Performance of Feed Barley Genotypes Assessed by AMMI Mixed with BLUP for North Western Plains Zone of the India
Performance of Feed Barley Genotypes Assessed by AMMI Mixed with BLUP for North Western Plains Zone of the India
AMMI analysis for feed barley genotypes evaluated North Wes tern Plains Zone of India had expressed highly significant
effects of environments (E), GxE interaction and genotypes (G). Interaction effects GxE accounted for 23.4 and 26.9%,
while environment explained up to tune of 63.4 and 61.4%; during cropping seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20, respectively.
ASTAB measure achieved the desirable lower values for PL906, DWRB137, UPB1080. Composite measure MASV1
found PL906, DWRB137, RD2552, and as per MASV ranks desired PL906, DWRB137, and UPB1080 genotypes
would be of choice for these locations of the zone. Superiority index while weighting 0.65 and 0.35 for average yield
& s tability found KB1707, PL906, RD2994 as of s table performance with high yield. Biplot graphical analysis as per
73.7% of variation of the measures exhibited MASV1 clubbed with ASTAB, EV, SIPC, Za, W3, WAASB and MASV
measures. For the second-year lower value of WAASB measure had observed for KB1707, RD2994. Barley genotypes
DWRB137, PL906 were selected as per values of ASTAB measure. MASV1 selected PL906, DWRB137 while PL906,
DWRB137 identified by MASV as genotypes of choice. Superiority index pointed towards PL906, DWRB137 feed barley
genotypes. About 64.3% of variation among the measures under biplot analysis seen AMMI based IPCA1, Za, W1, W2,
W3, ASTAB, WAASB measures grouped in quadrant. Simultaneous utilization of AMMI and BLUP of genotypes would
be more appropriate to recommend high-yielding s table genotypes.
___
- Agahi K, Ahmadi J, Oghan HA, Fotokian MH, Orang
SF, (2020). Analysis of genotype × environment
interaction for seed yield in spring oilseed rape
using the AMMI model. Crop Breeding and
Applied Biotechnology 20(1):e26502012
- Ajay BC, Bera SK, Singh AL, Kumar N,
Gangadhar K, Kona P, (2020). Evaluation of
Genotype × Environment Interaction and Yield
Stability Analysis in Peanut Under Phosphorus
Stress Condition Using Stability Parameters of
AMMI Model. Agriculture Research 9:477-486.
- Ajay BC, Aravind J, Fiyaz RA, Kumar N, Lal C, Kona
P, Dagla MC, Bera SK, (2019). Rectification of
modified AMMI stability value (MASV). Indian
J Genet 79(4):726-731.
- Badr A, Sch KMR, El Rabey H, Effgen S, Ibrahim
HH, Pozzi C, Rohde W, Salamini F, (2000). On
the origin and domestication history of barley
(Hordeum vulgare). Molecular Biology and
Evolution.17:499-510.
- Bocianowski J, Niemann J, Nowosad K, (2019).
Genotype-by environment interaction for seed
quality traits in interspecific cross-derived
Brassica lines using additive main effects and
multiplicative interaction model. Euphytica
215(7):1-13.
- Farshadfar E, (2008). Incorporation of AMMI stability
value and grain yield in a single non-parametric
index (GSI) in bread wheat. Pak J Biol Sci
11:1791-1796.
- Farshadfar E, Mahmodi N and Yaghotipoor A,
(2011). AMMI stability value and simultaneous
estimation of yield and yield stability in bread
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Australian Journal
of Crop Science 5:1837-1844.
- Gauch HG, (2013). A simple protocol for AMMI
analysis of yield trials. Crop Science 53:1860-
1869.
Kang MS, (1993). Simultaneous selection for yield and
stability in crop performance trials: Consequences
for growers. Agronomy Journal 85:754-757.
- Karkee A, Ghimire KH and Joshi BK, (2020).
Evaluation on naked barley landraces foragromorphological
traits. Journal of Nepal
Agricultural Research Council. 6:34-43.
- Kendel M, Dhami NB and Shrestha J, (2019).
Performance evaluation of barley (Hordeum
vulgare L.) genotypes in Dolakha, Nepal: from
yielding perspective. Journal of Agriculture and
Natural Resources 2(1):322-337.
- Newton AC, Flavell AJ, George TS, Leat P,
Mullholland B, Ramsay L, Revoredo-Giha C,
Russell J, Steffenson BJ, Swanston JS, Thomas
WTB, Waugh R, White PJ, Bingham IJ, (2011).
- Crops that feed the world 4. Barley: A resilient
crop? Strengths and weaknesses in the context
of food security. Food Security. 3:141-178.
- Olivoto T, Lucio A Dal’Col, Gonzalez, Silva JA da,
Marchioro VS, (2019). Mean performance and
stability in multi-environment trials I: Combining
features of AMMI and BLUP techniques.
Agronomy Journal. 111:1-12.
- Oyekunle M, Menkir A, Mani H, Olaoye G, Usman
IS, Ado S, (2017). Stability analysis of maize
cultivars adapted to tropical environments using
AMMI analysis. Cereal Research Communication
45:336-345.
- Piepho HP, Mo¨hring J, Melchinger AE, Bu¨chse
A, (2008). BLUP for phenotypic selection in
plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica
161(1):209-228.
- Rao AR and Prabhakaran VT, (2005). Use of AMMI
in simultaneous selection of genotypes for yield
and stability. Journal of the Indian Society of
Agricultural Statistics 59:76-82.
- Sneller CH, Norquest L Kilgore, Dombek D, (1997).
Repeatability of yield stability statistics in
soybean. Crop Sci. 37:383-390.
- Zali H, Farshadfar E, Sabaghpour SH, Karimizadeh R,
(2012). Evaluation of genotype × environment
interaction in chickpea using measures of stability
from AMMI model. Annuals of Biological
Research. 3:3126-3136.
- Zobel RW, Wright M J, Gauch HG Jr, (1988). Statistical
analysis of yield trial. Agronomy Journal 80:388-
393.