Water Stress in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Anahtar Kelimeler:

-

Pamukta (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Su Stresi

Keywords:

-,

___

  • Ackerson, R.C. 1980. Stomatal response of cotton to water stress and abscisic acid as affected by water stress history. Plant Physiol. 69: 455-459.
  • Allen, R. 1995. Dissection of oxidative stress tolerance using transgenic plants. Plant Physiol. 107:1049-1054.
  • Ball, R.A., D.M. Oosterhuis, and A. Mauromoustakos. 1994. Growth dynamics of the cotton plant during water-deficit stress. Agron. J. 86:788-795.
  • Basal, H., C.W. Smith,P.S. Thaxton, and J.K. Hemphill. 2005. Seedling drought tolerance in upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.) Crop Sci. 45: 2 (in press).
  • Basal, H., P. Bebeli, C.W. Smith, and P. Thaxton. 2003. Root growth parameters of converted race stocks of upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.) and two BC2F2 populations. Crop Sci. 43: 1983-1988.
  • Bland, W.L., and W.A. Dugas. 1989. Cotton root growth and soil water extraction. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53:1850-1855.
  • Bohnert, H.J., D.E. Nelson, and R.G. Jensen. 1995. Adaptations to environmental stress. Plant Cell 7, 1099-1111.
  • Borel, C., and T. Simonneau. 2002. Is the ABA concentration in the sap collected by pressurizing leaves relevant for analyzing drought effects on stomata? Evidence from ABA-fed leaves of transgenic plants with modified capacities to synthesize ABA. J. Exp. Bot. 53 (367): 287-296.
  • Cook, C.G. 1985. Identifying root traits among MAR and non-MAR cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. cultivars that relate to performance under limited moisture conditions. Master Thesis. Texas A&M University, USA.
  • Cook, C.G., and K.M. El-Zik. 1993. Fruiting and lint yield of cotton cultivars under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions. Field Crops Res. 33:411-421.
  • Cushman, J.C., and H.J. Bohnert. 2000. Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. Plant Biology. 3: 117-124.
  • Guinn, G., J.R. Dunlap, and D.L. Brummett. 1990. Influence of water deficit on the abscisic acid and indole-3-acetic acid contents of cotton flower buds and flowers. Plant Physiol. 93:1117-1120.
  • Hartung, W., S. Wilkinson, and W.J. Davis. 1998. Factors that regulate abscisic acid concentrations at the primary site of action at the guard cell. J. Exp. Bot. 49: 361-367.
  • Howard, D.D., C.O. Gwathney, G.M. Lessman, and R.K. Roberts. 2001. Fertilizer additive rate and plant growth regulator effects on cotton. J. Cotton Sci. 5:42-52.
  • Hurd, E.A., and E.D. Spratt. 1975. Root patterns in crops related to water and nutrition uptake. p. 167-235. In U.S. Gupta (ed.) Physiological Aspects of Dryland Farming. Oxford & IBH Publ. Co., New Delhi.
  • Ingram, J., and D. Bartels. 1996. The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47:377-403.
  • Jordan, W.R., P.J. Shouse, A. Blum, F.R. Miller, and R.L. Monk. 1984. Environmental physiology of sorghum: II Epicuticular wax load and cuticular transpiration. Crop Sci. 24: 1168-1173.
  • Koheil, M.A.H., S.H. Hilal, T.S. El-Alfy, and E. Leistner. 1992. Quaternary ammonium compounds in intact plants and cell suspension cultures of Atriplex semibaccata and A. halinus during osmotic stress. Phytochemistry 31, 2003-2008.
  • Krieg, D.R. 1997. Genetic and environmental factors affecting productivity of cotton. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf. p: 1347.
  • Lacape, M.J., J. Wery, and D.J.M. Annerosa. 1998. Relationship between plant and soil water status in five field-growing cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars. Field Crops Res. 57:29-48.
  • Leidi, E.O., M. Lopez, J. Gorham, and J.C. Gutierrez. 1999. Variation in carbon isotope discrimination and other traits to drought tolerance in upland cotton cultivars under dryland conditions. Field Crops Res. 61: 109-123.
  • Lewitt, J. 1980. Responses of plants to environmental stress. Vol. II. Water, Radiation, Salt and Others. Academic Press, New York, p. 395-434.
  • Malik, R.S., J.S. Dhankar, and N.C. Turner. 1979. Influence of soil water deficits on root growth of cotton seedlings. Plant and Soil. 53:109-115.
  • McCarty, J.C., Jr., and J.N. Jenkins. 1993. Registration of 79 day-neutral primitive cotton germplasm lines. Crop Sci. 33:351.
  • McMichael, B.L., D.M. Oosterhuis, J.C. Zack, and C.A. Beyrouty. 1999. Growth and development of root system, in J.M. Stewart, D.M. Oosterhuis, and J. Heitholt (eds.), Cotton Physiology. Book II. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN.
  • McMichael, B.L., J.E. Quisenberry, and D.R. Upchurch. 1987. Lateral root development in exotic cotton. Environ. Exp. Bot. 27:499-502.
  • McWilliams, Denise. 2004. Drought Strategies for Cotton. Cooperative Extension Service Circular 582 College of Agriculture and Home Economics http://www.cahe.nmsu.edu/pubs/circulars/CR582.pdf. Erişim:October 2004.
  • Moffat, A. S. (2002). Finding new ways to protect drought-stricken plants. Science Magazine, May issue.
  • Morgan, J.M. and M.K. Tan. 1996. Chromosomal location of a wheat osmoregulation gene using RFLP analysis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. 23:803
  • Naidu, B.P., D.F. Cameron, and S.V. Konduri. 1998. Improving drought tolerance of cotton by glycinebetaine application and selection. Proceedings of the 9th Australian Agronomy Conference, Wagga wagga.
  • Nepomuceno, A.L., D.M. Oosterhuis, and J.M. Stewart. 1998. Physiological response of cotton leaves and roots to water deficit induced by polyethylene glycol. Env. Exp. Bot. 40 (1) 29-41.
  • Nepomuceno, A.L., J.M. Stewart, D. Oosterhuis, R. Turley, N. Nevmaier, and J.R.B. Farias. 2000. Isolation of a cotton NADP(H) oxidase homologue induced by drought stress. Pesq. Agropec. Brasilia. 35(7):1407-1416.
  • Osmond, C.B., M.P. Austin, J.A. Berry, W.D. Billings, and W.E. Winner. 1987. Stress physiology and distribution of plants. Bioscience 37:38-48.
  • Pace, P.F., H.T. Cralle, S.H.M. El-Halawany, J.T. Cothren, and S.A. Senseman. 1999. Drought-induced changes in shoot and root growth of young cotton plants. J. Cotton Sci. 3:183-187.
  • Pettigrew, W.T. 2004. Moisture deficit effect on cotton lint yield, yield components, and boll distribution. Agron. J. 96:377-383.
  • Plaut, Z., A. Carmi, and A. Grava. 1996. Cotton root and shoot response to subsurface drip irrigation and partial wetting of the upper soil profile. Irrig. Sci. 16 (3):107-113.
  • Prior, S.A., H.H. Rogers, G.B. Runion, B.A. Kimball, J.R. Mauney, K.F. Lewin, J. Nagy, and G.R. Hendry. 1995. Free-air carbon dioxide enrichment of cotton: root morphological characteristics. J. Environ. Qual. 24 (4):678-683.
  • Quisenberry, J.E., B. Roark, and B.L. McMichael. 1982. Use of transpiration decline curves to identify drought-tolerant cotton germplasm. Crop Sci. 22:918-922.
  • Quisenberry, J.E., W.R. Jordan , B.A. Roark, and D.W. Fryrear. 1981. Exotic cotton as genetic sources for drought resistance. Crop Sci. 21:889-895.
  • Radin, J.W. and D.L.Hendrix. 1988. The apoplastic pool of abscisic acid in cotton leaves in relation to stomatal closure. Planta. 174:180-186.
  • Reddy, K.R., H.F. Hodges, and J.M. McKinion. 1996. Food and agriculture in the 21st century. World Res. Rev. 8:80-97.
  • Richards, R.A., H.M. Rawson, and D.A. Jhonson. 1986. Glaucousness in wheat: Its development and affect on water-use efficiency, gas exchange and photosynthetic tissue temperatures. Austral. J. Plant Physiol. 13:465-473.
  • Roark, B., and J.E. Quisenberry. 1977. Evaluation of cotton germplasm for drought resistance. p. 49-50. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Conf.. Natl. Cotton Coun. Memphis, TN, USA.
  • Saranga, Y., C.X. Jiang, R.J. Wright, D. Yakır, and A.H. Paterson. 2004. Genetic dissection of cotton physiological response to arid conditions and their inter- relationships with productivity. Plant, Cell, and Environment. 27:263-277.
  • Schroeder J.I., G.J. Allen., V. Hugouvieux, J.M. Kwak, and D. Waner. 2001. Guard cell signal transduction. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 52: 627-658.
  • Sunkar R., D. Bartels, H.H. Kirch. 2003. Overexpression of a stress-inducible aldehyde dehydrogenase gene from Arabidopsis thaliana in transgenic plants improves stress tolerance. Plant J. 35(4):452-64.
  • Taylor, H.M., and B. Klepper. 1974. Water relationship of cotton. 1. Root growth and water use as related to top growth and soil water content. Agron. J. 66:584
  • Tuberosa, R., M.C. Sanguineti, P. Landi, S. Salvi, E. Casarini, and S. Conti. 1998. RFLP mapping of quantitative loci controlling abscisic acid concentration in leaves of drought- stressed maize (Zea mays L.) Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 97: 744-755.
  • Ulloa, M., R.G. Cantrell, R.G. Percy, E. Zeiger and Z. Lu. 2000. QTL analysis of stomatal conductance and relationship to lint yield in an interspecific cotton. Journal of Cotton Sci., 4:10-18.
  • Voloudakis, A.E., S.A. Kosmas, S. Tsakas, E. Eliopoulos, M. Loukas, K. Kosmidou. 2002. Expression of selected drought-related genes and physiological response of Greek cotton genotypes. Functional Plant Biology. 29(10): 1237- 1245.
  • Xu, X., and H.M. Taylor. 1992. Increase in drought resistance of cotton seedling treated with Mepiquat Chloride. Agron. J. 84:569-574.
  • Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., M. Kasuga, Q. Liu, K. Nakashima, Y. Sakuma, H. Abe, Z.K. Shinwari, M. Seki, K. Shinozaki. 2002. Biological mechanisms of drought stress response. JIRCAS Working Report p:1-8.
  • Yang, R.C., S. Jana, and J.M., Clarke. 1991. Phenotypic diversity and Association of some potentially drought-responsive characters in drum wheat. Crop. Sci. 31:1484-1491.
  • Zhao, D., and D. Oosterhuis. 1997. Physiological response of growth chamber-grown cotton plants to the plant growth regulators PGR-IV under water-deficient dtress. Environ. and Exp. Botany. 38:7-14.
Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1018-8851
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1964
  • Yayıncı: Prof. Dr. Banu YÜCEL
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Peynir Teknolojisinde Enterokoklar –I: Biyokimyasal Özellikleri ve Peynir Teknolojisindeki Önemleri

Oğuz GÜRSOY, Özer KINIK

Manisa İlinde Sanayi Domatesi Üretim Alanlarında Görülen Thysanoptera Takımına Ait Türlerin Saptanması Üzerinde Araştırmalar

Yusuf KARSAVURAN, Mustafa GÜCÜK

İzmir İlinde Süt ve Süt Ürünleri İşleyen ve Pazarlayan İşletmelerin Bazı Özellikleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Ayşe UZMAY, Nursel KOYUBENBE, Yusuf KONCA

The Studies on the Determination of Species of Thysanoptera in Processing Tomato Production Areas in İzmir (Bergama, Kınık) Province of Turkey

Sumru ELTEZ, Yusuf KARSAVURAN, Enver DURMUŞOĞLU

Peynir Teknolojisinde Enterokoklar –I: Biyokimyasal Özellikleri ve Peynir Teknolojisindeki Önemleri

Oğuz GÜRSOY, Özer KINIK

Peynir Teknolojisinde Enterokoklar –II: Koruyucu ve Probiyotik Kültür Olarak Kullanımları

Oğuz GÜRSOY, Özer KINIK

Yeryüzü Kaynak Potansiyelinin Uydu Verileri Bağlamında CORINE Sistemine Göre Belirlenmesi Üzerne Bir Çalışma

Nilüfer Eryiğit URFALI, Ünal ALTINBAŞ

Thrips tabaci (Lindeman) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)'nin İzmir İlinde Sanayi Domatesi Alanlarında Populasyon Değişiminin Belirlenmesi Üzerinde Araştırmalar

Sumru ELTEZ, Yusuf KARSAVURAN

Uzaktan Algılama ile Bitki Su Tüketiminin Zamansal ve Alansal Değişiminin Belirlenmesi: Menemen Sulama Birlikleri Örneği

Bekir S. KARATAŞ, Erhan AKKUZU, Şerafettin &ACİRC;ŞIK

Water Stress in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Hüseyin BAŞAL, Aydın ÜNAY