Relation of Language Features with Maternal Depression, Family Functioning, and Digital Technology Usage in Children with Developmental Language Delay–Comparison with Healthy Controls

Gelişimsel dil gecikmesi tanısı olan çocuklarda dil özelliklerinin teknolojik alet kullanmaları, aile işlevselliği, anne depresyonu ile ilişkisi ve sağlıklı kontrollerle karşılaştırılması Amaç: Çocukların duygusal, sosyal ve bilişsel gelişiminde dil ve iletişimin önemi çok büyüktür. Gelişimsel dil gecikmesi (GDG) çocukluk döneminin en sık görülen gelişimsel sorunlarından biridir. Bu çalışmada GDG tanılı çocukların dil profillerini incelemek ve kontrollerle karşılaştırmak amaçlanmıştır. Dil gelişimi ile annenin depresyonu, aile işlevselliği ve çocukların dijital alet kullanım özellikleri arasındaki ilişki de değerlendirilmiştir.Yöntem: Yaşı 24-72 ay arasında olan ve gelişimsel dil gecikmesi olan 88 çocuk olgu grubu olarak ve gelişimsel gecikmesi veya kronik hastalığı olmayan ve diğer polikliniklere başvuran 92 çocuk kontrol grubu olarak çalışmaya alınmıştır. Dil becerilerini ölçmek için Türkçe Erken Dil Gelişim Testi, annelerin depresyon düzeyini ölçmek için Beck Depresyon Ölçeği ve aile işlevselliğini değerlendirmek için McMaster Aile Değerlendirme Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Çocukların dijital alet kullanımına yönelik sorular araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanmıştır.Bulgular: Olgu ve kontrollerin sosyodemografik özellikleri farksızdır. Gruplar alıcı dil ve ifade edici dil becerileri açısından karşılaştırıldığında tüm dil becerileri açısından gruplar arasında anlamlı farklılık saptanmıştır. GDG tanısı olan çocukların annelerinin depresyon düzeyleri sağlıklı kontrollerin annelerinden daha yüksektir ve aile işlevselliğindeki güçlükler daha belirgindir. GDG tanısı olan çocukların dijital alet kullanma süreleri daha fazla ve dijital alet kullanımı esnasında ebeveyn denetimi daha azdır.Sonuç: GDG yaşayan olguların erken müdahalesi çok önemlidir. Tedaviye annelerini dahil etmek, annelerin ruh sağlığını değerlendirmek ve dijital alet kullanımına dair bilgiler vermek GDG tanısı olan çocuklar için önemli olumlu sonuçlara yol açabilir

Gelişimsel dil gecikmesi tanısı olan çocuklarda dil özelliklerinin teknolojik alet kullanmaları, aile işlevselliği, anne depresyonu ile ilişkisi ve sağlıklı kontrollerle karşılaştırılması

Relation of language features with maternal depression, family functioning, and digital technology usage in children with developmental language delay–comparison with healthy controlsObjective: Language and communication are very important in the social, emotional and cognitive development of children. Developmental language delay (DLD) is one of the most frequent developmental problems. This study aims to evaluate and compare language profiles between children diagnosed with DLD and healthy controls. The relation between language development and maternal depression, family functioning, and digital device usage is also evaluated.Method: Eighty-eight children diagnosed with DLD and 92 healthy controls with no developmental delay or chronic diseases attending other policlinics were included in the study. All the children were in the 24-72 months age interval. Test of Early Language Development was used to evaluate language profiles; the Beck Depression Inventory was used to examine maternal depression; and the McMaster Family Assessment Device was used to evaluate family functioning. The researchers prepared a questionnaire to assess the subjects’ digital device usage. Results: The sociodemographic features of the groups were similar. Statistically significant differences were found in all language subscales between groups. Maternal depression level in the DLD group was higher than that of the control group. There were more problems in family functioning in the DLD group than among the controls. Digital technology usage and non-supervised digital technology usage were more than in the control group.Conclusion: Early intervention in DLD is very important. Incorporating mothers in the treatment process, evaluating maternal mental health and informing them about digital technology usage may provide positive results for children diagnosed with DLD

___

  • 1. Aksan D. All aspects of language-mainlines of linguistics, Ankara: TDK Yayinlari, 1998. (Turkish)
  • 2. Jacob P. Embodied cognition, communication and the language faculty. In Coello Y, Bartolo A (editors). Language and action in cognitive neuroscience. First ed. New York: Psychology Press, 2013; 3-29.
  • 3. Marton K, Abramoff B, Rosenzweig S. Social cognition and language in children with specific language impairment (SLI). J Commun Disord 2005; 38:143-162. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Kuhl PK. Is speech learning “gated” by the social brain? Dev Sci 2007; 10:110-120. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Baldwin DA. Understanding the link between joint attention and language. In C. Moore & P. J Dunham (editors). Joint attention: its origins and role in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995, 131-158.
  • 6. Bruner J. Child’s talk: learning to use language. New York: Norton, 1983.
  • 7. Gergely G, Egyed K, Kiraly I. On pedagogy. Dev Sci 2007; 10:139-146. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Carpenter M, Nagell K, Tomasello M, Butterworth G, Moore C. Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 1998; 63:1-174. [CrossRef]
  • 9. McMurray B. Defusing the childhood vocabulary explosion. Science 2007; 317:631. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Boyle J. Speech and language delays in preschool children. BMJ 2011; 343:d5181. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Burden V, Stott CM, Forge J, Goodyer I. The Cambridge Language and Speech Project (CLASP). I. Detection of language difficulties at 36 to 39 months. Dev Med Child Neurol 1996; 38:613-631. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Law J, Garrett Z, Nye C. Speech and language therapy interventions for children with primary speech and language delay or disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 3:CD004110. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Law J, Boyle J, Harris F, Harkness A, Nye C. Screening for speech and language delay: a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2:1-184. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Sundheim ST, Voeller KK. Psychiatric implications of language disorders and learning disabilities: risks and management. J Child Neurol 2004; 19:814-826. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Johnson CJ, Beitchman JH, Young A, Escobar M, Atkinson L, Wilson B, Brownlie EB, Douglas L, Taback N, Lam I, Wang M. Fourteen-year follow-up of children with and without speech/ language impairments: speech/language stability and outcomes. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42:744-760. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Catts HW, Fey ME, Tomblin JB, Zhang X. A longitudinal investigation of reading outcomes in children with language impairments. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002; 45:1142-1157. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Simms MD, Schum RL. Language development and communication disorders. In Kliegman RM, Behrman RE, Jenson HB, Stanton BF (editors). Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. Nineteenth ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2011, chap32. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Strader TJ: Digital technology in the 21st century. In Digital Product Management, Technology and Practice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Edited by Troy JS. Hershey: Business Science Reference, 2011, 235-262. [CrossRef]
  • 19. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On The Horizon, 2001; 9:1-6. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Vandewater EA, Rideout VJ, Wartella EA, Huang X, Lee JH, Shim MS. Digital childhood: electronic media and technology use among infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Pediatrics 2007; 119:1006-1015. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Vandewater EA, Lee SJ. Measuring children’s media use in the digital age: issues and challenges. Am Behav Sci 2009; 52:1152- 1176. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Johnson GM. Young children’s internet use at home and school: patterns and profiles. J Early Child Res 2010; 8:282-293. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Garcia D, Bagner DM, Pruden SM, Nichols-Lopez K. Language Production in Children With and At Risk for Delay: Mediating Role of Parenting Skills. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2015; 44:814-825. [CrossRef]
  • 24. Pan BA, Rowe ML, Singer JD, Snow CE. Maternal correlates of growth in toddler vocabulary production in low-income families. Child Dev 2005; 76:763-782.
  • 25. Gelfand DM, Teti DM. The effects of maternal depression on children. Clin Psychol Rev 1990; 10:329-353. [CrossRef]
  • 26. Stein A, Malmberg LE, Sylva K, Barnes J, Leach P; FCCC team. The influence of maternal depression, care giving, and socioeconomic status in the post-natal year on children’s language development. Child Care Health Dev 2008; 34:603- 612. [CrossRef]
  • 27. Frankenburg WK, Dodds J, Archer P, Shapiro H, Bresnick B. The Denver II: a major revision and restandardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test. Pediatrics 1992; 89:91-97. 28. Anlar B, Yalaz K. Denver II Gelişimsel Tarama Testi. Turk Cocuklarına Uyarlanması ve Standardizasyonu. Hacettepe Cocuk Nörolojisi Gelişimsel Tıp Araştırmaları Grubu, Ankara, 1996.
  • 29. Hresko WP, Reid DK, Hammill DD. Test of Early Language Development (TELD). Third ed. PRO-ED, Austin:Texas, 1999.
  • 30. Topbas S, Guven S. Test of Early Language Development: Turkish (Teld3: T). Turkish Early Language Development Test (TEDIL). Ankara, Detay Publishing, 2011. (Turkish)
  • 31. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4:561-571. [CrossRef]
  • 32. Hisli N. A study on validity of Beck depression Inventory. Turkish Journal of Psychology 1988; 6:118-126. (Turkish)
  • 33. Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS. The McMaster family assessment device. J Marital Fam Ther 1983; 9:171-180. [CrossRef]
  • 34. Bulut I. Family assessment scale manual. Ankara: Ozguzelis Press, 1990. (Turkish)
  • 35. Council on Communications and Media. From the American Academy of Pediatrics: Policy statement-media violence. Pediatrics 2009; 124:1495-1503.
  • 36. Bremer J. The internet and children: advantages and disadvantages. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2005; 14:405- 428. [CrossRef]
  • 37. Subrahmanyam K, Kraut RE, Greenfield PM, Gross EF. The impact of home computer use on children’s activities and development. Future Child 2000; 10:123-144. [CrossRef]
  • 38. Jackson LA, Eye A, Fitzgerald HE, Witt EA, Zhao Y. Internet use, videogame playing and cell phone use as predictors of children’s body mass index (BMI), body weight, academic performance, and social and overall self-esteem. Comput Human Behav 2011; 27:599-604. [CrossRef]
  • 39. Van den Bulck J, Van den Bergh B. The influence of perceived parental guidance patterns on children’s media use: gender differences and media displacement. J Broadcast Electron Media 2000; 44:329-348. [CrossRef]
  • 40. Livingstone S, Helsper EJ. Parental mediation of children’s internet use. J Broadcast Electron Media 2008; 52:581-599. [CrossRef]
  • 41. Zhao S. Parental education and children’s online health information seeking: beyond the digital divide debate. Soc Sci Med 2009; 69:1501-1505. [CrossRef]
  • 42. Yen JY, Yen CF, Chen CC, Chen SH, Ko CH. Family factors of internet addiction and substance use experience in Taiwanese adolescents. Cyberpsychol Behav 2007; 10:323-329. [CrossRef]
  • 43. Brennan PA, Hammen C, Andersen MJ, Bor W, Najman JM, Williams GM. Chronicity, severity, and timing of maternal depressive symptoms: relationships with child outcomes at age 5. Dev Psychol 2000; 36:759-766. [CrossRef]
  • 44. Horwitz S, Irwin JR, Briggs-Gowan MJ, Bosson Heenan JM, Mendoza J, Carter AS. Language delay in a community cohort of young children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2003; 42:932-940. [CrossRef]
  • 45. Murray L, Fiori-Cowley A, Hooper R, Cooper P. The impact of postnatal depression and associated adversity on early motherinfant interactions and later infant outcome. Child Dev 1996; 67:2512-2526. [CrossRef]
  • 46. Delaney EM, Kaiser AP. The effects of teaching parents blended communication and behavior support strategies. Behav Disord 2001; 26:93-116.
  • 47. Glading ST. Family Therapy-History, theory, and practice. Translated by Ibrahim Keklik and Ibrahim Yıldırım, PDR Publishing, 2012.(Turkish)
  • 48. McKenry PC, Price SJ. Families coping with change: a conceptual overview. Families and change. In: Coping with stressful events and transition (Eds.). McKenry PJ and Price SJ Sage Publications, California, 2005, 1-25.
  • 49. Respler-Herman M, Mowder BA, Yasik AE, Shamah R. Parenting beliefs, parental stress, and social support relationships. J Child Fam Stud 2012; 21:190-198. [CrossRef]
  • 50. Azar ST, Weinzierl KM. Child maltreatment and childhood injury research: a cognitive behavioral approach. J Pediatr Psychol 2005; 30:598-614. [CrossRef]
  • 51. Linderkamp F. Komorbidität und elterliche Psychopathologie bei externalisierenden Verhaltensstörungen im Kindesalter. Z Entwicklungspsychol Padagog Psychol 2006; 38:43-52. (German) [CrossRef]
  • 52. Murray L. The impact of postnatal depression on infant development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1992; 33:543-561. [CrossRef]
  • 53. Weems DM, Rogers C. America’s next top model: parent behaviors that promote reading. Child Educ 2007; 84:105-106. [CrossRef]
  • 54. Valcke M, Bonte S, De Wever B, Rots I. Internet parenting styles and the impact on internet use of primary school children. Comput Educ 2010; 55:454-464. [CrossRef]
  • 55. Roberts MY, Kaiser AP. The effectiveness of parent-implemented language interventions: a meta-analysis. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2011; 20:180-199. [CrossRef]
  • 56. Eyberg SM, Nelson MM, Boggs SR. Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with disruptive behavior. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2008; 37:215-237. [CrossRef] 57. Kaminski JW, Valle LA, Filene JH, Boyle CL. A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2008; 36:567-589. [CrossRef]
  • 58. Webster-Stratton C, Reid MJ, Hammond M. Treating children with early-onset conduct problems: intervention outcomes for parent, child, and teacher training. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2004; 33:105-124. [CrossRef]
  • 59. Dunst CJ, Raab M, Trivette CM. Characteristics of naturalistic language intervention strategies. J Speech Lang Pathol Appl Behav Anal 2011; 5:8-16.
  • 60. Lindsay G, Dockrell JE, Strand S. Longitudinal patterns of behaviour problems in children with specific speech and language difficulties: child and contextual factors. Br J Educ Psychol 2007; 77:811-828. [CrossRef]
Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1018-8681
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1984
  • Yayıncı: Kare Yayıncılık