Kurum performansının değerlendirilmesinde iç ve dış müşteri memnuniyetinin ölçülmesi ve yönetilmesi

Gittikçe artan rekabet koşulları şirketleri sürekli yenilenmeye, değişim yaratmaya, stratejik hedeflerini çok hassas belirlemeye ve bu hedeflere ulaşmasını sağlayacak uygun altyapıyı kurmaya zorlamaktadır. Her türlü koşul oluşturulduktan sonra ise şirketlerin bunları sürekli takip etmesi, durumunu izlemesi ve ihtiyaç halinde hemen müdahalelerde bulunması gereklidir. Bu noktada performans yönetim sistemlerine ihtiyaç duyulur. Performans yönetim sisteminde yapılar arasındaki ilişkiler doğru tanımlanmalı, hedefler ve gerçekleşen durumlar sürekli analiz edilmelidir. Bu çalışmada, geliştirilen müşteri memnuniyetinin ölçülmesi ve yönetilmesi modeli kapsamında özel bir bankada iki uygulama gerçekleştirilmiş, iç ve dış müşterilerin memnuniyet seviyeleri araştırılmış, çok değişkenli istatistiksel analiz yöntemleri ile memnuniyete etki eden faktörler arası ilişkiler incelenmiştir, iç ve dış müşterilerin kurumdan genel memnuniyet seviyesinin ölçülmesi için çerçeve sunulmuş, ilgili faktörlerin kurum performansı artışı üzerinde etkili olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

Use of appraisal and management of internal and external customer satisfaction in corporate performance assessment

In a modern age, the rapid changing business environment enabled innovation the first imperative of achieving strategic business goals and requires proper advancement of infrastructure. Acquiring aforementioned skill set is necessary but not enough, the firms, with a proactive approach, further need to detect evolving business climate, check and intervene if the current situation requires to do so. In order to maintain and sustain up to date competitiveness Performance Management Systems are needed. The interactions between structures within the Performance Management Systems need to be well-defined, targets and achievements have to be analyzed constantly. In this study, we have conducted two applications in a private bank in the context of customer satisfaction measurement and management model, investigated satisfaction levels of internal and external customers, examined interactions of the factors affecting fulfillment levels of potential customers with multivariate statistical analysis methods and presented the framework for measuring the overall satisfaction level stakeholders and customers, have found out that related factors have positive impact on corporate performance increasement.
Keywords:

-,

___

  • Amaratunga, D. ve Baldry, D. (2002). Moving From Performance Measurement to Performance Management. Facilities,20 (5): 217-223
  • Armstrong, J. S. (1996). Competitor orientation:effects of objectives and information on managerial decisions and profitability. Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (2): 188-199
  • Armstrong, M. (1994). Performance management. London: Clays Ltd
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99-120
  • Conti, T. A. (2007). A history and review of European quality award model. The TQM Magazine, 19 (2): 112-128
  • Coşkun, A. (2006). Büyük sanayi işletmelerinde kurumsal performans ölçüm ve yönetim uygulamaları. Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış, 5 (19): 119-136
  • Denisi, A. S. (2000). Performance apprasial and performance management,a multilevel analysis. K. J. Klein ve S. W. J. Kozlowski (Editörler), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations, İçinde (121-156). San Francisco: Jossey Bass
  • Denison, D. R. ve Mishra, A. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organisational culture and effectiveness. Organisation Science, 6 (2): 204-223
  • Denison D. (2006), Diagnosing organizational cultures: validating a model and method. http://denisonconsulting.com/Libraries/Resources/Denison-2006- Validity.sflb.ashx, (11.10.2009)
  • Fawcett, S. E., Calantone, R. ve Smith, S. R. (1997). Delivery capability and firm performance in international operations. International Journal of Production Economics, 51 (3): 191-204
  • Ghalayini, A. M. ve Noble J. S. (1996). The changing basis of performance measurement. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 16 (8): 63-80
  • Gronroos, C. (1990). Service management and marketing: managing the moments of truth in service competition. USA: Lexington Books
  • Halachmi, A. (2005). Performance measurement is only one way of managing performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54 (7): 502-516
  • Hayes, B. E. (1998), Measuring customer satisfaction. Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press
  • Hirons, E. ve Simon, A. (1998). External customer satisfaction as a performance measure of the management of a research and development department. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 15 (8/9): 969-987
  • Işığıçok, E. (2008). Performans ölçümü, yönetimi ve istatistiksel analizi, http://www.ekonometridernegi.org/bildiriler/o24s3.pdf, (12.10.2008)
  • Irani, Z., Beskese, A. ve Love, P. E. D. (2004). Total quality management and corporate culture: constructs of organisational excellence. Journal of Technovation, 24(8): 643---650
  • Irwin, R. L., D. Zwick ve Sutton, W. A. (1999). Assessing organizational attributes contributing to marketing excellence. European Journal of Marketing, 33 (3/4): 314-328
  • Kıngır, S. ve Taşkıran, E. (2006). Performans değerlendirme çalışmalarına ilişkin işgören görüşlerinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 7 (1): 197-198
  • Letza, S. (1996). Improving the quality of project appraisal and management: an exercise in organizational learning. The Learning Organization, 3 (3): 26-30
  • Likierman, A. (2009). The five traps of performance measurement
  • Harward Business Review, October (101)
  • Lockett, J. (1992). Effective performance management: a strategic guide to getting the best from people. London: Kogan Page
  • Marcoulides, G. A. ve Ronald, H. H. (1993). Organizational culture and performance: proposing and testing a model. Organization Science, 4 (2): 209-225
  • Marshall, M., Wray, L. ve Epstein, P. (1999). 21st century community focus better results by linking citizens, government and performance measurement
  • Public Management, 81 (10): 12---19
  • McAdam, R. ve Bailey, B. (2002). Business performance measures and alignment impact on strategy. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22 (9): 972-996
  • Mondy, R. W. Noe, R. M. ve Premeaux, S. R. (2002). Human resources management. NJ: Prentice Hall
  • Moullin, M. (2007). Performance measurement definitions-linking performance measurement and organisational excellence. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 20 (3): 181-183
  • Najmi, M., Rigas J. ve Fan, I. (2005). A framework to review performance measurement systems. Business Process Management Journal, 11 (2): 109-122
  • Naor, M., Goldstein, S. M., Linderman, K. W. ve Schroeder, R. G. (2008) The role of culture as driver of quality management and performance: infrastructure versus core quality practices. Decision Sciences, 39 (4): 671-702
  • Neely, A., Gregory, M. ve Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design --- a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15 (4): 80-116
  • Newman, K. (2001). Interrogating SERVQUAL: a critical assessment of service quality measurement in a high street retail bank. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 19 (3): 126-139
  • Owen, K., Mundy, R., Guild, W. ve Guild, R. (2001). Creating and sustaining the high performance organization. Managing Service Quality, 11 (1): 10-21
  • Öztürk, Ü. (2008). Organizasyonlarda Performans Yönetimi. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık
  • Palmer, M. (1993). Performans Değerlendirmesi. İstanbul: Rota Yayınları
  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. ve Berry, L. L. (1990). Delivering Quality Service. Toronto: The Free Press
  • Parasuraman, A. (2004). Assessing and improving service performance for maximum impact: insights from a two-decade-long research journey. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 5 (2): 45-52
  • Peters, T. J. ve Waterman, R. H. (1982). In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper and Row
  • Philpott, L. ve Sheppard, L. (1992). Managing for improved performance, strategies for human resource management. London: Kogan Page
  • Podobnik, D. ve Dolinsek, S. (2008). Competitiveness and performance development: an integrated management model. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21 (2): 213-229
  • Robson, I. (2004). From process measurement to performance improvement. Business Process Management Journal, 10 (5): 510-521
  • Sorensen, J. B. (2002). The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 (1): 70-91
  • TSE (2008). TS EN ISO 9001:2008, Kalite Yönetim Sistemleri
  • Uzun, D. (2007). Örgüt kültürünün bilgi yönetim sürecine ve örgütsel performansa etkisi: beş yıldızlı otel işletmelerinde bir uygulama. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Soyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir
  • Wiele, T. V. D. Boselie, P. ve Hesselink, M. (2002). Empirical evidence for the relationship between customer satisfaction and business performance
  • Managing Service Quality, 12 (3): 184-193
  • Wilkinson, A. (2001). In search of quality, the quality management experience. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 18 (8): 813-835
  • Wongrassamee, S., Simmons, J. E. L. ve Gardiner, P. D. (2003)
  • Performance measurement tools: the balanced scorecard and the efqm excellence model. Measuring Business Excellence, 7 (1): 14-29
  • About EFQM, www.efqm.org/en/tabid/108/default.aspx, (03.09.2010)
  • The Performance Culture Checklist, www.idea.gov.uk/idk/aio/631672, (07.11.2009)
  • Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence, http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/publications/criteria.cfm, (25.08.2010)
  • 20011-2012 Performance Criteria for Excellence, http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/publications/upload/2011_2012_Business_Nonprofit_ Criteria.pdf, (25.08.2012).