Ekonomi Biliminde Dönüşümün Nobel Ekonomi Ödüllerine Yansıması

Ekonomi, doğal bilimler kadar kesin neden - sonuç ilişkilerine dayanmamaktadır. Ayrıca birbirinden çok farklı yöntemlerin tartışılmasına da açıktır. Araştırılan dünyanın ve insan ilişkilerinin de sürekli bir değişim içinde bulunması, birliğinde tartışılan yöntemlerin de sürekli farklılık göstermesi sonucunu getirmiştir. Nobel Ekonomi Ödüllerinin 39 yıllık tarihi incelendiğinde, matematiksel yöntemlerin ağırlıklı kullanıldığı çalışmaların daha fazla ödül aldığı görülmektedir. Bu durum, “bilimsel çalışmaların yörüngesini etkilemekte midir?”,“Egemen görüş olan Neoklasik Ekonomiyi daha da güçlendirmekte midir?” Ayrıca, “bu iki gelişme birbirini besleyen ve karşılıklı işleyen bir süreç oluşturmakta mıdır?” sorularını, yöntemsel tartışmalar eşliğinde akla getirmektedir.Bu çalışmamızda, ekonomi biliminin tanımlamak ve çözümlemek zorunda olduğu ekonomik konu ve sorunlara bağlı olarak çeşitlenen görüşleri, Nobel Ekonomi Ödülü çerçevesinde incelemek istedik. 2000’li yıllarda bu alanda verilen ödüllere konu olan ekonomistler ile bunların ödüle konu kılınan çalışmalarını irdeleyerek, ekonomi biliminin hangi yöne yöneldiği üzerine projektör tutmak istiyoruz.

Affect of Economic Science Conversion on Nobel Economic Prize

There is not a certain casual relations in eceonomics as it is in natural sciences. Furthermore, it is open to discuss quite different methods. Since the world and human relations are in a continuous change, the discussing methods also vary continuously. As the 39–year–period of Nobel Economy Prize is viewed, the studies which mathematical methods are heavily used seemed to be more appropriate fort The Nobel Prize. “Does it affect the guiding line of scientific studies?”, “Does it strengthen The Neo - classical Economics which is already dominant conception?”. Furthermore, “Do both situations compose a mutual process?” These are the questions that come to mind along with methodical discussions.. In this study, we wanted to examine the opinions within the term of Nobel Prize, which vary according to the subjects and problems that economics has to determine and resolve. We want to throw a light on which way the economics tend to go as we consider the economists and their studies who won The Nobel Prize in

___

  • Aumann, Robert J., “Existence Of Competitive Equilibria In Markets With A Contınuum Of Traders” Econometrica (pre-1986); 34 , 1; pg. 1,1966.
  • Aumann, Robert J., “An Axıomatızatıon Of The Non-Transferable Utility Value”, Econometrica (pre-1986); 53, 3; pg. 599, May 1985.
  • Aumann, Robert J., “Correlated equilibrium As An Expression Of Bayesian Ration ali ty”, Econometrica (1986-1998); 55, 1; pg. 1, Jan 1987.
  • Aumann, Robert J., “Markets With A Contınuum Of Traders”, Econometrica (pre-1986); 32, 1,2; pg. 39, Jan-Apr 1964.
  • Aumann, Robert J., “Notes And Comments On The Non-Transferable Utility Value: A Comment On The Roth-Shafer Examples” Econometrica (pre-1986); 53, 3; pg. 667 May 1985.
  • Aumann, Robert J., “Rejoinder”, Econometrica (1986-1998); 54, 4; pg. 985, Jul 1986.
  • Aumann, Robert J., “Utility Theory Without The Completeness Axiom”, Econometrica (pre-1986); 30, 3; pg. 445, Jul 1962.
  • Aumann, Robert J., “Value, Symmetry And Equal Treatment: A Comment On Scafuri And Yannelis”, Econometrica (1986-1998); 55, 6; pg. 1461, Nov 1987.
  • Aumann, Robert J., “Values Of Markets Wıth A Continuum Of Traders”, Econometrica (pre-1986); 43, 4; pg. 611, Jul 1975.
  • Aumann, Robert J., Brandenburger, Adam, “Epistemic Conditions For Nash Equilibrium”, Econometrica (1986-1998); 63, 5; pg. 1161, Sep 1995.
  • Aumann, Robert J., Dreze, Jacques H., “Values Of Markets With Satiation Or Fixed Prices” Econometrica (1986-1998); 54, 6; pg. 1271, Nov 1986.
  • Aumann, Robert J., Kurz, Mordecai, “Power And Taxes”, Econometrica (pre-1986); 45, 5; pg. 1137, Jul 1977.
  • Ayson, Robert, “Bargaining With Nuclear Weapons: Thomas Schelling’s ‘General’ Concept of Stability”, The Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol.23, No.2, pp.48-71, June 2000.
  • Blanchard Oliver, “ What Do We Know About Macroeconomics That Fisher and Wicksell, Did Not”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1375-1405, November, 2000.
  • Bollerslev, Tim (1986), “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity”, Journal of Econometrics, 31, pp: 307–327.
  • Bollerslev Tim, Engle, R., and Wooldridge, J., M. (1986), “A Capital Asset Pricing Model with Time Varying Covariances”, Journal of Political Economy, 96, pp: 116-131.
  • Boulding, E., “Samuelson’s Foundations: The Role of Mathematics İn Economics”, The Journal of Political Economy, 56, 187-199, 1948.
  • Buğra, Ayşe, İktisatçılar ve İnsanlar, İletişim Yay. İstanbul, 2005
  • Byde, Andrew, “Applying Evolutionary Game Theory to Auction Mechanism Design”, Hawlett-Packard Company, 2002.
  • Colman, Andrew M., “Thomas C. Schelling’s Psychological Decision Theory: Introduction To A Special Issue”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 603–608, 2006.
  • Çüçen, A. Kadir, Bilgi Felsefesi, Asa Kitabevi, 2001.
  • Davidson R., MC Kinnon G., Estimation and Inference in Econometrics, Oxford University Press, New York , 1993.
  • Enders, Walter, Applied Econometric Time Series, John Wiley & Sons, INC., New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore, 1995.
  • Engle Robert, and C. W. J. Granger, “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing.”, Econometrica, 55, pp: 251–277, 1987.
  • Engle Robert, “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of U.K. Inflation “, Econometrica, 50, pp: 987–1008, 1982.
  • Engle, Robert, “Risk and Volatility: Econometric Models and Financial Practice”, The Nobel Lecture, www.nobelprize.org, 2003.
  • Ekelund, R.B. ve Hebert, R.F., A History of Economic Theory and Method, MacGraw-Hill, 1990.
  • Eren, Ercan, Melike Bildirici, “İktisat Teorilerinde Son Gelişmeler”, İktisat Dergisi, 65–78, Mart, 1997.
  • Fınon, Dominique, “Discussion of Thomas Schelling's paper :The Environmental Challenges of Power”, The Energy Journal; 19, 2; pg. 125, 1998.
  • Finn E. Kydland; Edward C. Prescott “ Rules Rather Than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans” The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 85, No. 3 (Jun., 1977)
  • Finn E. Kydland; Edward C. Prescott “Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations” Econometrica, Vol. 50, No. 6 (Nov., 1982)
  • Finn E. Kydland; Edward C. Prescott “The Computational Experiment: An Econometric Tool” The J ournal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 10, No. 1. (Winter, 1996)
  • Finn E. Kydland; Edward C. Prescott “The Econometrics of the General Equilibrium Approach to Business Cycles” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 93, No. 2, Proceedings of a Conference on New Approaches to Empirical Macroeconomics, Jun, 1991.
  • Granger, C. W. J., “Testing for Causality and Feedback," Econometrica, 37, pp: 424–438., 1969.
  • Granger C. W. J., Newbold P., "Spurious Regressions in Econometrics," Journal of Econometrics, 2, pp: 111–120, 1974.
  • Granger, C. W. J., “Some Properties of Time Series Data and their Use in Econometric Model Specification,”, Journal of Econometrics, 16: pp: 121–30, 1981.
  • Granger, C. W. J., "Some Recent Developments in a Concept of Causality." Journal of Econometrics, 39, pp: 199–212, 1988. Essays in Econometrics: Collected Papers of Clive W. J. Granger, Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp: 71–84 içinde.
  • Granger, C. W. J., “Time Series Analysis, Cointegration, and Applications”, The Nobel Lecture, www.nobelprize.org, 2003.
  • Granger, C. W. J., “Modeling, Evaluation, and Methodology in The New Century”, Economic Inquiry, 43, pp: 1–12, 2005.
  • Gökçe, Atilla, “İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsası Gelirlerindeki Volatilitenin ARCH Teknikleri ile Ölçümü”, G.Ü. İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 1, ss: 35–58, 2001.
  • Harris R., Sollis R., Applied Time Series Modelling and Forecasting , John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, 2003
  • Hendry, David F., “Econometric Modelling with Cointegrated Variables: an Overview”, Oxfort Bulletin of Economics and Statics, 48, pp: 50–61, 1986.
  • Nelson, D. B., “Conditional Heteroscedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach”, Econometrica, 59, pp: 347–390, 1991.
  • Mirowski, P., “The When, the How and the Why of Mathematical Expression in the History of Economic Anlysis”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 145–157. 1991.
  • O’Neıll Barry, Book Review, “Handbook of Game Theory, Vol. 3 Edited by Robert Aumann and Sergiu Hart, Elsevier, New York, 2002” , Games and Economic Behavior 46 215–218, 2004.
  • Phelps, Edmund S., “The Golden Rule of Capital Accumulation” American Economic Review, 51, s.638 – 643, 1961.
  • Phelps, Edmund S., “Phillips Curves, Expectations of Inflation and Optimal Unemployment Over Time”, Economica, 34(3), August, s.254 – 281, 1967
  • Phelps, Edmund S., “The Emerging Microeconomics in Employment and Inflation Theory”, American Economic Review, Vol.59(2), 1969.
  • Phelps, Edmund S., “The Natural Rate Controversy and Economic Theory”, Inflation and Canadian Experience, Industrial Relations Center , Queen’s University, Ontario , 1971.
  • Phelps, Edmund S., Recent Developments in Macroeconomics. The International Library of Critical Writings in Economics 13, Vol.1, Edgard Elvar Publishing Company, 1991.
  • Reny Philip J., Book Review, “The Collected Papers of Robert J. Aumann. Robert J. Aumann, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000. Vol. 1, 720 pp; Vol. 2, 672 pp.”, Games and Economic Behavior 42 327–332, 2003
  • Roux, Dominique, İktisadın Nobeli. Çev. Mehmet Ali Kılıçbay. Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Yayınları, Yayın No:21, İstanbul, 2004.
  • Smith, Stephen, Labour Economics. Routledge Press, second edition, London,s.337 – 351, 2003.
  • Stiglitz, J., Philippe Aghion, Roman Frydman ve Michael Woodford., “Edmund Phelps and Modern Macroeconomics”, 2001.
  • Schellıng, Thomas C., “Bargaining, Communication, And Limited War”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution (pre-1986); 1, 1; pg. 19, Mar 1957.
  • Schellıng, Thomas C., “Game Theory And The Study Of Ethical Systems”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution (pre-1986); 12, 1; pg. 34 , Mar 1968.
  • Schellıng, Thomas C., “The Cost Of Combating Global Warming: Facing The Tradeoffs”, Foreign Affairs; 76, 6; pg. 8, Nov/Dec 1997.
  • Schellıng, Thomas C., “The Role Of Deterrence In Total Disarmament”, Foreign Affairs (pre-1986); 40, 000003; pg. 392, Apr 1962.
  • Schellıng, Thomas C., “What Went Wrong With Arms Control?”, Foreign Affairs (pre-1986); 64, 002; pg. 219, Winter 1985/1986.
  • Schellıng, Thomas C.,, “The Environmental Challenges Of Power Generation”, The Energy Journal; 19, 2; pg. 115, 1998.
  • Schellıng, Thomas, C., Halperın, Morton, H., Strategy and Arms Control, Pergoman Press, 1985.
  • Schellıng, Thomas, C., The Strategy of Conflict, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England, 1995.
  • Shiller, R. J. (2003), “From Efficient Markets Theory to Behavioral Finance”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, pp: 83–104.
  • The Royal Swedish Ac adem y of Sciences (RSAS), “Robert Aumann’s and Thomas Schelling’s Contributions to Game Theory:Analyses of Conflict and Cooperation”, The Royal Swedish Ac adem y of Sciences Information Department, Stockholm, Sweden, 2005 (www.kwa.sew, Erişim Tarihi: 25.2.2007).
  • The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, “Edmund Phelps’s Contributions to Macroeconomics”, October, 2006. www.kva.se
  • The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, “The Prize İn Economics Sciences 2007”, www.kva.se