BİRCAN ALAN, Murat KAPAN, SADULLAH GİRGİN

Üçüncü Basamak Bir Üniversite Hastanesinde Yapılan 5100 Mammografi Görüntülemesinin Retrospektif Analizi

Amaç: Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi ve Diyarbakır Kadın Doğum ve Çocuk hastanesinde 2010 ile 2015 yılları arasında mamografi çekilmiş, 5100 hastanın mammografik bulgularının literatür eşliğinde retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştırYöntemler: 5400 mammografi olgusu retrospektif olarak incelendi. 300 olgunun rapor ve yaş verileri eksik olduğundan çalışma dışı bırakılarak, çalışmaya 5100 mamografi olguları dahil edildi. Her olgunun yaşı, mammografi bulguları değerlendirildi. Meme görüntüleme sonuçları BIRADS (Breast imaging reporting and data system) sınıflamasına göre kategorize edildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen 5100 hastada ortalama yaş 51,02 yıl idi. Hem sağ hem sol memede lezyon lokalizasyonu en fazla üst dış kadranda (sağ memede %62,9, sol memede %58,3). BIRADS 4 ve BIRADS 5 lezyonlar değerlendirildiğinde her iki memede eşit oranda olduğu ve lezyonun ağırlıklı olarak üst dış kadranda yerleştiği gözlendi. Yaş gruplarına göre BIRADS skorunu karşılaştırdığımızda; 35yaş üzerinde, 35 yaş altındakilere göre BIRADS 4 ve BIRADS 5 lezyon sıklığının istatistiksel olarak daha fazla olduğu (p

Retrospective Analysis of 5100 Mammography Imaging in a Tertiary University Hospital

Objective: In this study, our aim is to retrospectively evaluate, in the light of literature, mammographic findings of 5100 patients whose mammography imaging was performed from 2010 to 2015 in the Medical Faculty, Dicle University, and Children's and Obstetrics Hospital, Diyarbakır. Methods: We retrospectively examined 5400 mammograms. Since the report and age data regarding 300 cases were missing, they were excluded from the study, and hence 5100 cases were included into the study. Each patient's age, mammography findings were evaluated. Breast imaging results were categorized according to BIRADS (Breast imaging reporting and data system) classification. Results: The mean age of 5100 patients included into the study was 51.0 years. The localization of the lesion was detected most in the upper outer quadrant in both right and left breasts (62.9% in the right breast, 58.3% in the left breast). When BIRADS 4 and 5 lesions were assessed, they all were observed to be at equal rate in both breasts, and the lesions were mainly located in the upper outer quadrant. When BIRADS scores were compared according to age groups, the incidence of BIRADS 4 and BIRADS 5 lesions was determined to be higher in >35 years of age than under 35 years of age, which was statistically significant (p <0.001), whereas BIRADS 3 lesions were found more in those patients under 35 years of age.Conclusion: When mammographic imaging results of patients coming from Diyarbakir and the surrounding area were evaluated, it was determined that BIRADS 4 and 5 lesions showed increase in those cases > 35 years of age, and that they were most frequently located in the upper outer quadrant.

PDF

___

1. Fırat D, Hayran M. Cancer statistics in Turkey and in the world, 1990-92;63.
2. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Latest World Cancer Statistics. Press Release No 223. Lyon/ Geneva 2013 The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Latest world cancer statistics Global cancer burden rises to 14.1 million new cases in 2012: Marked increase in breast cancers must be addressed ; Lyon/Geneva :12 December 2013
3. CIA - The World Factbook (2014), https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/appendix/appendixb.html#D. Accessed 5 Feb 2014
4. Wubker A. Explaining variations in breast cancer screening across European countries. Eur J Health Econ HEPAC Health Econ Prev Care, 2013
5. Helvie MA, Chang JT, Hendrick RE, et al. Reduction in latestage breast cancer incidence in the mammography era: implications for overdiagnosis of invasive cancer. Cancer 2014;120:2649-2656.
6. Evans WP. Breast masses. Radiol Clin North Am 1995;33:1085-1108.
7. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2013-2014. American Cancer Society, Inc. 2013.
8. Ozmen V, Anderson BO. The challenge of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries--implementing the breast health global initiative guidelines. US Oncology 2008:76-79.
9. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010;127:2893-2917.
10. Özmen V. Breast cancer screening: current controversies. J Breast Health 2011:7:1.
11. Gülsün M, Demirkazık FB, Köksal A, et al. Meme mikrokalsifikasyonlarının BIRADS kriterlerine göre değerlendirilmesi ve yorumcular arası uyum. Tanısal Gir Rad 2002:8:358-363.
12. Topuz E, Breast Cancer Biology Diagnosis, Staging, Treatment İstanbul Üniversitesi Onkoloji Ensititüsi yayınları 1997;2:12-17.
13. Menteş Ö, Öztürk E, Uğurel, et al. Palpe edilemeyen meme lezyonlarında kanser riskini belirlemede BIRADS kategorizasyonu, yaş ve öykünün önemi. J Breast Health 2008:4:151-156.
14. Taif S, Tufail F, Alnuaimi AS. Mammography performance in Oman: Review of factors influencing cancer yield and positive predictive value. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2016;12:e250-258.
15. Agarwal G, Pradeep PV, Aggarwal V, et al. Spectrum of Breast Cancer in Asian Women. World J Surg 2007;31:1031- 1040.
16. Çubuk R, Tasalı N, Midi A et al. Radyolojik olarak BI-RADS kategori 3-5 olarak değerlendirilen meme lezyonlarının histopatolojik değerlendirilmesinde ultrason rehberliğinde yapılan tru-cut iğne biyopsinin etkinliği: Üç yıllık deneyimimiz. Maltepe Tıp Dergisi / Maltepe Medical Journal 2009;1:23-27.
17. Apffelstaedt SP, Dalmayer L, Baatjes K. Mammographic screening for breast cancer in a resource-restricted environment. S Afr Med J 2014;104:294-296.
18. Kayhan A, Gürdal SÖ, Özaydın N et al. Uzun dönem toplum tabanli Bahçeşehir meme kanseri tarama projesinin ilk dönem sonuçlari. J Breast Health 2012:8:180-184.