___

• Schmalz G, Biocompatibility of Dental Materials.1st ed. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; Springer:2009. p.1-10
• Wataha JC. Principles of biocompatibility for dental practitioners. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86(2):203–9.
• Hanks CT, Wataha JC, Sun Z. In vitro models of biocompatibility: ;12:186–193. Schmalz Biocompatibility of Dental Materials. 1st ed. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; Springer:2009. p.13-40
• Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig's restorative dental materials. 12th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2006. p.97-125
• R. Ian Freshney Culture of Animal Cells: A Manual of Basic Technique, Fifth Edition,. Haboken; John Wiley & Sons: 2005.p.1-216
• Candan Ç., Bilgiç A., Klinik Viroloji Labaratuvarında Uzmanlık Öğrencisine Verilen Hücre Kültürü Eğitim Programı: Bir Model, İnfeksiyon Dergisi (Turkish Journal of Infection) 2006; 20 (3): 231-241
• Helgason CD, Miller CL. Methods in moleculer biology. Press:2005. p. 1-12
• Murray PE, García Godoy C, García Godoy F.How is the evaluated? Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. ;12(3):E258-66. review. Dent Mater. G, Dorthe Arenholt Bindslev. Third edition. Tatowa; Humana biocompatibilty of dental biomaterials Aldridge WN. The biochemical principles of toxicology. Nicholson JW.The Chemistry of Medical and Dental Materials. Cambridge; The Royal Society of Chemistry: 2002. p.186-195
• ISO 7405.Dentistry -- Preclinical evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry -- Test methods for dental materials.
• ISO 10993-5. Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity. Moharamzadeh K, Brook
• Biocompatibility of Resin-based Dental Materials. Materials. 2009; 2(2): 514-548 IM, Noort RV.
• Polyzois, GL. In vitro evaluation of dental materials. Clin Mater. 1994, 16, 21-60
• Tang AT, Li J, Ekstrand J, Liu Y.Cytotoxicity tests of in situ polymerized resins: methodological comparisons and introduction of a tissue culture insert as a testing device.J Biomed Mater Res. ;45(3):214-22
• Schmalz, G. The agar overlay method. Int. Endod. J. 1988. 21: 59-66.
• Wennberg A, Hasselgren G, Tronstad L. A method for toxicity screening of biomaterials using cells cultured on Millipore filters. J Biomed Mater Res ;13:109-20. Outhwaite WC, McKenzie DM, Pashley DH. A versatile split-chamber device for studying dentin permeability. J Dent Res 1974;53(6):1503.
• Tyas MJ. A method for the in vitro toxicity testing of dental restorative materials. J Dent Res ;56: 1285–1290
• Hume WR. A new technique for screening chemical toxicity to the pulp from dental restorative materials and procedures. J Dent Res 1985; 64: –1325
• Schmalz G, Garhammer P, Schweiki H. A commercially available cell culture device modified for dentin barrier tests. J Endod 1996;22:249–252
• Schmalz G., Hiller K., Nunez L., Stoll J., Weis K. Permeability Characteristics of Bovine and Human Dentin under Different Pretreatment Conditions. J Endod 2001;27:23–30
• R. Ian Freshney Culture of Animal Cells: A Manual of Basic Technique, Fifth Edition, John Wiley & Sons 2005, Inc., p:359-373
• Jenkins N. Methods in Biotechnology, Volume 8: Animal cell biotechnology Totawa NJ, Humana Press p:239-252
• Babich H, Reisbaum AG, Zuckerbraun HL. In Vitro Response of Human Gingival Epithelial S-G Cells to Resveratrol, Toxicol Letter 2000; 114: 143–53
• Aksoy Y. Antioksidan Mekanizmada Glutatyonun Rolü. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2002;22(4):442
• Lefeuvre M, Amjaad W, Goldberg M, Stanislawski L. TEGDMA induces mitochondrial damage and oxidative stress in human gingival fibroblasts. Biomaterials 2005;26:5130–5137
• Lefeuvre M, Bourd K, Loriot MA, Goldberg M, Beaune P, Perianin A. TEGDMA modulates glutathionetransferase P1 activity in gingival fibroblasts. J Dent Res 2004;83:914–9.
• Deneke SM, Fanburg BL. Regulation of cellular glutathione. Am J Physiol 1989; 257: L163-L173
• Mantellini MG, Botero TM, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Hanks CT, Nör JE. Adhesive resin induces apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest of pulp cells. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 592–596
• Maron, D.M., Ames, B.N.: Revised method for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 1983; : 173–215
• Schweikl, H., Schmalz, G.: Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate induceslarge deletions in the hprt gene of V79 cells. Mutat Res 1999: 438: 71–78.
• Soderholm KJ, Mariotti A. BIS-GMA-based resins in dentistry: Are they safe? Am Dent Assoc 1999;130: –209 Schmalz G,
• Biocompatibility of dental Materials. 1st ed. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; Springer:2009. P.99-130
• Zorba YO., Yıldız M. Adeziv restoratif materyallerde biyouyumluluk testleri ve kriterleri. Atatürk Üniv. Di_ Hek. Fak. Derg. 2007: ;Suppl.: 2, S: 15-21
• Schmalz G. The biocompatiblity of non-amalgam dental materials. filling Eur J Oral Sci ;106:696-706. Geurtsen W. Biocompatiblity of resin-modified filling materials. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med ;11:333-355. Frankild, S., Volund, A., Wahlberg, J.E., Andersen, K.E.: Comparison of the sensitivities of the Buehler test and the guinea pig maximization test for predictive testing of contact allergy. Acta Derm Venereol 2000; 80: 256–262