MALİYET LİDERLİĞİ STRATEJİSİ, TOPLAM KALİTE YÖNETİMİ UYGULAMALARI VE FİNANSAL PERFORMANS İLİŞKİSİ

İşletmeler rekabetin üstesinden gelebilmek için bazı rekabet stratejileri ve toplam kalite yönetimi prensiplerini uygulama gereği duyarlar. Bu çalışmanın amacı maliyet liderliği stratejisi, toplam kalite yönetimi uygulamaları ve finansal perfromans arasındaki ilişkiyi literatür çalışması ve ampirik analizle göstermektir. 142 büyük işletmenin 449 yöneticisine anket uygulandı. Toplanan bilgi AMOS ile değerlendirildi. Sonuç olarak, maliyet liderliği stratejisi, toplam kalite yönetimi uygulamaları ve finansal performans arasındaki ilişki ortaya kondu. Bununla birlikte TKY uygulamaları ve finansal performans arasındaki ilişki de değerlendirildi

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COST LEADERSHIP STRATEGY, TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

Firms need to implement some competition strategies and total quality management applications to overcome the fierce competition among others. The purpose of this study is to show the relationship between cost leadership strategy, total quality management applications and firms’ financial performance with literature review and empirical analysis. 449 questionnaires were conducted to the managers of 142 big firms. The data gathered was assessed with AMOS. As a result, the relationship between cost leadership strategy, total quality management applications and firms’ financial performance has been gathered. In addition, the relationship between TQM applications and financial performance has also been gathered.

___

  • Acar, A. Z., & Zehir, C. (2010). The Harmonized Effects of Generic Strategies and Business Capabilities on Business Performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(4), 689-711.
  • Bal, Y. (2011). The effect of competitive strategies on human resource management practices (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  • Barney, J. & Hesterly, W. S. (2011). Strategic management and competitive advantage: concepts (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Bagozzi, Richard P., Youjae Yi, & Lynn W. P. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative science quarterly, 36, 421-458.
  • Bagozzi, Richard P., & Youjae Yi. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 74-94.
  • Cavusgil, S. T., Knight, G., & Riesenberger, J. R., (2008). International business: Strategy, management and the new realities (1st ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Chong, V. K., Rundus, M. J., (2004). Total quality management, market competition and organizational performance. The British Accounting Review, 36, 155–172.
  • Crocker, L., & J. Algina. (1986). Introduction to classical & modern test theory (1st ed.). Holt, Reinhart & Winston, Orlando.
  • Cua, K. O., Mc Kone, K. E., & Schoreder, R. G. (2001). Relationship between implementation of TQM, JIT and TPM and manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management, 19, 675–694.
  • Daft, R. L. (1983). Learning the craft of organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 8(4), 539-546
  • Day, G. S., & Wensley, R. (1988). Assessing advantage: A framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. Journal of Management, 52, 1-20.
  • Dow, D., Samson, D., & Ford, S. (1999). Exploding the myth: Do all quality management practices contribute to superior quality performance? Production and Operations Management, 8, 1-25.
  • Eraslan, İ. H. (2008). The effects of competitive strategies on firm performance: A study in Turkish textile and apparel industry considering the mediating role of value chain activities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Boğaziçi University Social Sciences Institute, İstanbul.
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd Ed.). London: Sage Fuentes, M. M. F., Saez, A. C. A. & Montes, F. J. L. (2004). The impact of environmental characteristics on TQM principles and organizational performance. Omega, 32 (6), 425– 442.
  • Garson, D. (2012). Testing statistical assumptions, USA: Statistical associates publishing, Retrieved from http://www.statisticalassociates.com/assumptions.pdf Ghemewat, P. & Rivkin, J. W. (2006). Creating competitive advantage. Harvard Business School Background Note, 798-062.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7thed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  • Hoffman, N. P. (2000). An examination of the sustainable competitive advantage concept: Past, present, and future. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 4, 1-21 Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6 (1), 53-60.
  • Hox, J. J., & T. M. Bechger, (1998). An introduction to structural equation modelling. Family Science Review, 11, 354-373.
  • Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Kannan, V. R. & Tan, K. C. (2005). Just in time, total quality management, and supply chain management: understanding their linkages and impact on business performance. Omega 33(2), 153–162.
  • Kaynak H. (2003). The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects of firm performance, Journal of Operations Management, 21(4), 405-435.
  • Kehoe, D. F. (1996). The fundamentals of quality management, Netherlands, Springer.
  • McKiernan, P., (1997). Strategy past; strategy futures. Long Range Planning, 30(5), 790-798.
  • Mintzberg, H. (1988). Generic strategies: Toward a comprehensive framework. Advances in Strategic Management 5, 1-67.
  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press.
  • Porter, M. E. (1990). New global strategies for competitive advantage. Planning Rewiev, 18(3), 4-14
  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive advantage creating and sustaining superior performance.
  • New York: The Free Press. Powel, T. C. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 15-37.
  • Prajogo, D. I. & Sohal, A. S., (2004). The multidimensionality of TQM practices in determining quality and innovation performance-an empirical examination. Technovation, 24, 443–453.
  • Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731.
  • Rahman, S. & Bullock, P. (2005). Soft TQM, hard TQM, and organizational performance relationships: An empirical investigation. Omega 33, 73-83.
  • Rugman, A. & Hodgetts, R., (2000). International business: A strategic management approach (2nd ed.). New York and London: Prentice Hall
  • Sadıkoğlu, E. & Zehir, C. (2010). Investigating the effects of innovation and employee performance on the relationship between total quality management practices and firm performance: An empirical study of Turkish firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 127, 13-26.
  • Saraph, J. V., Benson, P. G., & Schroeder, R. G. (1989). An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management. Decision Sciences, 20, 810–829.
  • Teece, D. C., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A., (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
  • Thompson, A. A., & Strickland, A. J. (1996). Strategic management: Concepts and cases. (9th ed.). USA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
  • Ünlücan, D. (2004). Competitive strategies in small and medium-sized businesses: A research on developing competitive strategies for small and medium-sized businesses in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus while preparing for the European Union, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, Adana.
  • Wheelen, T. L., & Hunger, D. J. (2002). Strategic management and business policy (8th ed.). Massachusetts: Prentice Hall.
  • Zehir, C., & Sadıkoğlu, E. (2012). Relationships among total quality management practices: An empirical study in Turkish industry, International Journal of Performability Engineering, 8, 667-678.
Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-6739
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2000
  • Yayıncı: Doğuş Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

LİSANSLI SPOR ÜRÜNLERİNİN ALGILANAN DEĞER BİLEŞENLERİNİN SATIN ALMA NİYETİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ: TÜRKİYE'NİN EN BÜYÜK ÜÇ FUTBOL KULÜBÜNÜN İNCELENMESİ

İpek KAZANÇOĞLU, MİRAY BAYBARS

TÜRKİYE'YE GELEN YABANCI TURİSTLERİN GELİR DÜZEYİ KÜMELERİNİN YILLARA GÖRE DEĞİŞİMİ

Nurzen ÜZÜMCÜ

PAZAR YÖNELİMİ VE FİRMA PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİ: FARKLILAŞTIRMA STRATEJİSİNİN ARACI ROLÜ

HALİT KESKİN, Songül ZEHİR, HAYAT AYAR ŞENTÜRK

İNSAN KAYNAKLARI YÖNETİM SÜREÇLERİNİN PERFORMANSA ETKİSİ: ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENMENİN ARACILIK ROLÜ VE BİR UYGULAMA

Semih SORAN, Emin SERİN, Mehmet Onur BALKAN

ÇALIŞMA SERMAYE YÖNETİMİNİN FİRMA KÂRLILIĞI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

RIDVAN KESKİN, Füsun GÖKALP

FAALİYET TABANLI MALİYET SİSTEMİ İLE DOĞRU MALİYETLENDİRME ARAÇLARI: OTOMOTİV SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR UYGULAMA

Aynur GÜRSOY, Orçun YÖNTEM, FATMA SERAB ONURSAL

ALTIN FİYATLARININ YAPAY SİNİR AĞLARI İLE TAHMİNİ VE BİR UYGULAMA

RIDVAN YÜKSEL, SONER AKKOÇ

MALİYET LİDERLİĞİ STRATEJİSİ, TOPLAM KALİTE YÖNETİMİ UYGULAMALARI VE FİNANSAL PERFORMANS İLİŞKİSİ

ALİ KURT, CEMAL ZEHİR

TÜRKİYE’YE GELEN YABANCI TURİSTLERİN GELİR DÜZEYİ KÜMELERİNİN YILLARA GÖRE DEĞİŞİMİ

Nurzen ÜZÜMCÜ

LİSANSLI SPOR ÜRÜNLERİNİN ALGILANAN DEĞER BİLEŞENLERİNİN SATIN ALMA NİYETİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ: TÜRKİYE’NİN EN BÜYÜK ÜÇ FUTBOL KULÜBÜNÜN İNCELENMESİ

İpek KAZANÇOĞLU, Miray BAYBARS