Prenatal tanı amacıyla kordosentez uygulanan 172 olgunun değerlendirilmesi

Yüksek riskli gebeliklerde fetal kromozom analizi sonuçlarının incelenmensi amacıyla. Dicle Üniversitesinde Temmuz 2001-Aralık2004 tarihleri arasında kordosentez yapılan 172 olgu değerlendirildi. Kordosentez serisinde endikasyonların büyük çoğunluğunu ileri yaş, pozitif triple test ve fetal anomali saptanan olgular oluşturdu. Bu endikasyonlarda % 7.5 oranında fetal kromozom anomalisine rastlandı. Fetal anomali grubunda Trizomi 21,18,13 tipi kromozom anomalilerine daha sık rastlandığı gözlendi. Girişimlerdeki başarı oranı %98.8 olarak saptandı. Sonuç olarak kordosentez modern perinatolojide emniyetli ve uygulanması kolay bir prenatal tanı ve tedavi yöntemidir.

Prenatal diagnoses with cordocentesis: Evaluation of 172 cases

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of 172 cordosentesis cases for chromosomal analysis in high risk pregnant patients which were performed in our clinic during 2001 and 2004. Cordosentesis procedure were performed mainly for, fetal anomaly, positive triplescreening test. Fetal chromosomal anomaly ratio was 7.5%. Trisomi 21,18,13 were found in fetal anomaly group. The invasive procedure success rate was %98.8. Cordosentes is a safe and easily performed prenatal diagnosis and treatment method in modern perinatology.

___

  • 1. Romero R, Athanassiadis AP.: Fetal blood sampling: The principles and practice of ultrasonogrraphy in obstetrics and gynecology. Dördüncü baskı. Fleischer AC.(ed) Appleton & Lange, Connecticut 1991, S: 455.
  • 2. Grannum PA, Copel JA.: Invasive fetal procedures. Radiol Clin North Am 1990; 28: 217.
  • 3. Nicolaides KH, Rodeck CH.: Fetal blood sampling. Baillier’s Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 1: 623.
  • 4. Weiner Cp, Wenstrom KD, Sipes SP.: Risk factors for cordocentesis and fetal intravascular transfusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991: 165: 1021.
  • 5. Weiner Cp.: Cordocentesis. Obster Gynecol Clin North Am 1988; 15:283.
  • 6. Pielet BW, Socol ML, MacGregor SN, Ney JA, Dooley SL.: Cordocentesis: An appraisal of risks. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 1497.
  • 7. Boulot P, Deschamps F, Lefort G, Sadra P.: Pure fetal blood samples obtained by cordocentesis: Technical spects of 322 cases. Prenat Diagn 1990; 10: 93.
  • 8. Ludomirski A, Weiner S: Percutaneous fetal umblical blood sampling. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1988; 31: 19.
  • 9. Foley MR, Sonek J, Paraskos J.: Development and initial experience with a manually controlled sprin wire device (“Cordostat”) to aid in difficult funipuncturc. Obsetet Gynecol 1991; 77:471.
  • 10.Nicolaides KH, Ermiş H.: Kordosentez: Prenatal Tanı ve Tedavi. Birinci baskı. Aydınlı K. (ED) Perspektiv, İstanbul 1992; S:66.
  • 11. Daffos F, Capella-Pavlovsky M, Forestier F.: Fetal blood sampling during pregnaney with use of a needle guided by ultrasound: A study of 606 consecutive cases Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 655.
  • 12. Bovicelli L, Orsini LF, Grannum PA.: A new funipuncture technique: Two needle ultrasound-and needle biopsyguided procedure. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 428.
  • 13. Weiner CP.: Cordocentesis for diagnostic indications Two years’experience. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 664.
  • 14. Orlandi F, Damiani G,Jakıl C.: The risks of carly cordocentesis (12-21 weeks): Analysis of 500 procedures Prenat Diagn 1990; 10: 425.
  • 15. Daffos F, Capella-Pavlovsky M, Forestier F.: A new procedure for fetal blood sampling in utero: Preliminary results of fiftythree cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 985.
  • 16. Donner C, Simon Ph, Avni F, Jauniaux E, Rodesch F.: Diagnostic cordocentesis: two years of experience. Europ J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989; 31: 119.
  • 17. Shalev E, Dan U, Weiner E, Romano S.: Prenatal diagnosis using sonographie guided cordocentesis. J Perinat Med 1989; 17: 393.
  • 18. Jauniaux E, Donner C, Simon p, Vanesse M.: i Pathologic aspects of the umblical cord after percutaneous umblical blood sampling. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 215.
  • 19. Eydoux P, Le Porrier N, et al. Chromosomal prenatal diagnosis: Study of 936 cases of intrauterine abnormalities after ultrasaund assessment. Prenat Diag. 1989;9:255