___

• Akhan, O., & Altaş, S. (2021). BILSEM history teachers' opinions on BILSEM working conditions. Manisa Celal Bayar University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(1), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.52826/mcbuefd.924337.
• Alig-Mielcarek, J. M. (2003). A model of school success: Instructional leadership, academic press, and student achievement (Doctoral dissertation), The Ohio State University.
• Altintaş, E., & İLGÜN, Ş. (2016). Öğretmenlerin üstün zekâlı öğrencilerin eğitimine yönelik düşünce ve önerileri. Electronic Turkish Studies, 11(14).
• Altun, T., & Vural, S. (2012). Evaluation of the views of teachers and administrators of a science and art center (sac) about professional development and school improvement. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 11 (42), 152-177.
• Atasoy, R. (2020). Sputnik Sendromu. N. Cemaloğlu (Ed.). Sendromların Eğitim ve Yönetime Yansımaları: Mitolojiden Kurama (ss. 45-58). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Atasoy, R., & Özden, C. (2021). Bilim ve sanat merkezlerine yönelik öğretmen görüşleri ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Journal of Global Sport and Education Research, 4 (1), 1-16.
• Banks, J. A., Banks, C. A. M. (Eds.). (2010). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives. John Wiley.
• Baş, G. (2021). Teacher Beliefs about Educational Reforms: A Metaphor Analysis. International Journal of Educational Reform, 30(1), 21-38.
• Birgit, E. (2011). Supportive and hindering factors to a sustainable implementation of ICT in schools. Journal for Educational Research Online, (3)1, 75-103.
• Blasé, J., & Blase, J. (2003). Handbook of instructional leadership: How successful principals promote teaching and learning. California: Corwin Press.
• Blömeke, S., Houang, R., Hsieh, F. J., & Wang, T. Y. (2017). Effects of job motives, teacher knowledge and school context on beginning teachers’ commitment to stay in the profession: A longitudinal study in Germany, Taiwan and the United States. In G. K. LeTendre & M. Akiba (Eds.), International handbook of teacher quality and policy (pp. 374–387). London: Routledge
• Bozan, İ. & Savi-Çakar, F. (2020). Bilim ve sanat merkezi öğretmenlerinin yaşadıkları sorunlar ve bu sorunlara ilişkin çözüm önerilerinin belirlenmesi. Turkish Studies Education, 15(3), 160
• Bush, T. (2018). Eğitim Liderliği ve Yönetimi Kuramları (Çev. Ed.: R. Sarpkaya). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
• Cardozo, R. N. (1965). An experimental study of customer effort, expectation, and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Study, 2(3), 244-249.
• Çetin, A., & Doğan, A. (2018). The problems of mathematics teachers working in science and art centers. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 19(4), 615641.
• Chen, C. H., Chen, S. H., Hwang, G. J., & Yang, T. C. (2010). Factors influencing teachers' adoption of a ubiquitous technology application in supporting teacher performance. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 4(1), 39-54.
• Chen, G., & Weikart, L. A. (2008). Student background, school climate, school disorder, and student achievement: An empirical study of New York City's middle schools. Journal of School Violence, 7(4), 3-20.
• Clotfelter, C., Ladd H., & Vigdor, J. (2007). Are teacher absences worth worrying about in the U.S.?, NBER Working Paper Series, No. 136648, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w13648.
• Çoban, Ö (2020). Relationships between students’ socioeconomic status, parental support, students’ hindering, teachers’ hindering and students’ literacy scores: pısa 2018, World Journal of Education, (10)4, 45-59.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. New York, London: Routledge.
• Çoruk, A. (2019). Planlı kalkınma dönemindeki milli eğitim şûra kararlarının kalkınma planlarındaki eğitime ilişkin hedefler çerçevesinde değerlendirilmesi. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 15(4), 297-318.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
• Dahar, M. A., & Faize, F. A. (2011). Effect of the Availability and the use of Science Laboratories on Academic Achievement of Students in Punjab (Pakistan). European Journal of Scientific Research, 51(2), 193-202.
• Desimone, L. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented?. Review of educational research, 72(3), 433-479.
• Dilekçi, Ü., & Limon, İ. (2020). Okul müdürlerinin öğretimsel liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerin mesleki adanmışlıkları arasındaki ilişkide öznel iyi oluşun aracı rolü. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 26(4), 743-798 doi: 10.14527/kuey.2020.017.
• Faizi, W.N., Karim, R. A., & Shakil, A. F. (2019). Availability of Essential Laboratory Equipment for Biology: A Case Study of North Nazimabad Town, Karachi. Journal of Science Education, 1(1), 15-24.
• Gedifew, M. T. (2020). Exploring the instructional leadership development practices in Ethiopia. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(3), 402-410.
• Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109, 877-896.
• Graham, K. E. (2013). Mathematics and science acceleration in grade eight: School leaders’ perceptions and satisfaction (Publication No. 3559255) [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
• Güneş, A. (2018). Türkiye’de bilim sanat merkezleri. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(6), 185-193.
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 9(2): 157–191.
• Hallinger, P., & Wang, W.C. (2015). Assessing instructional leadership with the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
• Hallinger, P., Gümüş, S., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2020). 'Are principals instructional leaders yet?'A science map of the knowledge base on instructional leadership, 1940–2018. Scientometrics, 122(3), 1629-1650. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03360-5
• Hamilton, R., McCoach, D. B., Tutwiler, S. M., Siegle, D., Gubbins, E. J., Callahan, C. M., Broderson, A. V., Mun, R. U. (2018). Disentangling the roles of institutional and individual poverty in the identification of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738053
• Hanushek, E. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality, Economics of Education Review, (30)3, 466-479.
• Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hoferichter, F., Hirvonen, R., & Kiuru, N. (2021). The development of school well-being in secondary school: High academic buoyancy and supportive class-and school climate as buffers. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101377.
• Hofman, R. H., de Boom, J., Meeuwisse, M., & Hofman, W. A. (2013). Educational innovation, quality, and effects: An exploration of innovations and their effects in secondary education. Educational Policy, 27(6), 843-866.
• Howard, S., & Mozejko, A. (2015), Teachers: technology, change and resistance, in Henderson, M. and G. Romeo (eds.), Teaching and Digital Technologies: Big Issues and Critical Questions, Cambridge University Press, Port Melbourne, Australia.
• Huong, V. T. M. (2020). Factors Affecting Instructional Leadership in Secondary Schools to Meet Vietnam's General Education Innovation. International Education Studies, 13(2), 48-60.
• İnandı,Y. (2009). The barriers hindering female teachers from becoming school principals. Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 36, 161-178
• Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis, American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.
• Johnson, S. M., Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement, Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1–39.
• Kim, T., & Lee, Y. (2020). Principal instructional leadership for teacher participation in professional development: evidence from Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, (21), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09616-x
• Kır, S., & Akbaşli, S. (2021). Being a teacher in BILSEM: A Sample from Ankara. HAYEF: Journal of Education, 18(2), 193-220.
• Kiuru, N., Pakarinen, E., Vasalampi, K., Silinskas, G., Aunola, K., Poikkeus, A.-M., Metsäpelto, R.-L., Lerkkanen, M.-K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2014). Task-Focused Behavior Mediates the Associations Between Supportive Interpersonal Environments and Students’ Academic Performance. Psychological Science, 25(4), 1018–1024. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613519111
• Kline, R.B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). NewYork, NY: Guilford Press.
• Kotler, P.; Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing Management (12th ed). Prentice Hall: New Jersey, USA.
• Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development, Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805.
• Leaper, C., & Starr, C. R. (2019). Helping and Hindering Undergraduate Women’s STEM Motivation: Experiences With STEM Encouragement, STEM-Related Gender Bias, and Sexual Harassment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318806302
• Leoste, J., Heidmets, M., Ley, T., & Stepanova, J. (2020). Classroom innovation becoming sustainable: A study of technological innovation adoption by Estonian primary school teachers. Interaction Design and Architecture (s) Journal (IxD&A), 47, 144-166.
• Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2022). The effects of instructional leadership, teacher responsibility and procedural justice climate on professional learning communities: A cross-level moderated mediation examination. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 17411432221089185
• Liu, Y., Bellibas M.S., & Printy, S. (2018). How school context and educator characteristics predict distributed leadership: A hierarchical structural equation model with 2013 TALIS data, Educational Management Administration & Leadership 46(3): 401–423.
• Liu, Y., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2020). The Effect of Instructional Leadership and Distributed Leadership on Teacher Self-efficacy and Job Satisfaction: Mediating Roles of Supportive School Culture and Teacher Collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, doi:10.1177/1741143220910438 7-1628
• Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397.
• Martín-García, A. V., Martínez-Abad, F., & Reyes-González, D. (2019). TAM and stages of adoption of blended learning in higher education by application of data mining techniques. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2484-2500.
• Mji, A., & Makgato, M. (2006). Factors associated with high school learners' poor performance: a spotlight on mathematics and physical science, South African Journal of Education, 26(2)253–266.
• Moeketsane, M., Jita, L., & Jita, T. (2021). Correlates of South African subject leaders’ perspectives and their perceived competence on instructional leadership, South African Journal of Education, 41(1).
• Morettini, B. (2021). Forms of resistance: Insights into beginning teacher development. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100041.
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2017). Mplus user's guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables, user's guide. Muthén & Muthén.
• Neihart, M., & Teo, C. T. (2013). Addressing the needs of the gifted in Singapore. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(3), 290-306.
• Ni, G., Xu, H., Cui, Q., Qiao, Y., Zhang, Z., Li, H., & Hickey, P. J. (2021). Influence mechanism of organizational flexibility on enterprise competitiveness: The mediating role of organizational innovation. Sustainability, 13(1), 176.
• OECD, (2013). How the quality of the learning environment is shaped, (Volume IV): What Makes Schools Successful? Resources, Policies and Practices
• OECD, (2016). The school learning environment. PISA 2015 results (Volume II): Policies and practices for successful schools.
• OECD, (2019). Teacher behaviour and student learning. PISA 2018 results (Volume III): What school life means for students’ lives. Oliver, R. L. (1981). Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retail settings. Journal of Rretailing, 57(3), 25-48. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1984-10995-001
• Özdemir, G., Sahin, S., & Öztürk, N. (2020). Teachers' self-efficacy perceptions in terms of school principal's instructional leadership behaviours. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(1), 25-40.
• Özdemir, M. (2018). Eğitim Yönetimi: Alanın Temelleri ve Çağdaş Yönelimler. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Özden, C. ve Atasoy, R. (2021). Sınıfta öğretim. N. Özdemir, S. Turan ve Ö. Çoban (Ed.). 21. yüzyıl okullarını yeniden düşünmek (ss. 229-258). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Porter, A. C. (1994). National standards and school improvement in the 1990s: Issues and promise. American Journal of Education, 102(4), 421-449.
• Rahim, M. N., & Chandran, S. S. C. (2021). Investigating EFL Students’ Perceptions on E-learning Paradigm-Shift During Covid-19 Pandemic. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 3(1), 56-66.
• Rogers, H., & E. Vegas (2009). No more cutting class? Reducing teacher absence and providing incentives for performance, Policy Research Working Papers, No. 4847, The World Bank, http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4847.
• Rupietta, C., Meuer, J., & Backes-Gellner, U. (2021). How do apprentices moderate the influence of organizational innovation on the technological innovation process?. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 13(1), 1-25.
• Sarıtaş, E., Şahin, Ü., & Çatalbaş, G. (2019). Science and Art Centers (SAC) according to the parents. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(1), 114-133.
• Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C., Luyten, H., & Ebbeler, J. (2017). Factors promoting and hindering data-based decision making in schools, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, (28)2, 242-258, DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2016.1256901
• Schleicher, A. (2015). Schools for 21st-Century Learners: Strong Leaders, Confident Teachers, Innovative Approaches. International Summit on the Teaching Profession. OECD Publishing. 2, rue Andre Pascal, F-75775 Paris Cedex 16, France.
• Schleicher, A. (2019). Dünya okulu. 21. yüzyılın okul sistemi nasıl kurgulanmalı. Çev. Ş. Karadeniz). Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Yayınları. İstanbul.
• Segabutla, M. H., & Evans, R. (2019). Lack of lecturer clarity during instruction: Possible reason for poor throughput?. South African Journal of Higher Education, 33(3), 115-131.
• Sharif, U. M. (2020). The role of the principal is developing an instructional leadership team in school. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(11), 662-667.
• Sims, S. (2017). TALIS 2013: Working conditions, teachers’ job satisfaction and retention (Department for Education Statistical Working Paper). London: Department of Education.
• Sung, W., & Kim, C. (2021). A study on the effect of change management on organizational Innovation: Focusing on the mediating effect of members’ innovative behavior. Sustainability, 13(4), 2079.
• Tang, S. Y. F., & Choi, P. L. (2009) Teachers’ professional lives and continuing professional development in changing times. Educational Review, 61(1), 1-18.
• Thomas, C. R., & Gadbois, S. A. (2007). Academic self-handicapping: The role of self-clarity and students' learning strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X79644
• Thomassen, J. P. R. (2007). De klantgerichte overheid: werken aan en voor tevreden burgers en organisaties. Kluwer.
• Thurlings, M., Evers, A.T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers’ innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430-471. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314557949
• Toropova, A., Myrberg E., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teachers’ job satisfaction: the importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics, Educational Review, 73(1), 71-97, DOI: 10.1080/00131911.2019.1705247
• Üzbe, N., & Bacanlı, H. (2015). The role of achievement goal orientation, self-esteem and academic achievement in prediction of self-handicapping. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 13(1), 33-50.
• Watson, P.W.St., Rubie-Davies, J.C.M, Meissel, K., Peterson, E.R., Flint, A., Garrett, L, & McDonald, L. (2019). Teacher gender, and expectation of reading achievement in New Zealand elementary school students: essentially a barrier?, Gender and Education, 31 (8), 1000 1019, doi: 10.1080/09540253.2017.1410108
• Westfall, P. H., & Henning, K. S. S. (2013). Texts in statistical science: Understanding advanced statistical methods. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
• Widodo, H. (2019). The role of school culture in holistic education development in muhammadiyah elementary school sleman yogyakarta, Dinamika Ilmu, 19(2), 265-285
• Yakut Özek, B. (2021). Eğitim reformunun başarısını etkileyen etmenler: Bilsem modelinin politika nitelikleri kuramı bağlamında analizi. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 11(3), 1192-1222.
• Yu, J., & McLellan, R. (2019). Beyond academic achievement goals: The importance of social achievement goals in explaining gender differences in self-handicapping. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 33-44.