Esen UZUNTİRYAKİ, Cansel KADIOĞLU, Yeşim AYDIN ÇAPA

Development of self-regulatory strategies scale (SRSS)

Bu çalışmanın amacı, lise öğrencilerinin ders çalışırken kullandıkları özdüzenleyici öğrenme stratejilerini ölçmek için bir ölçek geliştirmektir. Pilot çalışmada ölçek 422 öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. Açıklayıcı faktör analizi sonuçları, ölçeğin sekiz faktörden oluştuğunu göstermiştir. Bu faktörler, motivasyon düzenleme, çaba düzenleme, plan yapma, dikkat toplama, özetleme, vurgulama, ek kaynakları kullanma ve özyönlendirmedir. Geçerlilik çalışmasında ölçeğin 29 maddelik son hali 616 öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonuçları,sekiz faktörlü yapıyı doğrulamıştır. Her bir faktör için Cronbach Alfa iç güvenirlik katsayısı ise .68 ile .82 aralığında değişmiştir. Ek olarak çok değişkenli varyans analizi sonucunda cinsiyet farkı olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Sonuçlar, Özdüzenleyici Öğrenme Stratejileri Ölçeği’nden elde edilen puanların güvenilirliği ve geçerliği hakkında kanıtlar sağlamıştır.

Özdüzenleyici öğrenme stratejileri ölçeğinin (ÖÖSÖ) geliştirilmesi

The purpose of this study was to develop a scale assessing high school students’ use of selfregulatory strategies while studying. In the pilot study, the scale was administered to 422 students. Eight factors were obtained through explanatory factor analysis: namely, motivation regulation, effort regulation, planning, attention focusing, summary strategy, highlighting strategy, using additional resources, and self-instruction. In the validation study, the 29-item final version of the scale was administered to 616 students. Results of confirmatory factor analysis confirmed eight factor solution. The Cronbach’s alpha for each factor ranged from .68 to .82. Additionally, results of Multivariate Analysis of Variance revealed significant gender differences. Findings provided some evidence for the validity and reliability of the Self-Regulatory Strategies Scale scores.

PDF

___

Ablard, K. E., & Lipschultz, R. E. (1998). Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students: Relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 94–101.
Arsal, Z. (2009). The impact of self-regulation instruction on mathematics achievements and attitudes of elementary school students. Education and Science, 34(152). 3-14.
Arsal, Z. (2010). The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(1), 85-103.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Cohen. J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010) Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
Hair, J.F.J., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2005). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Haşlaman, T., & Aşkar, P. (2007). Investigating the relationship between self-regulated learning strategies and achievement in a programming course. Hacettepe University Journal Education, 32, 110-122.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kadioğlu,C., Uzuntiryaki, E. & Capa Aydin, Y. (2006). A Qualitative Study on Tenth Grade Students’ Self-Regulatory Skills. VII. National Science and Mathematics Education Conference, Gazi University, Ankara: Turkey
Karadeniz, Ş., Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., & Demirel F. (2008). The Turkish adaptation study of motivated strategies for Learning questionnaire (MSLQ) for 12–18 year old children: Results of confirmatory factor analysis. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4), 108-117.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 37 (1), 17-25.
Middleton, M.J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: an unexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 710-718.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Orhan, F. (2008). Self-regulation strategies used in a practicum course: A study of motivation and teaching self –efficacy. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 35, 251-262.
Özgüven, İ. E. (2004). Psikolojik testler. Ankara: PDREM Yayınları.
Pape, S. J., & Wang, C. (2003). Middle school children’s strategic behavior: Classification and relation to academic achievement and mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 31, 419-449.
Pape, S. J., Bell, C.V., & Yetkin, I. E. (2003). Developing mathematical thinking and self-regulated learning: A teaching experiment in a seventh-grade mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53, 179-202.
Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 35, 89-101.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1991). A Manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning., The University of Michigan.
Pokay, P., & Blumenfeld, P.C. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 41- 50.
Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13-32.
Rao, N., Moely, B. E., & Sachs, J. (2000).Motivational beliefs, study strategies, and mathematics attainment in high- and low-achieving Chinese secondary school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(3), 287–316.
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman B. J. (1997). Social Origins of Self-Regulatory Competence. Educational Psychologist, 32(4), 195-208.
Sperling R. A., Howard B. C., Staley R., & DuBois N. (2004) Metacognition and Self Regulated Learning Constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 117-139.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Tezbaşaran, A. A. (2008).Likert tipi ölçek hazırlama kılavuzu. (3rd ed.). [Adobe Reader version]. Retrieved from http://www.pdrciyiz.biz/likert-tipi-olcek-hazirlama-klavuzu-ekitap- t8419.html
Winne, P. H. (1997). Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 397-410.
Wolters, C. A. (1999). The relationship between high school students’ motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 281-299.
Yumusak, N., Sungur, S. & Cakiroglu, J. (2007). Turkish high school students’ biology achievement in relation to academic self-regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(1), 53 – 69.
Yükseltürk, E., & Bulut, S. (2009). Gender Differences in Self-Regulated Online Learning Environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (3), 12–22.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Ziedner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Second Edition. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspectives. (pp. 1-37). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S. & Kovach R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington: APA.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M., (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.
Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.
Zusho A., Pintrich P. R., & Coppalo, B.(2003). Skill and will: the role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1081- 1094.