Variability for Agro-Morphological Traits of Maize (Zea mays L.) Inbred Lines Differing in Drought Tolerance
Variability for Agro-Morphological Traits of Maize (Zea mays L.) Inbred Lines Differing in Drought Tolerance
Drought tolerant genotypes have high yield in optimal conditions and lower, but stable yield in dry environments. Gene
bank collection (6,000 accessions) of Maize Research Institute was tested under controlled drought in Egypt, and in
temperate climate. The mini-core collection of 15 inbreds and 26 populations was created. Inbreds together with lines
B73, A632, Mo17 and few commercial inbreds with different tolerance to drought, were evaluated for agro-morphological
traits (plant and ear height, total number of leaves, number of leaves above ear, ear leaf length and width), grain yield,
number of rows per ear and number of kernels per row, under optimal and increased density in the field in 2014. Since
optimal precipitation for maize growing in Serbia is 425 mm, total precipitations of 873.2 mm along with the average
temperature of 18.8˚C were exceptionally good for maize production. According to Principal Component Analysis, traits
that contributed to the differentiation and were in common for both densities were: number of kernels per row, grain yield
and leaf width. Obtained results indicated that inbreds T4 and T8 performed the highest stability, together with commercial
T1 and T2 lines, in both experimental conditions. Cluster analysis based on grain yield and morphological traits, grouped
them together with the other drought tolerant lines, apart of B73 and lines that showed sensitivity to drought in previous
studies. Higher density conditions, simulating mild stress, contributed to more accurate separation of lines from mini-core
collection, which could be used as a source for drought tolerance in breeding programs.
___
- Andjelkovic V, Kravic N, Babic V, Ignjatovic Micic D,
Dumanovic Z, Vancetovic J (2014). Estimation of
drought tolerance among maize landraces from
mini-core collection. Genetika-Belgrade 46(3):
775-788.
Annicchiarico P (2002). Genotype × environment interaction:
Challenges and opportunities for plant
breeding and cultivar recommendations. FAO
Plant Prod. and Prot. Paper 174. FAO United
Nations, Rome.
Babic M, Andjelkovic V, Mladenovic Drinic S and
Konstantinov K (2011). The conventional and
contemporary technologies in maize (Zea mays
L.) breeding at Maize Research Institute Zemun
Polje. Maydica 56: 155-164.
Boyer JS, Byrne P, Cassman KG et al., (2013). The US
drought of 2012 in perspective: a call to action.
Global Food Security 2: 139-143.
Campos H, Cooper M, Edmeades GO, Löffler C, Schussler
JR and Ibañez M (2006). Changes in drought
tolerance in maize associated with fifty years of
breeding for yield in the U.S. corn belt. Maydica
51: 369-381.
Edmeades GO (2013). Progress in Achieving and Delivering
Drought Tolerance in Maize - An Update,
ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.
Epinat Le Signor C, Dousse S, Lorgeou J, Denis JB,
Bonhomme R, Carolo P and Charcosset A,
(2001). Interpretation of genotype x environment
interactions for early maize hybrids over
12 years. Crop Sci. 41: 663-669.
FAOSTAT (2010). Statistical databases and data-sets
of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx
Fasoula VA and Fasoula DA (2002). Principles underlying
genetic improvement for high and stable crop
yield potential. Field Crops Res. 75: 191-209.
Golbashy M, Ebrahimi M, Khavari Khorasani S and
Choucan R (2010). Evaluation of drought tolerance
of some corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Iran.
Afr. J. Agric. Res. 5 (19): 2714-2719.
Grassini P, Thorburn J, Burr C and Cassman KG (2011).
Highyield irrigated maize in the western U.S.
Corn Belt: I. On-farm yield, yield potential, and
impact of agronomic practices. Field Crops Res.
120: 142-150.
Grzesiak S (2001). Genotypic variation between maize
(Zea mays L.) single-cross hybrids in response
to drought stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 23(4):
443-456.
Hashemi AM, Herbert SJ and Putnam DH (2005).
Yield response of corn to crowding stress. Agron
J. 97: 839-846.
Ipsilandis CG and Vafias BN (2005). Plant density
effects on grain yield per plant in maize: Breeding
implications. Asian J. Plant Sci. 4: 31-39.
Löffler CM, Wei J, Fast T, Gogerty J, Langton S, Bergman
M, Merril B and Cooper M (2005). Classification
of maize environments using crop simulation
and geographic information systems. Crop
Sci. 45: 1708-1716.
MARS (2012). Crop monitoring in Europe. MARS
Bulletin 20(1): 1-26. (http://www.mars.jrc.ec.europa.eu/mars/bulletins-publications)
MARS (2014). Crop monitoring in Europe. MARS Bulletin
22(13): 1-23. (http://www.mars.jrc.ec.europa.eu/mars/bulletins-publications)
Menkir A, Badu Apraku B, Ajala S, Kamara A and
Ndiaye A (2009). Response of early maturing
maize landraces and improved varieties to moisture
deficit and sufficient water supply. Plant Gen.
Res. 7(3): 205-221.
Mohammadai H, Soleymani A and Shams M (2012).
Evaluation of Drought Stress Effects on Yield
Components and Seed Yield of Three Maize Cultivars
(Zea mays L.) in Isfahan region. Intl. J.
Agri. Crop Sci. 4(19):1436-1439.
Moose SP and Mumm RH (2008). Molecular plant
breeding as the foundation for the 21st century
crop improvement. Plant Physiol. 147:
969-977.
Rahman S, Mukul Md.M, Quddus T, Hassan L and
Haque Md.A (2015). Assessing genetic diversity
of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes for agronimic
traits. Res. Agric. Livest. Fish. 2(1): 53-61.
Sarlangue T, Andrade FH, Calvino PA and Purcell
LC (2007). Why do maize hybrids respond differently
to variations in plant density? Agron J.
99: 984-991.
Tollenaar M and Lee EA (2002). Yield potential, yield
stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field
Crops Res. 75: 161-169.
Vancetovic J, Mladenovic Drinic S, Babic M, Ignjatovic
Micic D and Andjelkovic V (2010). Maize genebank
collections as potentially valuable breeding
material. Genetika-Belgrade 42 (1): 9-21.
Vasic G and Kerecki B (1988). Suša i efekat navodnjavanja
na proizvodnju kukuruza. Zbornik radova
sa savetovanja o unapređenju proizvodnje i korišćenja
kukuruza. Kukuruz 88: 103-116.
Videnovic Ž, Dumanovic Z, Simic M, Srdic J, Babic M
and Dragicevic V (2013). Genetic potential and
maize production in Serbia. Genetika-Belgrade
45(3): 667-677.