İmpresyon sitolojisi

İmpresyon sitolojisi, konjunktival göz hastalıklarının tanısında kullanılan hızlı, kolay uygulanabilen, ekonomik ve non-invazif bir tekniktir. Gözün yüzey epitelinden sellüloz asetat filtre kağıtları kullanılarak yapılan konjunktival impresyon sitolojisinin yan etkisi veya kontrendikasyonu bulunmamaktadır. Bu makalede, konjunktiva impresyon sitolojisi tekniği gözden geçirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Hücre biyolojisi, Konjunktiva, Mikroskopi, polarizasyon, Sitolojik teknikler

Impression cytology

Impression cytology is fast, easy to perform, economical and noninvasive technique for the diagnosis of conjunctival eye diseases. Conjunctival impression cytology using cellulose acetate filter paper of the ocular surface epithelium with no side effects or contraindication. In this article, technique of conjunctival impression cytology is reviewed.

Keywords:

Cell Biology, Conjunctiva, Microscopy, Polarization, Cytological Techniques,

PDF

___

1. Egbert PR, Lauber S, Maurice D.M. A simple conjunctival biopsy. Am. J. Ophthalmol 1977; 84: 798-801.
2. Thatcher RW, Darougar S, Jones BR. Conjunctival impression cytology, Arch. Ophthalmol, 1977; 95: 678-681.
3. Nelson JD. İmpression cytology. Cornea, 1988; 7: 71-81.
4. Gilbert JM, Weiss JS, Sattler AL, Koch JM. Oculer manifestations and impression cytology of anorexia nervosa. Ophthalmol, 1990; 97: 1001-1007.
5. Tseng SC. Staging of conjonctival sguamouse metaplasia by impression cytology. Ophthalmol, 1985; 92: 728-733.
6. Nelson JD, Wright JC. Conjunctival goblet cell densities in oculer surface disease. Arch.Ophthalmol, 1984; 102:1049-1051.
7. Adams GG, Dilly PN, Kirkness CM. Monitoring ocular disease by impression cytology. Eye, 1988; 2: 506-516.
8. Saini JS, Rajwanshi A, Dhar S. Clinicopathologıcal correlation of hard contact lens related changes in tarsal conjunctiva by impression cytology. Acta ophthalmol, 1990; 68: 65-70.
9. Nelson JD, Havener VR, Cameron JD. Cellulose asetate impression cytology of the ocular surface.Dry eye state. Arch Ophthalmol, 1983; 101:1869–1872.
10. Adams AD. Morfology of human conjunctival mucous. Arch Ophthalmol, 1979;97:730-734.
11. Marner K. “Snake-Like”apperance of nuclear chromatin in conjunctival epithelial cells from patients with keratokonjunctivitis sicca. Acta Ophtalmol, 1980; 58: 849-853.
12. Nelson JD. Ocular surface impressions using cellulose acetat fitler material.Ocular pemphigoid. Survey Ophthalmol, 1982; 27:67-69.
13. Götz ML, Kruse FE, Jager W. Die impressions cytology der bindehaut-eine nichtinvasive untersuchungs-methodeII, lightmikroskopische befunde bei normaler conjunctiva, bei keratokonjunctivitis sicca und bei kontaktlinsentraegern. Fortschr Ophthalmol 1986; 83:34-38.
14. Maskin SL, Bode DD. Elektron microscopy of impression-acguired conjunctival epithelial cells. Ophthalmol, 1986; 93:1518-1523.
15. Natadisastra GN, Wittpenn JR, West KP, Sommer A. İmpression cytology for detection of vitamin a deficiency. Arch Ophthalmol, 1987; 105: 1224-1228.
16. Wittpenn JR, Tseng SCG, Sommer A. Detection of early xerophthalmi by impression cytology. Arch Ophthalmol, 1986; 104: 237-239.
17. Cakmak SS, Unlu MK, Karaca C, Nergiz Y, Ipek S. Effects of soft contact lenses on conjunctival surface. Eye Contact lens, 2003;29:230-233.