TÜRKİYE'NİN İHRACAT TALEBİ FONKSİYONUNUN SINIR TESTİ YÖNTEMİ İLE EŞBÜTÜNLEŞME ANALİZİ
Bu çalışma, Türkiye'nin 1970'den 2002 yılına kadar kadar olan 32 yıllık dönemini kapsayan yıllık verileri kullanarak yapılan ihracat talebinin ekonometrik analizini içermektedir. Çalışmada, ihracat talebi ile ihracat talebini belirleyen etkenler olan gelir ve nispi fiyatlar arasındaki uzun dönemli ilişkiyi incelemek amacıyla Pesaran, ve öte. 2001 'in sınır testi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu ampirik analizin sonucunda, ihracatla, gelir ve nispi fiyatların eşbütünleşik oldukları görülmüştür. İhracat talebinin, gelir ve nispi fiyatlara göre tahmin edilen uzun dönem esneklikleri sırayla; 0.21 ve - 1.684 olarak bulunmuştur. İthalat ve ihracat fiyat esnekliklerinin toplamı birden büyüktür. -1.01 Marshall-Lerner koşulu sağlanmaktadır. Bu sonuçlar; parasal, mali ve döviz kuru politikalarının halen mevcut olan aleyhteki ticaret dengesinin düzeltilmesinde yardımcı araçlar olarak kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir.
THE COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS OF TURKEY'S EXPORT DEMAND FUNCTION BY BOUNDS TEST
This study includes an econometric analysis ofthe export demand behaviour by using Turkey's annual data that cover 32 years periodsfrom 1970 to 2002. in the study, the •bounds test' method of Pesaran et al 2001 was used to investigate the long run relationship between export demand, and its determinants, namely income and relative prices. As a result of this empirical analysis, it was demonstrated that export volume, income and relative prices were cointegrated. The estimated long term elasticities of export demand with respect to income and relative prices are 0.21 and -1.684, respectively The sum ofthe elasticities of import and export demand exceeds one -1.01 i.e, Marshall-Lerner condition holds. These results show that monetary, flscal and exchange rate policies may be used as substitutive policies to correct unfavourable trade balance
___
- BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M. (1986). Determinants of international trade flows: the
case of developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 20, 107-23.ss.
- BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M. (1998). Cointegration approach to estimate the longrun trade elasticities in LDCs, InternationalEconomic Journal. 12 (3), 89-96.ss.
- BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M. ve NIROOMAND, F. (1998). Long-run price
elasticities and the Marshall-Lerner condition revisited. Economics Letters, 61,
101-9.SS.
- BARDSEN, G. (1989). Estimation of long run coeffıcient in error correction
models. OxfordBulletin of Economics and Statistics, 51, 345-350.ss.
- BOYD, D., CAPORALE, G.M. ve D SMITH, R. (2001). Real exchange rate effects
on the balance of trade: cointegration and the Marshall-Lerner condition.
International Journal ofFinance and Economics, 6, 187-200.SS.
- COŞAR, E.E. (2002). Price and income elasticities of Turkish export demand: a
panel data application. Central Bank Review, 2, 19-53.ss.
- DİE. (2003). İstatistik Göstergeler, (1923-2002).
- DPT. (2004). Ekonomik ve Sosyal Göstergeler, (1950-2003).
- ENGLE, R.F. ve GRANGER, C.VJ. (1987). Cointegration and Error Correction:
Representation, Estimation, and Testing, Econometrica. 55, 251-76.ss.
IMF(2002). Financial Statistical Yearbook.
- JOHANSEN, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of
Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(1), 231-54.SS.
- JOHANSEN, S. ve JUSELIUS, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and
inference on cointegration with application to the demand for money. Oxford
Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210.SS.
- KHAN, M. (1974). Import and export demand in developing countries. IMF Staff
Papers, 21, 678-693.ss.
- KREININ, E.M. (1967). Price elasticities in international tradet. Review of
Economics and Statistics, 49, 510-16.ss.
- KREMERS, J.J.M., ERICSSON, N.L. ve DOLADO, J. (1992). The power of
cointegration tests. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54, pp. 325-348.
- MAH, J.S. (2000). An empirical examination of the disaggregated import demand of
Korea - the case of information technology products. Journal of Asian
Economics, Yol.ll,237-244.ss.
- MAROUEZ, J. ve MCNEILLY, C. (1988). Income and price elasticities for exports
of developing countries. Review ofEconomics andStatistics, 70, 306-14.ss.
- MARQUEZ, J. (1990). Bilateral trade elasticities, Review of Economics and
Statistics, 72, 70-77.ss.
- OSTRAY, J. ve ROSE, A. (1992). An empirical evaluation of the macroeconomic
effects of tariffs. Journal of International Money andFinace, 11, 63-79.SS.
- PANAGARIYA, A. SHAH, S. ve MISHRA, D. (1996). Demand elasticities in
intemational tradet: Are they really low?. The World Bank Policy Research
Working Paper. 1712.
- PESARAN, H., SHIN, Y. ve SMITH, RJ. (2001). Bound testing approaches to the
analysis of level relationships. University ofCambridge, Revised-DAE Working
Paper No. 9907. rhttp://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/facultv/pesaran/psslrl.pdf)
- REINHART, C. (1995). Devaluations, relative prices, and intemetional trade. IMF
StaffPapers, 42, 290-312. ss.
- RINCON, H.C. (1998). Testing the short-and-long-run exchange rate effects on
trade balance:the case of Columbia, http://www.banrep.gov.co/ docum/ftp
/borral20.pdf
- ROSE, A. (1990). Exchange rates and the trade balance: some evidence from
developing countries. Economic Letters, 34, 271-75. ss.
- . (1991). Role of exchange rates in a popular model of intemetional trade:
does the 'Marshall-Lerner' condition hold?. Journal of International Economics,
30, 301-16. ss.
- SENDHADJI, A.S. ve MONTENEGRO, C.E. (1998). Time series analysis of export
demand equation : a cross-country analysis. IMF Working Papers, 98/149.
- . (1999). Time series analysis of export
demand equat10n: a cross-country analyS1S. IMFStaf Papers, 46(3), 259-273. SS.
- ŞİMŞEK, M. ve KADILAR, C. (2004). Türkiye'nin İthalat Talebi Fonksiyonunun
Smrr Testi Yaklaşımı ile Eşbütünleşme Analizi : 1970-2002. Doğuş Üniversitesi
Dergisi, 5 (1) 35-42. ss.
- WARNER, D. ve KREINıN, E.M. (1983). Determinants of intemational trade
flows. Review ofEconomics and Statistics, 65, 96-104. ss.
WORLD BAKKDatabase.