Relational resilience as a protective factor in marital adjustment of couples with cancer: A dyadic model

Objective: Understanding how the relational process progress in the face of chronic risk situation in a marriage is important for the quality of the marriage.The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between relational resilience as a protective factor and marital adjustment for couples with one spouse being a cancer, by employing a dyadic approach. In this study, relational resilience is thought to be a supportive structure in ensuring marital adjustment. Method: One hundred fifty two couples (n=304) with one of the spouses being a cancer patient participated in the study. All participants completed demographic form, relational resilience and marital adjustment measures. This study included the patients who had cancer disease and received outpatient treatment in Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Dr. Ahmet Andicen Oncology Hospital and Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtarslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital. The other inclusion criteria was that the patients were married and the spouses of patients accepted to take survey as well. The study was designed according to the relational screening model. In this way, the effects of resilience of married couples on marital adjustment against cancer disease were investigated by using the Actor-Partner Interdepence Model (APIM). Results: APIM results reveale significant actor and partner effects of cancer patients on marital relations. Results indicated that relational resilience of husband and wife in the face of cancer had positive and significant effects on marital adjustment. The research found that the partner effects on marital adjustment was higher for wives compared to husband. The results demonstrated that each person’s relational resilience is the strongest predictor of their own marital adjustment and the partner’s relational resilience also plays significant role in one’s marital adjustment. Conclusion: The results of the study showed the importance of the actor and partner effects of relational resilience for increasing the marital adjustment and strengthening the relationships. These results were discussed within the context of marriage counseling by taking the cultural structure into consideration.


1. Walsh F. The concept of family resilience: crisis and challenge. Fam Process 1996; 35:261-281.

2. Deshields TL, Heiland MF, Kracen AC, Dua P. Resilience in adults with cancer: development of a conceptual model. Psychooncology 2016; 25:11-18.

3. McCubbin MA, McCubbin HI. Family coping with health crises: The resiliency model of family stress, adjustment, and adaptation: In Danielson CB, Hamel-Bissell B, Winstead-Fry P (editors). Families, health & illness: Perspectives on coping and intervention, New York: Mosby, 1993, 21-64.

4. Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B. The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Dev 2000; 71:543-562.

5. Bonanno GA, Westphal M, Mancini AD. Resilience to loss and potential trauma. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2011; 7:511-535.

6. Zeidner M, Kloda I, Matthews G. Does dyadic coping mediate the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and marital quality? J Fam Psychol 2013; 27:795-805.

7. Masten A.S. Ordinary magic-resilience in development. New York: The Guilford Press, 2014.

8. Chan CMH, Ng CG, Taib NA, Wee LH, Krupat E, Meyer F. Course and predictors of post-traumatic stress disorder in a cohort of psychologically distressed patients with cancer: A 4-year follow-up study. Cancer 2018; 124:406-416.

9. Swartzman S, Booth JN, Munro A, Sani F. Posttraumatic stress disorder after cancer diagnosis in adults: A meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety 2017; 34:327-339.

10. Giacomo DD, Cannita K, Ranieri J, Cocciolone, V, Passafiume D, Ficorella, C. Breast cancer and psychological resilience among young women. J Psychopathol 2016; 22:191-195.

11. Bodenmann, G. Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning: In Revenson T, Kayser K, Bodenmann G (editors). Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2005.

12. Badr H, Carmack CL, Kashy DA, Cristofanilli M, Revenson TA. Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol 2010; 29:169-180.

13. Mehta A, Cohen SR, Chan LS. Palliative care: a need for a family systems approach. Palliat Support Care 2009; 7:235-243.

14. Acitelli LK, Badr H. My illness or our illness? Attending to the relationship when one partner is ill: In Revenson T, Kayser K, Bodenmann G (editors). Emerging perspectives on couples’ coping with stress. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2005,121-136.

15. Alderfer MA, Kazak AE. Family issues when a child is on treatment for cancer: In Brown R (editor). Comprehensive handbook of childhood cancer and sickle cell disease: A biopsychosocial approach New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2006, 53-74.

16. Kim Y, Kashy DA, Wellisch DK, Spillers RL, Kaw CK, Smith TG. Quality of life of couples dealing with cancer: dyadic and individual adjustment among breast and prostate cancer survivors and their spousal caregivers. Ann Behav Med 2008; 35:230-238.

17. Kalayjian A. Coping with cancer: the spouses’ perspective. Arch Psychiat Nurs 1989; 3:166-172.

18. Canary D, Stafford L, Semic BA. A panel study of the associations between maintenance strategies and relational characteristics. J Marriage Fam 2002; 64:395-406.

19. Watts KJ, Sherman KA, Mireskandari S, Meiser B, Taylor A, Tucker K. Predictors of relationship adjustment among couples coping with a high risk of developing breast/ovarian cancer. Psychol Health 2011; 26:21-39.

20. Meier C, Bodenmann G, Mörgeli H, Jenewein J. Dyadic coping, quality of life, and psychological distress among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and their partners. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2011; 6:583-596.

21. Jordan JV. Relational resilience in girls: In S Goldstein, RB Brooks (editors). Handbook of resilience in children. New York, NY: Springer Science/Business Media, 2005; 79-90.

22. Connolly CM. A qualitative exploration of resilience in long-term Lesbian couples. The Fam J 2005; 13: 266-280.

23. Skerrett K. Resilience in couples: A view of the landscape: In Skerrett K, Fergus K (editors). Couple resilience: Emerging perspectives. New York, US: Springer Science, 2015, 3-22.

24. Harju E, Rantanen A, Helminen M, Kaunonen M, Isotalo T, Åstedt-Kurki P. Marital relationship and health-related quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses: A longitudinal clinical study. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27:2633-2639.

25. Manne SL, Siegel S, Kashy D, Heckman CJ. Cancer-specific relationship awareness, relationship communication, and ıntimacy among couples coping with early stage breast cancer. J Soc Pers Relat 2014; 31:314-334.

26. Zunkel G. Relational Coping Processes. J Psychosoc Oncol 2002; 20:39-55.

27. Manne S. Cancer in the marital context: a review of the literature. Cancer Invest 1998; 16:188-202.

28. Erdogan E, Karakas SA. Analysis of sexual life quality and marital satisfaction in women with breast cancer: Turkish sample. Int J of Caring Sci 2019; 12:1497-1505.

29. Mushtaq N, Ali R. Marital satisfaction of breast cancer patients and their spouses: a qualitative study. Pakistan Journal of Women’s Studies: Alam-E-Niswan 2019; 26:65-87.

30. Morgan MA, Small BJ, Donovan KA, Overcash J, McMillan S. Cancer patients with pain: the spouse/partner relationship and quality of life. Cancer Nurs 2011; 34:13-23.

31. Berg CA, Wiebe DJ, Butner J, Bloor L, Bradstreet C, Upchurch R, et al. Collaborative coping and daily mood in couples dealing with prostate cancer. Psychol Aging 2008; 23:505-516.

32. Manne S, Badr H, Zaider T, Nelson C, Kissane D. Cancerrelated communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv 2010 Mar; 4:74-85.

33. Berg CA, Upchurch R. A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychol Bull 2007; 133:920-954.

34. Aydogan D, Ozbay Y. Mediation role of dyadic coping on parenting stress and relational resilience in couples. Marriage and Fam Rev 2018; 54:128-147.

35. Aydogan D, Dincer D. Creating resilient marriage relationships: Self-pruning and the mediation role sacrifice with satisfaction. Current Psychol 2020; 39:500-510.

36. Aydogan D, Ozbay Y. Development of relational resilience scale for married individuals. 13th National Congress of Psychological Counseling and Guidance. Proceeding Book, 2015, 8-10. (Turkish)

37. Tutarel-Kislak S. Reliability and validity of Marital Adjustment Test. 3P Psychiatry, Psychology Psychopharmacology 1999; 7:55- 65. (Turkish)

38. Kenny DA, Cook W. Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Pers Relationship 1999; 6:433-448.

39. Cook W, Kenny D. The Actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. Int J Behav Dev 2005; 29:101-109.

40. Chow M C, Tan C C. Attachment and commitment in dyadic friendships: Mediating roles of satisfaction, quality of alternatives, and investment size. J Relationships Research 2013; 34:1-11.

41. Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic data analysis. New York: The Guildford Press; 2006.

42. Schumacker ER, Lomax GR. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. NJ: Erlbaum, Mahwah; 1996.

43. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. Fourth ed., Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.

44. Bodenmann G, Charvoz L, Cina A, Widmer K. Prevention of marital distress by enhancing the coping skills of couples: 1-year follow-up-study. Swiss J Psychol 2001; 60:3-10.

45. Bodenmann G, Shantinath SD. The Couples Coping Enhancement Training (CCET): A new approach to prevention of marital distress based upon stress and coping. Fam Relat 2004; 53:477-484.

46. Kagıtcibasi C. Self, family and human development: Theory and applications in cultural psychology. Fourth ed., Koc University Publication, 2017. (Turkish)

47. Manne S, Badr H. Intimacy and relationship processes in couples’ psychosocial adaptation to cancer. Cancer 2008; 112(Suppl.11):2541-2555.

Kaynak Göster

  • ISSN: 1018-8681
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1984

5.7b 3.4b

Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Acrophobia treatment with virtual reality-assisted acceptance and commitment therapy: two case reports

Zülal ÇELİK, Furkan Bahadır ALPTEKİN, Fatih Kaasim YAVUZ

Your country is your routine: the evacuation, quarantine, and management of behavioral problems of a child with autism during COVID-19 pandemic

Bahadır TURAN, Murat GÜLŞEN, Onur Burak DURSUN, Nergiz KOCARSLAN

Relational resilience as a protective factor in marital adjustment of couples with cancer: A dyadic model

Hüdayar CİHAN, Didem AYDOĞAN

A brief update on disordered gaming

Cüneyt EVREN

Examining the factor structure of the WISC-IV in clinical and non-clinical samples: a multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis


Emotional regulation and attachment style in previously untreated adolescents with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder


10q distal trisomy and 15q monosomy as a rare genetic cause for intellectual disability


Comparison of social cognition in adolescents diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder


Sexual dysfunction related with carbamazepine treatment: how much do we ask?

Sibel ÜSTÜN ÖZEK, Hazal Ceren AK, Serap ÜÇLER

Associations between neurological soft signs, chronotype and sleep quality in schizophrenia

Esin EVREN KILIÇASLAN, Merve ATILGAN, Mustafa Cankut KURT, Murat BOYSAN, Mustafa GÜLEÇ