Effect of Temperature on Yield and Quality Parameters of Bread Wheat Cultivars at Different Growth Stages under Rainfed Conditions
Effect of Temperature on Yield and Quality Parameters of Bread Wheat Cultivars at Different Growth Stages under Rainfed Conditions
High temperature and its fluctuation influence bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield and quality before and after the grain filling stage in the Trakya region of Türkiye. Effect of the temperature between the Z24 and Z89 growth stages on yield, quality and some agronomic characters in bread wheat cultivars were investigated. This research was established with 25 genotypes in a randomised complete block design (RCBD) with 4 replications in Edirne and Tekirdağ locations, from 2010-2011 (E1) to 2015-2016 (E6) growing seasons. 5 common checks varieties were examined for their grain yield (GY), 1000-kernel weight (TKW), test weight (TW), protein ratio (PRT), wet gluten content (GLT), gluten index (IND), grain hardness (HARD), sedimentation value (SED), plant height (PH) and days of heading (DH). There were various relationships among environment, cultivar and temperature. The mean grain yield was in the range of 4454-8158 kg/ha-1 across six environments, in the Edirne location and E4 was the highest yielding environment while E6 was the lowest. As a result of the environmental effect, there was a 83.2% difference between the highest and lowest yield. The highest TKW (47.2 g) was in E4 and the lowest (34.3 g) was in E1. Test weight varied across six environments the lowest was in E3 and the highest in E2. Environment E1 had a higher protein ratio and wet gluten content, and E4 had the lowest protein ratio and wet gluten content. The gluten index varied from the lowest in E6 (71.3%), and the highest was 93.3 in E4. There was high variation in sedimentation value across six environments. The lowest value was in E4 (40.0 ml) and the highest was in 64.8 ml in E1. In the Tekirdağ location, the mean grain yield was in the range of 5485-8283 kg/ha-1, so there was a 51.0% difference between the highest and lowest yield. The highest (46.6 g) and lowest (39.5 g) TKW were in environments E2 and E1. Test weight varied across six environments the lowest was 81.1 kg in E4 and the highest was 85.2 kg in E2. Environment E3 had the lowest protein ratio, E1 had the lowest wet gluten content and E2 had the highest protein ratio and wet gluten content. Across six environments, the gluten index varied from the lowest in E2 (74.8%), and the highest was 94.5 in E1. The lowest sedimentation was in E4 (42.2 ml) and the highest was in 47.0 ml in E5.
___
- Altay F, (2012). Yield stability of some Turkish winter
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes in the
transitional zone of Turkey. Turkish
Journal of Field Crops, 2012, 17(2): 129-134
Awestern nonymous, (1972). ICC.Standard methods of the
international association for cereal chemistry
(ICC). Methods No. 106/2. Vienna Verlag Moritz
Schafer. Detmold, Germany.
- Anonymous, (1984). ICC.Standard methods of the
international association for cereal chemistry
(ICC). Methods No. 116/1. Vienna Verlag Moritz
Schafer. Detmold, Germany.
- Anonymous, (1990). AACC Approved Methods of the
American Association of Cereal Chemist, USA.
- Anonymous, (2002). International Association for
Cereal Sci. and Technology. (ICC Standart No:
110, Standart No: 105, Standart No: 106, Standart
No: 155, Standart No: 116, Standart No: 115). (in
Turkish)
- Arya RK, Munjal R and Dhanda SS, (2012). Evaluation
of bread, durum and synthetic wheat and triticale
for physiological traits under heat stress conditions.
In: National seminar on sustainable agriculture and
food security: challenges in changing climate,
March, 27-28, 2012 at CCSHAU, Hisar.
- Ayranci R and Bagci SA, (2020). Utilization of Stress
Tolerant Local Genotypes in Wheat Breeding
Program in Context to Global Climate Change.
Ekin J. 6(1):11-26, 2020.
- Blakeney AB, Cracknell RL, Crosbie GB, Jefferies SP,
Miskelly DM, O’Brien L, Panozzo JF, Suter DAI,
Solah V, Watts T, Westcott T, and Williams RM,
(2009). Understanding Wheat Quality. p:8. GRDC,
Kingston, Australia.
- Chapagain T and Good A, (2015). Yield and Production
Gaps in Rainfed Wheat, Barley, and Canola in
Alberta. Front. Plant Sci.6:990. doi:10.3389/
fpls.2015.00990
- Coventry DR, Gupta RK, Poswal RS, Chhokar RS,
Sharma RK, Yadav VK, Gill SC, Mehta A,
Kleemann SGL, Bonamano A, Cummins JA,
(2011). Wheat quality and productivity as affected
by varieties and sowing time in Haryana, India.
Field Crops Research, v. 123, n. 3, p. 214-225.
- Eberhart SA and Russell WA, (1969). Yield stability for
a 10-line diallel of single-cross and double-cross
maize hybrids. Crop Sci. 9, 357–361.
- Fernie E, Tan DKY, Liu SY, Ullah N and Khoddami
A, (2022). Post-Anthesis Heat Influences Grain
Yield, Physical and Nutritional Quality in Wheat:
A Review. Agriculture, 12, 886. https://doi.
org/10.3390/agriculture12060886
- Finlay GJ, Bullock PR, Sapirstein HD, Naeem HA,
Hussain A, Angadi SV, Depauw RM, (2007).
Genotypic and environmental variation in grain,
flour, dough and bread-making characteristics of
western Canadian spring wheat. Canadian Journal
of Plant Science 87 (4): 679-690.
- Finlay KW and Wilkinson GN, (1963). The Analysis of
Adaptation in a Plant Breeding Programme. Aust.
J. Agric.Res., 14: 742-754.
- Gomez KA and Gomez AA, (1984). Statistical
Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Ed. John
Willey and Sons, Inc. New York. 641.
- Kant S, Lamba RAS, Arya RK and Panwar IS, (2014).
Effect of terminal heat stress on stability of
yield and quality parameters in bread wheat in
southwest Haryana. Journal of Wheat Researc.
6(1):64-73.
- Kaur V, Singh S and Behl RK, (2016). Heat and drought
tolerance in wheat: Integration of physiological
and genetic platforms for better performance under
stress. Ekin J. 2(1):1-14.
- Lerner SE, Seghezzo ML, Molfese ER, Ponzio NR,
Cogliatti M, and Rogers WJ, (2006). N- and Sfertilisers effects on grain composition, industrial
quality and end-use in durum wheat. Journal of
Cereal Science, 44, 2–11.
- Pena RJ, (2008). Improving or preserving bread
making quality while enhancing grain yield in
wheat. International Symposium on Wheat Yield
Potential: Challenges to International Wheat
Breeding. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT. p: 171-174.
- Perten H, (1990). Rapid Measurement of Wheat Gluten
Quality by the Gluten Index, Cereal Foods World,
35: 401-402.
- Peterson CJ, Graybosch RA, Shelton DR and Baenziger
PS, (1998). Baking quality of hard red winter
wheat: Response of cultivars to environments in
the Great Plains. Euphytica 100 (1-3): 157-162.
- Rogers WJ, Cogliatti M, and Lerner SE, (2006). Effects
of nitrogen and sulfur fertilizers on gliadin
composition of several cultivars of durum wheat.
Cereal Chemistry, 83, 677–683.
- Sissons MJ, Egan NE, and Gianibelli MC, (2005).
New insights into the role of gluten on durum
pasta quality using reconstitution method. Cereal
Chemistry, 82, 601–608.
- Yan W, Holland JB, (2010). A Heritability-adjusted GGE
biplot for test environment evaluation. Euphytica,
v. 171, n. 3, p. 355-369.
- Zadoks J, Chang T, and Konzak C, (1974). A decimal
code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed
research 14:415-421