Kaynak Tabanlı İşletme Yetenekleri Ölçeği Geliştirilmesi ve Doğrulanması

Kaynak Tabanlı Görüş (KTG) işletme yeteneklerini, rekabet avantajı yaratmak için stratejik seviyede önemli ve firmaların faaliyetlerini etkin olarak koordine etmelerine imkan sağlayan beceri ve bilgi demeti olarak tanımlanmaktadır. KTG teorisinin takipçisi araştırmacılar tarafından, işletme yeteneklerinin performans ve rekabet avantajıyla olan ilişkileri birçok kez test edilmiş ancak birbirlerinden farklı sonuçlar elde edilmiştir. Bunun nedenlerinden birisi işletme yeteneklerine ait geçerliliği ve güvenilirliği ispatlanmış bir araştırma ölçeğinin bulunmayışıdır. Bu konudaki çalışmalara katkı sağlamak amacıyla geliştirilen işletme yetenekleri ölçeğinin geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği 379 işletme yöneticisinden toplanan veriler kullanılarak doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile test edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak yedi boyutlu bir işletme yetenekleri ölçeği elde edilmiştir.

Resource base view (RBV) defines capabilities as collective skills, abilities, and expertise of a firm that plays strategically crucial role to acquire competitive advantage. Researchers that pursue RBV, many times tested the effects of business capabilities on performance and competitive advantage. But the findings have been diverse because of the lack of a valid and reliable measurement instrument. Thus, a measurement instrument has been developed to fulfill this gap. Data collected from 379 executives have been analyzed to test the validity and reliability using confirmatory factor analyzing. Consequently, a measurement instrument with seven dimensions of business capabilities has been obtained.

___

  • Amit, R ve Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1993). Strategic Assets and Organizational Rents. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33-46.
  • Bagozzi, R.P. (1981) An examination of the validity of two models of article. Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol.18, pp.21-37
  • Bagozzi, R.P. ve Phillips, L.W. (1982). Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construct. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 459-489.
  • Bagozzi, R.P. ve Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74 – 94.
  • Barney, J. (1986). Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231-1241.
  • Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99 -120.
  • Barney, J.B. (1995). Looking Inside For Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 9 (4), 49–61.
  • Barney, J.B. ve Zajac, E.J. (1994). Competitive Organizational Behavior: Toward an Organizationally-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 5–9.
  • Bentler, P.M. (1990). On the Equivalence of Factors and Components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25 (1), 67-74.
  • Bentler, P.M. ve Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significant Test Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
  • Birchall, D.W. ve Tovstiga, G. (1999). The Strategic Potential of a Firm’s Knowledge Portfolio. Journal of General Management, 25, 1–16.
  • Byrne, B.N. (2001) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. Mahwah, NJ., Lawrence Erbaum Associates
  • Celuch, K.G., Kasouf, C.J. ve Peruvemba, V. (2002). The Effects of Perceived Market and Learning Orientation on Assessed Organizational Capabilities. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 545-554.
  • Chandler, A.D. (1990). Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.
  • Chau, P.Y.K. (1997). Reexamining a Model for Evaluating Information Center Success Using aStructural Equation Modeling Approach. Decision Science, 28, 309-334.
  • Churchill, G. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73.
  • Day, G.S. (1994). The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58 (October), 37 – 52.
  • Deming, W.E. (1998). Krizden Çıkış (Çev.: Akaş, C.). İstanbul: KalDer Yayınları.
  • DeSarbo, S.W., DiBenedetto, C.A., Jedidi, K. ve Song, K. (2006). Identifying Sources of Heterogenity for Emprically Deriving Strategic Types: A Constrained Finite-Mixture Structural-Equation Methodology. Management Science, 52(6), 909-924.
  • Dierickx, I. ve Cool, K. (1989). Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504-1511.
  • Droge, C., Vickery, S. ve Markland, R.E. (1994). Sources and Outcomes of Competitive Advantage: An Exploratory Study In The Furniture Industry. Decision Sciences, Vol. (5/6), 669 – 689.
  • Drucker, P.F. (2000). 21. Yüzyıl İçin Yönetim Tartışmaları, (Çev. Bahçıvangil, İ ve Gorbon, G.). İstanbul: Epsilon Yayıncılık
  • Drucker, P.F. (2003). Geleceğin Toplumunda Yönetim, (Çev. Zaman, M.). İstanbul: Hayat Yayıncılık.
  • Eisenhardt, K.M. ve Martin, J.A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21, (10-11) (special edition), 1105-1121.
  • Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D.D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39 – 50.
  • Grant, R.M. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.
  • Hair, J.F, Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. ve Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 5th ed.
  • Hall, R. (1993). A Framework Linking Intangible Resources and Capabilities to Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14(8), 607 -618.
  • Helfat, C.E. ve Peteraf, M.A. (2003). The Dynamic Resource-Based View: Capability Lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 997–1010.
  • Henderson, R. and Cockburn, I. (1994) Measuring competence: Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.15, No.8 (Winter), Pp. 63–84.
  • Hiroyuki O. (2003). Transaction Costs and Capabilities as Determinants of the R&D Boundaries of the Firm: A Case study of the Ten Largest Pharmaceutical Firms in Japan. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 187-211.
  • Hitt, M.A. ve Ireland, R.D. (1986). Relationships among Corporate Level Distinctive Competencies, Diversification Strategy, Corporate Structure and Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 23 (July), 401 - 416.
  • Huselid, M.A. (1995). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity and Corporate Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635 – 72.
  • Huselid, M., Jackson, S.E. ve Schuler, R.S. (1997). Technical and Strategic Human Resource Management Effectiveness as Determinants of Firm Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 171 – 88.
  • Kotter, J.P. (1997). Kültürler ve Koalisyonlar. Gibson, R. (Der.), Geleceği Yeniden Düşünmek, ss.147-158. İstanbul: Sabah Yayınları.
  • Liedtka, J.M. (1996). Collaborating Across Lines of Business for Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 10, 20–37.
  • Marino, K. (1996). Developing Consensus on Firm Competencies and Capabilities. Academy of Management Executive, 10, 40–51.
  • Marsh, H.W. ve Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis to the Study of Self-Concept: First and Higher Order Factor Structures and Their Invariance Across Groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562-582.
  • Moore G.A. (2000) Living on The Fault Line: Managing Shareholder Value in The Age of the Internet. Harper Business. New York
  • Morrow, M. and Wurtz, W. (2000) Measuring the impact resulting from implementing an organizational capability plan. Organization Development Journal, Vol. 18, issue 1(Spring), pp. 65-74
  • Nelson, R.R. ve Winter, S.G. (2002). Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2), 23–46.
  • Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill. Penrose, E.G. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: Wiley.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive Advantage Through People: Unleashing the Power of the Work Force. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive Strategies: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press.
  • Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage-Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.
  • Porter, M.E. (1996). What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61-78.
  • Porter, M.E. (2001). Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 62-78.
  • Prahalad, C.K. ve Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
  • Price, J.L. ve Mueller, C.W. (1986). Handbook of Organizational Measurement. Marshfield MA: Pitman.
  • Rao, S.S., Solis, L.E. ve Raghunathan, T.S. (1999). A Framework for International Quality Management Research: Development and Validation of a Measurement Instrument. Total Quality Management, 10(7), 1047-1075.
  • Rumelt, R.P. (1984). Toward a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management (Ed. R.B. Land), Prentice-Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper. NY.
  • Snow, C.C. ve Hrebiniak, L.G. (1980). Strategy, Distinctive Competence and Organizational Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 317-336.
  • Stalk, G., Evans, P. ve Shulman, L.E. (1992). Competing on Capabilities: The New Rules of Corporate Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 70(March/April), 57 - 69.
  • Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. ve Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
  • Ulrich, D. ve Lake, D.G. (1990) Organizational Capability: Competing from the Inside Out. New York, NY: John Willey & Sons Inc.
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
  • Werts, C.E., Linn, R.L. ve Jorseskog, K.G. (1974). Interclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 25-33.