Evaluation of Relationships Between Postural and Functional Lateral Preferences and Chewing Side Among Students In Eastern Turkey

This study aims to evaluate the relationships between postural and functional lateral preferences and the preferred chewing side among young subjects. Functional lateral preferences, postural lateral preferences and the preferred chewing side were assessed in 376 young individuals (178 men, 198 women, mean age: 20.07). Of the 376 individuals, 31.1 % were strong right-handers, 58.8 % were weak right-handers, 2.9% were ambidextrous, 5.9% were weak left-handers, 1.3% was strong left-handers. There was a right-side preference for handedness (89.9%), footedness (75.8%), earedness (59.2%), eyedness (paper tube test, 70.0%), eyedness (Rosenbach dominant eye test, 62.9%), hand clapping (78.4%), leg -crossing (64.4%), preferred chewing side (60.9%) and a left-side preference for hand-clasping (55.2%), and arm-folding (55.3%). Only eyedness (paper tube test) differed between the genders; women mostly preferred the left eye when looking through the paper tube. Handedness, footedness, earedness, and eyedness (paper tube) were each related with hand-clapping, however not with hand clasping and arm folding. In addition, hand clapping and leg crossing (but not hand clasping and arm folding) were each related to preferred chewing side. In general, individuals who preferred the right side were right sided in all of the variables, while individuals who preferred the left side were closely related to individuals who preferred both sides. Thus, it can be concluded that individuals who preferred the left side tended to be mostly bilateral, compared with individuals who preferred only the right side. These results may bring insight into the relationships between functional and postural lateral preferences and the preferred chewing side for the young population.

___

1. Pençe S. Serebral Lateralizasyon. Van Tıp Dergisi. 2000;7(3):120-5.

2. Reiss M, Tymnik G, Kogler P, Kogler W, Reiss G. Laterality of hand, foot, eye, and ear in twins. Laterality. 1999;4(3):287-97. doi:10.1080/713754337

3. Mohr C, Thut G, Landis T, Brugger P. Hands, arms, and minds: Interactions between posture and thought. J Clin Exp Neuropsyc. 2003;25(7):1000-10. doi:DOI 10.1076/jcen.25.7.1000.16491

4. Dittmar M. Functional and postural lateral preferences in humans: interrelations and lifespan age differences. Hum Biol. 2002;74(4):569- 85.

5. Guo XL, Lyu YY, Bekrater-Bodmann R, Flor H, Tong SB. Handedness Change after Dominant Side Amputation: Evaluation from a Hand Laterality Judgment Task. Ieee Eng Med Bio. 2015:8002-5.

6. Reiss M, Reiss G. Current aspects of handedness. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1999;111(24):1009-18.

7. Nissan J, Gross MD, Shifman A, Tzadok L, Assif D. Chewing side preference as a type of hemispheric laterality. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(5):412-6. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2842.2004.01256.x

8. Arslan SS, Inal O, Demir N, Olmez MS, Karaduman AA. Chewing side preference is associated with hemispheric laterality in healthy adults. Somatosens Mot Res. 2017;34(2):92-5. doi:10.1080/08990220.2017.1308923

9. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97-113.

10. Geschwind N, Behan P. Left-handedness: association with immune disease, migraine, and developmental learning disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982;79(16):5097-100.

11. Tan U. The distribution of the Geschwind scores to familial left-handedness. Int J Neurosci. 1988;42(1-2):85-105.

12. Barut C, Ozer CM, Sevinc O, Gumus M, Yunten Z. Relationships between hand and foot preferences. Int J Neurosci. 2007;117(2):177-85.

13. Tan U. The distribution of hand preference in normal men and women. Int J Neurosci. 1988;41(1-2):35-55.

14. Lawton CA, Czarnolewski MY, Eliot J. Laterality, sex, and everyday spatial behaviours: an exploratory analysis. Laterality. 2015:1-22. doi:10.1080/1357650X.2015.1081919

15. Rosenbach O. Ueber monokulare Vorherrschaft beim binikularen Sehen. Munch Med Wochenschr. 1903;30:1290-2.

16. Aliosmanoğlu B, & Köçkar, Ç. . Üniversite Öğrencilerinde El Tercihinin ve Dominant Gözün Bazı Hastalıklar ile İlişkisi. . Eur J Basic Med Sci,. 2014; 4(3):53-7.

17. Gürez C. İlimizde Baskın Göz Oranı. Medical Journal of Bakirkoy. 2013;9(2):55-8.

18. Hardyck C, Goldman R, Petrinovich L. Handedness and sex, race, and age. Hum Biol. 1975;47(3):369-75.

19. Tran US, Koller I, Nader IW, et al. Lateral preferences for hand clasping and arm folding are associated with handedness in two large-sample latent variable analyses. Laterality. 2014;19(5):602- 14. doi:10.1080/1357650X.2014.891607

20. Combs AL. Patterns of lateral preference: hand, eye, thumb and clapping. Percept Mot Skills. 1983;57(3 Pt 1):847-50. doi:10.2466/pms.1983.57.3.847

21. Rovira-Lastra B, Flores-Orozco EI, AyusoMontero R, Peraire M, Martinez-Gomis J. Peripheral, functional and postural asymmetries related to the preferred chewing side in adults with natural dentition. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43(4):279-85. doi:10.1111/joor.12369

22. Bicaj T, Pustina T, Ahmedi E, et al. The Relation between the Preferred Chewing Side and Occlusal Force Measured by T-Scan III System. Open Journal of Stomatology. 2015;5(04):95.

23. Ogah I, Stewart E, Treleaven M, Wassersug RJ. Hand clasping, arm folding, and handedness: relationships and strengths of preference. Laterality. 2012;17(2):169-79. doi:10.1080/1357650X.2010.551126
Eastern Journal of Medicine-Cover
  • ISSN: 1301-0883
  • Başlangıç: 1996
  • Yayıncı: ERBİL KARAMAN
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluation of Relationships Between Postural and Functional Lateral Preferences and Chewing Side Among Students In Eastern Turkey

ÖZLEM ERGÜL ERKEÇ, SIDDIK KESKİN

Hook Plate Applications in Type 3 Acromioclavicular Dislocations

SEZAİ ÖZKAN, Cihan ADANAS

Socio-Demographic Determinants of Dental Anxiety and Fear Among College Students

Esin ÖZLEK, ABDULLAH YILDIRIM, Alaettin KOÇ, MURAT BOYSAN

The Use of Phosphate Enema in the Treatment of Short Segment Intussusception Cases

SALİM BİLİCİ, Veli AVCİ

Prevalence of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Following Unintentional Injuries In Children

Mehmet İZ, Veysel ÇERİ, MEHMET EMİN LAYIK, Fatma Betül AY

The Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in The Determination Of Meniscus Tears in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears

MERVE GÜRSOY BULUT, TUĞRUL BULUT, BERNA DİRİM METE, ÖZGÜR TOSUN, Emine Merve HOROZ, SAFA GÜRSOY

Hydrostatic Reduction Supported With External Manuel Reduction In Treatment Of Intussusception: A New Technical Synthesis

BURHAN BEGER, Baran Serdar KIZILYILDIZ, Metin ŞİMŞEK, Ebuzer DÜZ, HÜSEYİN AKDENİZ

Evaluation of Pediatric Patients With Severe Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Serdar EPÇAÇAN, MEHMET GÖKHAN RAMOĞLU, EMRAH ŞİŞLİ, Çayan ÇAKIR, Zerrin KARAKUŞ EPÇAÇAN, Mustafa Orhan BULUT

Evaluation of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Practice of Nurses at a Tertiary Hospital

ATAKAN YILMAZ, EVRİM ŞİMŞEK

Specific and Non-Spesicific Dermatoses Of Pregnancy In The Emergency Department

Mehmet Ali BİLGİLİ, Sevdegül KARADAŞ BİLVANİSİ, SERAP GÜNEŞ BİLGİLİ, AYŞE GÜLER OKYAY, RECEP DURSUN, AYŞE SERAP KARADAĞ