Perry (1977), “The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci”, New Left Review. Vol. 100. pp. 10; 50-52.
- Bianchi, Robert (1984), Interest Groups and Political Development in Turkey, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
- Chomsky, Noam (1985), Turning the Tide – U.S. Intervention in Central America and the Struggle for Peace, South End Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Cohen, Jean L. and Arato, Andrew (1997), Civil Society and Political Theory,: The MIT Press, Massachusetts.
- Dahl, Robert A (1956), A Preface to Democratic Theory, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
- Dursun, Çiler (2001), TV Haberlerinde İdeoloji, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
- Everling, Clark. (1991), “On the Significance of Militant Materialism: Dialectical-Materialist Logic and Critical Thinking”, Nature, Society, and Thought. Vol. 4. No. 3. p. 333.
- Forment, Carlos A. (1996), “Peripheral Peoples and Narrative Identities: Arendtian Reflections on Late Modernity”, in Democracy and Difference, (ed. Benhabib, Seyla) Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
- Foucault, Michael (1982), “The Subject and Power”, in Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics H.L. (eds. Rabinow, Paul and Dreyfus, Hubert) Harvester, Brighton.
- Gellner, Ernest, (1994), Conditions of Liberty: Civil society and its Rivals, Hamish Hamilton, London.
- Gramsci, Antonio (1989). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. (ed. and translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith), International Publications, New York.
- Habermas, Jürgen (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: an Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
- Habermas, Jürgen (1999), “Three Models of Normative Democracy”, in Questioning Ethics: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy (ed.Kearney, Richard and Pooley, Mark) Routledge, London, New York.
- Habermas, Jürgen (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Rehg, W. (trans.) MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
- Heper, Metin (1985), The State Tradition in Turkey, Eothen, Northgate.
- Heper, Metin. (1991). “The State and Interest Groups with Special Reference to Turkey”, in Strong State and Economic Interest Groups: The Post 1980 Turkish Experience, (ed. Heper, M.) Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.
- Kaya, A. Raşit. (2009), İktidar Yumağı. Medya – Sermaye – Devlet, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
- Keane, John. (1988), Civil Society and the State, Verso, London.
- Kejanlıoğlu, Beybin (2004), Türkiye’de Medya’nın Dönüşümü, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
- Keyder, Çağlar (1987), State and Class in Turkey: a Study in Capitalist Development. Verso, London.
- Keyder, Çağlar and Öncü, Ayşe (1993), Istanbul and the Concept of World Cities, Friedrich Ebert Foundation, Istanbul.
- Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal (1985), Hegemony and the Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, Verso, London.
- Louw, Eric (2005), The Media and Political Process, Sage Publications, London.
- Macridis, Roy C. (1986), Contemporary Political Ideologies – Movements and Regimes Little, Brown and Company, Boston.
- Mann, Michael (1986), The Sources of Social Power, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- McChesney, Robert, W. (2004), The Problem of the Media. U.S. Communication Politics in the 21st Century, Monthly Review Press, New York.
- Özsever, Atilla (2004), Tekelci Medyada Örgütsüz Gazeteci, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
- Self, Peter (1985), Political Theories of Modern Government: Its Role and Reform, Allen and Unwin, London.
- Topçuoğlu, Nur N. (1995), Basında Reklam ve Tüketim Olgusu. Türkiye’de Yeni Gazetecilik Yönelimleri ve Basının Sosyo-Kültürel Değişimdeki Rolü, Vadi Yayınları, Ankara.
- Tortop, Nuri (1982), “The Rights of Civil Servants to Establish Associations and Professional Organizations Bearing the Character of Public Institutions”, Turkish Public Administration Annual. Vol. 9. No.10. pp.3-21.
- Trentmann, Frank (1999), Paradoxes of Civil Society: New perspectives on Modern German and British History, Berghahn Books, New York.
- Tünay, Muharrem (1993), “The Turkish New Right’s Attempt at Hegemony”, in The Political and Socioeconomic Transformation of Turkey, (eds. Eralp, A., Tünay, M. and Yeşilada, B), Praeger, Westport, Conn.
- Weber, Max (1930), The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Allen & Unwin Publishers Ltd., Sydney.
- Yesilada, Birol (1988), “Problems of Political Development in the Third Turkish Republic”, Polity. Vol. 21. pp. 345-372.
- ISSN: 1300-1868
- Yayın Aralığı: 3
- Yayıncı: Ekonomik Yaklaşım Derneği