TÜRKİYE'NİN İHRACAT TALEBİ FONKSİYONUNUN SINIR TESTİ YÖNTEMİ İLE EŞBÜTÜNLEŞME ANALİZİ

Bu çalışma, Türkiye'nin 1970'den 2002 yılına kadar kadar olan 32 yıllık dönemini kapsayan yıllık verileri kullanarak yapılan ihracat talebinin ekonometrik analizini içermektedir. Çalışmada, ihracat talebi ile ihracat talebini belirleyen etkenler olan gelir ve nispi fiyatlar arasındaki uzun dönemli ilişkiyi incelemek amacıyla Pesaran, ve öte. 2001 'in sınır testi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu ampirik analizin sonucunda, ihracatla, gelir ve nispi fiyatların eşbütünleşik oldukları görülmüştür. İhracat talebinin, gelir ve nispi fiyatlara göre tahmin edilen uzun dönem esneklikleri sırayla; 0.21 ve - 1.684 olarak bulunmuştur. İthalat ve ihracat fiyat esnekliklerinin toplamı birden büyüktür. -1.01 Marshall-Lerner koşulu sağlanmaktadır. Bu sonuçlar; parasal, mali ve döviz kuru politikalarının halen mevcut olan aleyhteki ticaret dengesinin düzeltilmesinde yardımcı araçlar olarak kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir.

THE COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS OF TURKEY'S EXPORT DEMAND FUNCTION BY BOUNDS TEST

This study includes an econometric analysis ofthe export demand behaviour by using Turkey's annual data that cover 32 years periodsfrom 1970 to 2002. in the study, the •bounds test' method of Pesaran et al 2001 was used to investigate the long run relationship between export demand, and its determinants, namely income and relative prices. As a result of this empirical analysis, it was demonstrated that export volume, income and relative prices were cointegrated. The estimated long term elasticities of export demand with respect to income and relative prices are 0.21 and -1.684, respectively The sum ofthe elasticities of import and export demand exceeds one -1.01 i.e, Marshall-Lerner condition holds. These results show that monetary, flscal and exchange rate policies may be used as substitutive policies to correct unfavourable trade balance

___

  • BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M. (1986). Determinants of international trade flows: the case of developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 20, 107-23.ss.
  • BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M. (1998). Cointegration approach to estimate the longrun trade elasticities in LDCs, InternationalEconomic Journal. 12 (3), 89-96.ss.
  • BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M. ve NIROOMAND, F. (1998). Long-run price elasticities and the Marshall-Lerner condition revisited. Economics Letters, 61, 101-9.SS.
  • BARDSEN, G. (1989). Estimation of long run coeffıcient in error correction models. OxfordBulletin of Economics and Statistics, 51, 345-350.ss.
  • BOYD, D., CAPORALE, G.M. ve D SMITH, R. (2001). Real exchange rate effects on the balance of trade: cointegration and the Marshall-Lerner condition. International Journal ofFinance and Economics, 6, 187-200.SS.
  • COŞAR, E.E. (2002). Price and income elasticities of Turkish export demand: a panel data application. Central Bank Review, 2, 19-53.ss.
  • DİE. (2003). İstatistik Göstergeler, (1923-2002).
  • DPT. (2004). Ekonomik ve Sosyal Göstergeler, (1950-2003).
  • ENGLE, R.F. ve GRANGER, C.VJ. (1987). Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing, Econometrica. 55, 251-76.ss. IMF(2002). Financial Statistical Yearbook.
  • JOHANSEN, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(1), 231-54.SS.
  • JOHANSEN, S. ve JUSELIUS, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210.SS.
  • KHAN, M. (1974). Import and export demand in developing countries. IMF Staff Papers, 21, 678-693.ss.
  • KREININ, E.M. (1967). Price elasticities in international tradet. Review of Economics and Statistics, 49, 510-16.ss.
  • KREMERS, J.J.M., ERICSSON, N.L. ve DOLADO, J. (1992). The power of cointegration tests. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54, pp. 325-348.
  • MAH, J.S. (2000). An empirical examination of the disaggregated import demand of Korea - the case of information technology products. Journal of Asian Economics, Yol.ll,237-244.ss.
  • MAROUEZ, J. ve MCNEILLY, C. (1988). Income and price elasticities for exports of developing countries. Review ofEconomics andStatistics, 70, 306-14.ss.
  • MARQUEZ, J. (1990). Bilateral trade elasticities, Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 70-77.ss.
  • OSTRAY, J. ve ROSE, A. (1992). An empirical evaluation of the macroeconomic effects of tariffs. Journal of International Money andFinace, 11, 63-79.SS.
  • PANAGARIYA, A. SHAH, S. ve MISHRA, D. (1996). Demand elasticities in intemational tradet: Are they really low?. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. 1712.
  • PESARAN, H., SHIN, Y. ve SMITH, RJ. (2001). Bound testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. University ofCambridge, Revised-DAE Working Paper No. 9907. rhttp://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/facultv/pesaran/psslrl.pdf)
  • REINHART, C. (1995). Devaluations, relative prices, and intemetional trade. IMF StaffPapers, 42, 290-312. ss.
  • RINCON, H.C. (1998). Testing the short-and-long-run exchange rate effects on trade balance:the case of Columbia, http://www.banrep.gov.co/ docum/ftp /borral20.pdf
  • ROSE, A. (1990). Exchange rates and the trade balance: some evidence from developing countries. Economic Letters, 34, 271-75. ss.
  • . (1991). Role of exchange rates in a popular model of intemetional trade: does the 'Marshall-Lerner' condition hold?. Journal of International Economics, 30, 301-16. ss.
  • SENDHADJI, A.S. ve MONTENEGRO, C.E. (1998). Time series analysis of export demand equation : a cross-country analysis. IMF Working Papers, 98/149.
  • . (1999). Time series analysis of export demand equat10n: a cross-country analyS1S. IMFStaf Papers, 46(3), 259-273. SS.
  • ŞİMŞEK, M. ve KADILAR, C. (2004). Türkiye'nin İthalat Talebi Fonksiyonunun Smrr Testi Yaklaşımı ile Eşbütünleşme Analizi : 1970-2002. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 5 (1) 35-42. ss.
  • WARNER, D. ve KREINıN, E.M. (1983). Determinants of intemational trade flows. Review ofEconomics and Statistics, 65, 96-104. ss. WORLD BAKKDatabase.