Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound Guided Pectoral Nerve Block Type II and Erector Spinae Plane Block in Breast Cancer Surgery

Objectives: To compare the effect of ultrasound guided Pectoral Nerve Block 2 (PECs 2) and Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP) for post op analgesia in patients undergoing Breast cancer surgery Methods: This observationally planned study included 40 patients over the age of ages of 18 who are of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III and scheduled for elective surgery due to breast malignancy were included in the study. PECs 2 block was applied to the patients after the induction of general anesthesia in Group 1 and ESP block was applied to the patients after the induction of general anesthesia in Group 2. In the postoperative period, visual analog scale (VAS) values, nausea, vomiting and sedation score values and analgesic doses used by all patients in the post-operative period were recorded. Results: Intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption was statistically significantly lower in the PECs block group than in the ESP group. Postoperative analgesia time was longer in the PECs group. The number of patients requiring rescue opioid in the post-operative period was statistically significantly lower in the PECs group. There was no difference between the groups in terms of complications, mobilization time, time of discharge, postoperative nausea-vomiting (PONV) and terms of sedation. Conclusions: In patients who underwent breast surgery for malignancy, we found that the ultrasound (US) guided PECs 2 block achieved more effective postoperative analgesia compared to ESP block.

Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound Guided Pectoral Nerve Block Type II and Erector Spinae Plane Block in Breast Cancer Surgery

Objectives: To compare the effect of ultrasound guided Pectoral Nerve Block 2 (PECs 2) and Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP) for post op analgesia in patients undergoing Breast cancer surgery Methods: This observationally planned study included 40 patients over the age of ages of 18 who are of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III and scheduled for elective surgery due to breast malignancy were included in the study. PECs 2 block was applied to the patients after the induction of general anesthesia in Group 1 and ESP block was applied to the patients after the induction of general anesthesia in Group 2. In the postoperative period, visual analog scale (VAS) values, nausea, vomiting and sedation score values and analgesic doses used by all patients in the post-operative period were recorded. Results: Intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption was statistically significantly lower in the PECs block group than in the ESP group. Postoperative analgesia time was longer in the PECs group. The number of patients requiring rescue opioid in the post-operative period was statistically significantly lower in the PECs group. There was no difference between the groups in terms of complications, mobilization time, time of discharge, postoperative nausea-vomiting (PONV) and terms of sedation. Conclusions: In patients who underwent breast surgery for malignancy, we found that the ultrasound (US) guided PECs 2 block achieved more effective postoperative analgesia compared to ESP block.

___

  • 1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016; 66: 7-30.
  • 2. Çiftci F, TolgaKafadar M. The Role Of Breast- Conserving Surgery In The Treatment Of Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Dicle Med J. 2020; 47: 852-8.
  • 3. Vadivelu N, Schreck M, Lopez PAJ, Kodumudi G, Narayan D. Pain after mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Am Surg. 2008; 74: 285-96.
  • 4. Hussain N, Brull R, McCartney CJL, et al. Pectoralis- II Myofascial Block and Analgesia in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2019; 131: 630-48.
  • 5. Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): A novel approach to breast surgery. Rev EspAnestesiolReanim. 2012; 59(9): 470-5.
  • 6. Aksu C, Kuş A, Yörükoğlu HU, Tor Kiliç C, Gürkan Y. Analgesic effect of the bi-level injection erector spinae plane block after breast surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Agri. 2019; 31: 132-7.
  • 7. He W, Wu Z, Zu L, Sun H, Yang X. Application of erector spinae plane block guided by ultrasound for postoperative analgesia in breast cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer Commun. 2020; 40: 122-25.
  • 8. Chin KJ, Adhikary S, Sarwani N, Forero M. The analgesic efficacy of pre-operative bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in patients having ventral hernia repair. Anaesthesia. 2017; 72: 452-60.
  • 9. Gürkan Y, Aksu C, Kuş A, Yörükoğlu UH, Kılıç CT. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following breast surgery: A randomized controlled study. J ClinAnesth. 2018; 50(June): 65-8.
  • 10. Altıparmak B, KorkmazToker M, Uysal Aİ, Turan M, GümüşDemirbilek S. Comparison of the effects of modified pectoral nerve block and erector spinae plane block on postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores of patients after radical mastectomy surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J ClinAnesth. 2019; 54: 61-5.
  • 11. Gad M, Abdelwahab K, Abdallah A, Abdelkhalek M, Abdelaziz M. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block compared to modified pectoral plane block for modified radical mastectomy operations. Anesth Essays Res. 2019; 13: 334.
  • 12. Hussain N, Shastri U, McCartney CJL, et al. Should Thoracic Paravertebral Blocks Be Used to Prevent Chronic Postsurgical Pain after Breast Cancer Surgery? A Systematic Analysis of Evidence in Light of IMMPACT Recommendations. Pain. 2018; 159: 1955-71.
  • 13. Ohgoshi Y, Ikeda T, Kurahashi K. Continuous erector spinae plane block provides effective perioperative analgesia for breast reconstruction using tissue expanders: A report of two cases. J ClinAnesth. 2018; 44: 1-2.
  • 14. Chiu C, Aleshi P, Esserman LJ, et al. Improved analgesia and reduced post-operative nausea and vomiting after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for total mastectomy. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018; 18: 41.
  • 15. Sinha C, Kumar A, Kumar A, et al. Pectoral nerve versus erector spinae block for breast surgeries: A randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2019; 63: 617.
  • 16. Thomas M, Philip FA, Mathew AP, Jagathnath Krishna KM. Intraoperative pectoral nerve block (Pec) for breast cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial. J AnaesthesiolClinPharmacol. 2018; 34: 318-23.
  • 17. Kulhari S, Bharti N, Bala I, Arora S, Singh G. Efficacy of pectoral nerve block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016; 117: 382-86.
  • 18. Veiga M, Costa D, y IB-RE de A. Erector spinae plane block for radical mastectomy: a new indication. Elsevier. 2018; 65: 112-5.
  • 19. Adhikary S Das, Bernard S, Lopez H, Chin KJ. Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Retrolaminar Block: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Anatomical Study. RegAnesth Pain Med. 2018; 43: 756-62.
  • 20. Kim DH, Kim S, Kim CS, et al. Efficacy of pectoral nerve block Type II for breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy: A prospective randomized controlled study. Pain Res Manag. 2018.
  • 21. Versyck B, van Geffen GJ, Van Houwe P. Prospective double blind randomized placebocontrolled clinical trial of the pectoral nerves (Pecs) block type II. J ClinAnesth. 2017; 40: 46-50.
  • 22. Helander EM, Webb MP, Kendrick J, et al. PECS, serratus plane, erector spinae, and paravertebral blocks: A comprehensive review. Best Pract Res ClinAnaesthesiol. 2019; 33: 573-81.
  • 23. Bakshi SG, Karan N, Parmar V. Pectoralis block for breast surgery: A surgical concern? Indian J Anaesth. 2017; 61: 851-52.
  • 24. Andersen KG, Kehlet H. Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: A critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention. J Pain. 2011; 12: 725-46.
  • 25. De Cassai A, Bonanno C, Sandei L, et al. PECS II block is associated with lower incidence of chronic pain after breast surgery. Korean J Pain. 2019; 32: 286-91.
Dicle Tıp Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-2945
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1963
  • Yayıncı: Cahfer GÜLOĞLU
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Results of Minimally Invasive Methods in the Treatment of Liver Hydatid Cyst

Erkan DALBAŞI, Abidin TÜZÜN

Comparison of Effects of Ketamine, Esmolol and Lidocaine on Propofol Injection Pain

Döndü Genç MORALAR, Aygen Ülkü TÜRKMEN, Aysel Hatice ALTAN

The Differences Between Cases With Primary and Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation: A Tertiary Center Study

Ahmet YESİL, Cahfer GÜLOGLU, Mehmet GEM

Farmakovijilans ve Advers Etkilerin Raporlanması Üzerine Diş Hekimlerinin Görüşlerinin Araştırılması

Zozan ERDOĞMUŞ, Zeynep ERDOĞMUŞ ÖZGEN

Parkinson Hastalığında Depresif Belirtiler ve Fiziksel Aktivite Seviyesi Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Selin KOÇ, Engin RAMAZANOĞLU, Burcu TALU

Graves hastalığı cerrahisinde güncel yaklaşımlar

Hasan Zafer ACAR

Obstetrik ve Jinekolojik Cerrahilerden Sonra Relaparotomi Yapılan Hastaların Değerlendirilmesi: Tersiyer Bir Merkezin 5 Yıllık Deneyimi

Reyhan GÜNDÜZ, Elif AĞAÇAYAK, Senem YAMAN TUNÇ, Mulaim SİZER, Ahmet YALINKAYA, Talip GÜL

Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalı’na Hatalı Tıbbi Uygulama İddiası ile Başvuran Olguların Değerlendirilmesi (2015-2019)

Toygün Anıl ÖZESEN, Kenan KAYA

Sigara İçiminin Gastrik Miyoelektrik Aktiviteye Etkisinin Araştırılması

Hamza KAYA, Hüda OFLAZOĞLU DİKEN, Hacer KAYHAN KAYA, Mustafa KELLE, Cemre UÇAR EKİN

Evaluation of the Modified HASBLED Score for Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Patients with COVID-19

Burhan ASLAN, Ümit İNCİ, Ferhat IŞIK, Mehmet Zülküf KARAHAN, Murat ÇAP, İsmail TATLI, Bedrettin BOYRAZ, Metin OKŞUL