___

• Anderson, R. E. ve Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 49-82.
• Anderson, J. C. ve Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
• Aşkar, P. ve Usluel, Y. K. (2003). A longitudinal study related to the rate of adoption of computers: Comparison of three schools. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 24, 15-24.
• Banoğlu, K. (2011). Okul müdürlerinin teknoloji liderliği yeterlikleri ve teknoloji koordinatörlüğü. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11(1), 199-213.
• Bebell, D., Russell, M. ve O'Dwyer, L. (2004). Measuring teachers' technology uses: Why multiple measures are more revealing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 45-63.
• Bulach, C., Boothe, D. ve Pickett, W. (2006). Analyzing the leadership behavior of school principals. http://cnx.org/content/m13813/latest/ adresinden erişildi.
• Butler, D. ve Sellborn, M. (2002). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning. Educase Quarterly, 25(2), 22-28.
• Bülbül, T. ve Çuhadar, C. (2012). Okul yöneticilerinin teknoloji liderliği öz-yeterlik algıları ile bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerine yönelik kabulleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 474-499.
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
• Camburn, E., Goldring, E., Supovitz, J., Spillane, J. ve Barnes, C. (2005). Study of school leadership school staff questionnaire: Consortium for policy research in education. Michigan: Institute for Social Research University of Michigan.
• Can, T. (2008). İlköğretim okulları yöneticilerinin teknolojik liderlik yeterlilikleri. 8. Uluslararası Eğitim Teknolojileri Konferansı, 6-9 Mayıs, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
• Cavanagh, R. F., MacNeill, N. ve Reynolds, P. (2004). School culture: Connections and disconnections. Practising Administrator, 26(3), 30-33.
• Celep, C. ve Tülübaş, T. (2014). Effect of principals' technological leadership on teachers' attitude towards the use of educational technologies. D. Passey ve A. Tatnall (Ed.), Key Competencies in ICT and Informatics içinde (s. 247-258). New York: Springer.
• Chang, I. H. (2012). The effect of principals' technological leadership on teachers' technological literacy and teaching effectiveness in Taiwanese elementary schools. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 328-340.
• Chang, I. ve Hsu, C. (2009). Research on the path of the influence of principals' technology leadership on teachers' information technology literacy in metropolitan elementary schools. Journal of Elementary Education, 33, 1-32.
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(2), 319-340.
• Davidson, J. ve Olsen, M. (2003). School leadership in networked schools: Deciphering the impact of large technical systems on education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(3), 261-281.
• Davis, N., Preston, C. ve Sahin, I. (2009). ICT teacher training: evidence for multilevel evaluation from a national initiative. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 135-148.
• Demiraslan, Y. ve Usluel, Y. K. (2008). ICT integration processes in Turkish schools: Using activity theory to study issues and contradictions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 458- 474.
• Dexter, S. L., Anderson, R. E. ve Ronnkvist A. M. (2002). Quality technology support: What is it? Who is it? And what difference does it make? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(3), 265-285.
• Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.
• Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.
• Ertmer, P. A. ve Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255- 284.
• Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 39-50.
• Hacıfazlıoğlu, O., Karadeniz, S. ve Dalgıç, G. (2011). Eğitim yöneticileri teknoloji liderliği öz-yeterlik ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 17(2), 145-166.
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. ve Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Hew, K. F. ve Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.
• Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods and Research, 11, 325-344.
• Hoy, W. ve Miskel, C. (2008). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Hoy, W., Tarter, C. ve Kottkamp, R. (1991). Open schools/health Schools: Measuring organizational climate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.
• Inan, F. A. ve Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137-154.
• ISTE. (2009). ISTE standards for administrators. Retrieved April 27, 2016, from http://www.iste.org/standards/ISTE-standards
• Kabakçı-Yurdakul, I., Ursavaş, Ö. F. ve Becit-İşçitürk, G. (2014). An integrated approach for preservice teachers' acceptance and use of technology: UTAUT-PST Scale. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 55, 21-36.
• Karaca, F., Can, G. ve Yıldırım, S. (2013). A path model for technology integration into elementary school settings in Turkey. Computers & Eduation, 68, 353-365.
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
• Koc, M. (2013). Student teachers' conceptions of technology. A metaphor analysis. Computers & Education, 68, 1-8.
• Lim, C. P., Teo, Y. H., Wong, P., Khine, M. S., Chai, C. S. ve Divaharan, S. (2003). Creating a conducive learning environment for the effective integration of ICT: Classroom management issues. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14(4), 405-423.
• Lowther, D. L. ve Ross, S. M. (2000).Teacher Technology Questionnaire (TTQ). Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Educational Policy, The University of Memphis.
• Marulcu, İ. (2010). Eğitimsel liderlik ve teknoloji kullanımı (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Isparta.
• Mazman, S. G. ve Usluel, Y. K. (2011). Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin öğrenme-öğretme süreçlerine entegrasyonu: Modeller ve göstergeler. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 1(1), 62-79.
• Nunnally, J. C. ve Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
• Pacey, A. (2000). The culture of technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37, 163-178.
• Piper, D. ve Hardesty, J. (2005). The influence of school leadership and self-efficacy on teachers' attitudes towards using computer technology in the classroom. C. Crawford vd. (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference içinde (s. 1837-1844). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
• Robinson, W. I. (2003). External, and internal factors which predict teachers' computer usage in K-12 classrooms (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Wayne State University, Detroit.
• Sahin, I. ve Thompson, A. (2007) Analysis of predictive factors that influence faculty members' technology adoption level. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(2), 167-190.
• Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (4. ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Shiue, Y. M. (2007). Investigating the sources of teachers' instructional technology use through the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4), 425-453.
• Sincar, M. ve Aslan, B. (2011). İlköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin teknoloji liderliği rollerine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Gaziantep University-Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), 571-595.
• Şahin, S. (2004). Okul müdürlerinin dönüşümcü ve sürdürümcü liderlik stilleri ile okul kültürü arasındaki ilişkiler (İzmir İli Örneği) (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
• Şahin, S. (2011a). Öğretimsel liderlik ve okul kültürü arasındaki ilişki (İzmir ili örneği). Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11(4), 1909-1928.
• Şahin, S. (2011b). An aspect on the school culture in Turkey and the United States. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(4), 593-607.
• Şişman-Eren, E. (2010). İlköğretim okullarında görev yapan okul müdürlerinin okullarında eğitim teknolojilerini sağlama ve kullanmada gösterdikleri liderlik davranışları (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
• Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
• Teo, T. (2010a). A case for using structural equation modelling (SEM) in educational technology research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), E89-E91.
• Teo, T. (2010b). Using structural equation modelling (SEM) in educational technology research: Issues and guidelines. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), E117-E119.
• Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57, 2432-2440.
• Tezci, E. (2011). Turkish primary school teachers' perceptions of school culture regarding ICT integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(3), 429-443.
• Usluel, Y. K., Aşkar, P. ve Baş, T. (2008). A structural equation model for ICT usage in higher education. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 262-273.
• Van Braak, J., Tondeur, J. ve Valcke, M. (2004). Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(4), 407-422.
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. ve Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
• Wang, Q. ve Woo, H. L. (2007). Systematic planning for ICT integration in topic learning. Educational Technology & Society, 10(1), 148-156.
• Watts, C. D. (2009). Technology leadership, school climate, and technology integration: A correlation study in K-12 public schools (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
• Windschitl, M. ve Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers' use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 165-205.
• Yorulmaz, A. ve Can, S. (2016). The technology leadership competencies of elementary and secondary school directors. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 11(1), 47-61.
• Zhao, Y. ve Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807-840.