___

• Bendix, Reinhard (1960) Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait, Garden City New York: Doubleday.
• Boddewyn, J. (1961) “Frederick Winslow Taylor Revisited,” Journal of the Academy of Management, (4)2: 100-107.
• Carey, Alex (1967) “The Hawthorne Studies: A Radical Criticism,” American Sociological Review, 32(3): 403-416.
• Delany, William (1963) “The Development and decline of Patrimonial and Bureaucratic Administration,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 7(4): 458- 501.
• Dibble, Vernon K. (1965) “The Organization of Traditional Authority: English County Government, 1558 to 1640,” Handbook of Organizations (Edt. James G. March) Chicago: Rand McNally, 879-909.
• DiMaggio, Paul J. ve Walter W. Powell (1983) “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147-160. Drucker, Peter F. (1954) The Practice of Management, New York: Harper.
• Edwards, Richard (1979) Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century, New York: Basic Books.
• Fayol, Henri (1949) General and Industrial Management, London: Pitman Publishing Company.
• Franke, Richard Herbert ve James D. Kaul (1978) “The Hawthorne Experiments: First Statistical Interpretation,” American Sociological Review, 43(5): 623-643.
• Frost, Carl F., John H. Wakely ve Robert A. Ruh (1974) The Scanlon Plan for Organizational Development: Identity, Participation and Equity, East Lansing: Michigan State University.
• Fry, Louis W. (1976) “The Maligned F. W. Taylor: A Reply to His Many Critics,” The Academy of Management Review, 1(3): 124-129.
• Gilbreth, Frank B. ve Lilian Gilbreth (1917) Applied Motion Study, New York: Sturgis and Walton Co.
• Gouldner, Alvin W. (1954) Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy, Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
• Gulick, Luther ve L. Urwick (1937) Papers on the Science of Administration, New York: Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University.
• Hall, Richard H. (1963) “The Concept of Bureaucracy: An Empirical Assessment,” American Journal of Sociology, 69(1): 32-40
• Lawler, Edward E. III (1971) Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View, New York: McGraw Hill.
• Locke, Edwin A. (1982) “The Ideas of Frederick W. Taylor: An Evaluation,” The Academy of Management Review, (7(1): 14-24.
• --- (1975) “personnel Attitudes and Motivation,” Annual Review of Psychology, 26: 457-480
• Locke, E.A., D.B. Feren, F.M. McCaleb, K.M. Shaw ve A.T. Denny. (1980) “The Relative Effectiveness of Four Methods of Motivating Employee Performance,” Changes in Working Life (Editörler: K. Duncan, M. Gruneberg ve D. Wallis), Chichester, England: Wiley ss. 363-387.
• Massie, Joseph L. (1965) “Management Theory,” Handbook of Organizations, Ed. James G. March, Chicago: Rand McNally, 387-422.
• Michels, Robert (1949) Political Parties, New York: Free Press
• Mooney, James D. (1937) “The Principles of Organization,” Papers on The Science of Administration (Ed. Luther Gulick ve L. Urwick), New York: Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University
• Mooney, James D. ve Allan C. Reiley (1939) The Principles of Organization, New York: Harper.
• Morgan, Gareth (1997) Images of Organization, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc. nd
• Mouzelis, Nicos (1979), Organization and Bureaucracy (2 Edition) London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
• Pugh, D. S., D. J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings ve C. Turner (1968) “Dimensions of Organization Structure,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1): 65-105.
• Rodrigues, Carl A. (2001) “Fayol's 14 Principles of Management Then and Now: A Framework for Managing Today's Organizations Effectively,” Management Decision 39(10): 880-889.
• Ryan, Thomas A. (1947) Work and Effort: The Psychology of Production, New York: Ronald.
• Scott, W. Richard (1998) Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (4th Ed.) New Jersey: Prentice Hall (1992-3 Ed). rd nd
• Simon, Herbert A. (1965) Administrative Behavior, (2 Ed.) New York: Free Press.
• Taylor, Frederick W. (1911) The Principles of Scientific Management, New York: Harper.
• --- (1947) Scientific Management, New York: Harper & Brothers.
• Umstot, D. D., C. H. Bell, T.R. Mitchell, T. R. (1976) “Effects of Job Enrichment and Task Goals on Satisfaction and Productivity: Implications for Job Design,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 61: 379-394
• Udy, Stanley H. Jr. (1959) “Bureaucracy and Rationality in Weber's Organization Theory,” American Sociological Review, 24(6): 791-795.
• Vernon, Horace Middleton (1977), Industrial Fatigue and Efficiency, (Ýlk Baský 1921) New York: Arno Press.
• Walton, Richard E. (1977) “Work Innovation at Topeka: After Six Years,” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 13(3): 422-433.
• Ward, John W. (1964) “The Ideal of Individualism and the Reality of Organization,” Business Establishment (Editör: Earl F. Cheit), New York: John Wiley, ss. 37-76.
• Weber, Max (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, London: Oxford university Press.
• --- (1946) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, Editörler: H.H.Gerth ve C.W. Mills, New York: Oxford University Press
• Wrege, Charles D. ve Amedeo G. Perroni (1974) “Taylor's Pig Tale: A Historical Analysis of Frederick W. Taylor's Pig-Iron Experiments,” The Academy of Management Journal, 17(1): 6-27.
• Wrege, Charles D. ve Anne Maria Stotka (1978) “Coke Creates A Classic: The Story Behind W. F. Taylor's Principles of Scientific Management,” The Academy of Management Review, 3(4): 736-749. nd
• Wren, Daniel A. (1979) The Evolution of Management Thought (2 Ed), New York: Wiley.