Koronavirüs anksiyete ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği: hemşireler için Türkçeye uyarlanması

Amaç: Çalışmamızın amacı, Koronavirüs anksiyete ölçeğinin hemşireler için Türkçe versiyonunun geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: İçerik geçerlilik indeksi (CVI), principles component analizi, Cronbach's alpha, paralel form ve test-tekrar test yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: CVI 0,98 (0,96-0,99) olarak bulunmuştur. Tek faktörlü çözüm belirlenmiş ve ölçekteki maddelerin faktör yükleri 0.636 ile 0.893 arasındadır. Cronbach alfa değeri 0,84 olarak bulunmuştur. Sınıf içi korelasyon Katsayısı 0,84 ile 0,92 arasında bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Hemşireler için koronavirüs anksiyete ölçeğinin Türkçe versiyonu, hemşirelerin COVID-19'a yönelik kaygılarını ölçmek için geçerli ve güvenilir bulunmuştur.

Validity and reliability of the coronavirus anxiety scale: Turkish adaptation for nurses

Aim: The purpose of our study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale for Turkish nurses. Materials and Methods: Content validity index (CVI), principles component analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, parallel form, and test-retest methods were used. Results: CVI was 0.98 (0.96-0.99). A one-factor solution was identified and the factor loading of items in scale was between 0.636 and 0.893. The Cronbach’s alpha value was found 0.84. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was between 0.84 to 0.92. Conclusion: Turkish version of the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale for nurses was found to be valid and reliable to measure the anxiety of nurses towards COVID-19.

PDF

___

1. World Health Organization (2020a). Novel Coronavirus (2019nCoV) situation reports [online]. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus 2019/situation reports [Access date: June 2020].
2. World Health Organization (2020b). Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) events as they happen [online]. https:// www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/ events-as-they-happen [Access date: June 2020].
3. COVID-19 Map - Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center, https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html [Access date: June 2020].
4. Cui J, Li F and Shi ZL. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2019; 17 (3): 181-192.
5. Lin CY. Social reaction toward the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Social Health and Behavior 2020; 3 (1): 1.
6. Wu KK, Chan SK, Ma TM. Posttraumatic stress, anxiety, and depression in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies 2005; 18 (1): 39-42.
7. Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G et al. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry research 2020; 112934.
8. Liu S, Yang L, Zhang C et al. Online mental health services in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. The Lancet Psychiatry 2020;7(4): 17-18.
9. Jennings BM, Yeager KA. From Fear to Fortitude: Using the Power Within the Nursing Profession to Fight COVID-19. Nurs Outlook. 2020; 68 (4): 391–32.
10. Lee SA Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: A brief mental health screener for COVID-19 related anxiety. Death studies 2020; 44 (7): 393-401.
11. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of internal medicine 2006; 166 (10): 1092-7.
12. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, et al. Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Annals of internal medicine 2007;146 (5): 317-325.
13. Konkan R, Senormanci O, Guclu O, et al. Validity and Reliability Study for the Turkish Adaptation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Scale. Archives of Neuropsychiatry 2013; 50: 53-8.
14. MAPI Research Institute, Linguistic validation. Available at https://mapi-trust.org/pro_newsletter/mapi-webinar-series/ Accessed June 2020.
15. Bujang, MA, Baharum N A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: a review. Archives of Orofacial Science 2017; 12 (1).
16. Salkind NJ (Ed.) Encyclopedia of research design (Vol. 1). Sage. 2010
17. Yusoff MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. RESOURCE 2019;11 (2).
18. Chan LL, Idris N. Validity and reliability of the instrument using exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 2017; 7 (10): 400-0.
19. Hyuncheol K. A Guide on the Use of Factor Analysis in the Assessment of Construct Validity. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2013; 43 (5).
20. Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International journal of medical education 2011;2: 53.
21. Vaz S, Falkmer T, Passmore AE et al. (The case for using the repeatability coefficient when calculating test–retest reliability. PloS one 2013; 8 (9): 73990. 22. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of chiropractic medicine 2016; 15 (2): 155-163.