Varietal Screening in Chickpea Against Gram Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) in Field Conditions Using Biochemical Parameters
Varietal Screening in Chickpea Against Gram Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) in Field Conditions Using Biochemical Parameters
A field experiment was conducted to screen the 15 chickpea genotypes against gram pod borer by using biochemical
parameters at Research Farm of Pulses Section, Deptt. of G&PB, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana
(India). The pooled analysis of two winter season 2013-14 & 2014-15 revealed thatthe maximum and minimum mean
larval population of Helicoverpa armigera was 17.99 and 28.50 l/mrlon GNG 1581 and HK-2 genotype, respectively.
The yield, per cent pod damageand pest susceptibility rating (PSR) ranged from 136.94 to 326.94 kg/ha, 33.26 to
83.30% and 3 to 7, respectively. Among the 15 chickpea genotypes maximum yield (326.94 kg/ha) minimum pod
damage (33.26%) and PSR (3) was recorded on GNG 1581 while, in HK-2 minimum yield (136.94 kg/ha),maximum
pod damage (83.30%) and PSR (7) was observed. The content of different biochemical in chickpea plantsviz., Malic
acid, Total phenol, Total soluble sugars, Cellulose, Hemicellulose and Lignin were evaluated for screening and these
listed biochemicalranged from 137.51 to 265.65 mg/g, 35.62 to 60.06 mg/g, 2.28 to 4.12 mg/g, 16.05 to 27.15 mg/g,
16.30 to 22.65 mg/g and 6.80 to 12.10 mg/g, respectively. The significant and negative correlation coefficient was
recorded between malic acid and mean larval population of H. armigera (r= -0.69**) while, all other parameters were
correlated non-significantly. Thus malic can be used as selection criteria for identifying H. armigera tolerant genotypes
in chickpea.
___
- Bhatt NJ and Patel RK, (2001) Screening of chickpea
cultivars for their resistance to gram pod borer,
Helicoverpa armigera. lndian Journal of Entomology,
63(3), 277-280.
- Bhagwat VR, Aherker SK, Satpute VS and
Thakre HS, (1995) Screening of chieckpea
(Cicer arientinum L.) genotypes for resistance
to Helicoverpa armigera (Hb.) and its relationship
with malic acid in leaf exudates. Journal of
Entomological Research, 19, 249-253.
- Chhabra KS, Sharma AK, Saxena AK and Kooner BS,
(1990) Sources of resistance in chickpea; role
of biochemical components of the incidence of
gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner).
Indian Journal of Entomology, 52, 423-430.
- Girija Salimath, PM, Patil SA, Gowda CLL and
Sharma HC, (2008) Biophysical and biochemical
basis of plant resistance to pod borer
[Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] in chickpea
(Cicer arietinum L.). Indian Journal of Genetics,
68(3), 320-323.
- Hossain MA, (2009) Field screening of chickpea genotypes
against pod borer. Bangladesh Journal of
Agricultural Research, 34(3), 517-521.
- Jukanti AK, Gaur PM, Gowdal CLL and Chibbar RN,
(2012) Nutritional quality and health benefits of
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): A review. British
Journal of Nutrient, 108(1), 11-26.
- Lateef SS, (1985) Gram pod borer [Heliothis armigera
(Hub.)] resistance to chickpea. Agriculture, Ecosystem
& Environment, 14, 95-102.
- Lateef SS and Reed W, (1995) A suggested system of
rating pigeonpea and chickpea entries for field
resistant to Heliothis armigera. In: Proceedings
of the National seminar on breeding crop plants
for resistance to pests and diseases, pp. 25-27.
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore,
Tamil Nadu, India.
- Nadeem S, Hamed M, Shafique M, Atta BM and Shah
TM, (2011) Evaluation for resistance in kabuli
chickpea genotypes against chickpea pod borer,
Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera:
Noctuidae) under field conditions. Songklanakarin
Journal of Science and Technology, 33(3),
291-294.
- Patnaik HP and Senapati B, (1995) Influence of acidity
of chickpea leaves on the incidence of Heliothis
armigera (Hubner) in resistance/susceptibility
cultivar. Journal of Entomological Research, 31,
105-108.
- Pawar VM, (1998) Microbial control of Helicoverpa
sp. on pulse crops. IPM systems in Agriculture,
pp:55-78. Aditya books private limtited, New
Delhi, India.
- Rembold H, (1981). Malic acid in chickpea exudates
a marker for Heliothis resistance. International
Chickpea Newsletter, 4, 18-19.
- Rembold H, Wallner P, Kohne A, Lateef SS, Grune M
and Weigner CH, (1990) Mechanisms of host
plant resistance with special emphasis on biochemical
factors. Proceedings of the Second International
Workshop on Chickpea Improvement,
p.191. ICRISAT/ICARDA, Patancheru, Andhra
Pradesh, India.
- Sharma HC, Gowda CLL, Sharma KK, Gaur
PM, Mallikkarjuna N, Buhariwalla HK and
Crouch JH, (2003) Host plant resistance to pod
borer. Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea. Chickpea
Research for the Millenium; Proceedings,
International Chikpea Conference, pp. 118-137.
- Shankar M, Munghate RS, Babu TR, Sridevi D and
Sharma HC (2014) Population density and damage
by pod borers, Helicoverpa armigera and
Spodoptera exigua in a diverse array of chickpea
genotypes under natural infestation in the field.
Indian Journal of Entomology, 76(2), 117-127.
- Singh B and Yadav RP (1999) Field screening of chickpea
(Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes against gram
pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hub.) under
late sown conditions. Journal of Entomological
Research, 23(2), 133-140.
- Sithanantham S, (1987). lnsect pests of pigeonpea and
chickpea and their management. Plant protection
in field crops, p. 159. Plant Protection Association
of India. Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
- Vaishampayam SM and Veda OP, (1980) Population dynamics
of gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera
(Hubner) and its outbreak situation on gram,
Cicer arietinum L. at Jabalpur. Indian Journal
of Entomology, 42, 453-459.
- Yoshida M, Cowgill SE and Wightman JA, (1995)
Mechanism of resistance to Helicoverpa
armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in chickpea:
Role of oxalic acid in leaf exudates as antibiotic
factor. Journal of Economic Entomology,
88, 1783-1786.