The relation between institutional investors (Dedicated and Transient) and stock price synchronicity in Iran stock market

Abstract. This paper reviews the relation between institutional investors (dedicated and transient) and synchronicity of stock prices. In this research the relation kind of dedicated and transient institutional stockholders with the price synchronicity (a scale to measure the relative amount of the company’s specific information reflected in the price) have been examined considering the monitoring incentives and also the investment horizon of these investors. The hypotheses relating this research have been examined through simple and multiple linear regressions, panel data, and via Eviews software. The findings of this study indicates that the monitoring of dedicated institutional investors leads to reduce the access of managers to the cash flow of the company and also decreases the risk taken by managers which conclude to a decline in R2 and therefore the simultaneity of stock prices shrinks.

___

  • An, H., Zhang,T., 2013. "Stock price synchronicity, crash risk, and institutional investors".
  • J. Corporate Finance. 21, pp.1-15
  • Maug, E., 1998. "Large shareholders as monitors: is there a tradeoff between liquidity and control?" J. Finance 53, pp.65–98.
  • Kahn, C., Winton, A., 1998. Ownership structure, speculation, and shareholder intervention. J. Finance 53, pp.99–129.
  • Chen, Q., Goldstein, I., Wei, J., 2007a. "Price informativeness and investment sensitivity to stock price". Rev. Financ. Stud. 20,pp. 619–650.
  • Bushee, B., 1998. "The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior". Account. Rev. 73, pp.305–333.
  • Gaspar, J.M., Massa, M., Matos, P., 2005. "Shareholder investment horizons and the market for corporate control. "J. Financ. Econ. 76, pp.135–165.
  • Roll, R., 1988. R2. J. Finance 43,pp. 541–566.
  • Jin, L., Myers, S.C., 2006. R2 around the world: new theory and new tests. J. Financ. Econ. 79, pp.257–292.
  • Chen, X., Harford, J., Li, K., 2007b." Monitoring: which institutions matter? J. Financ. "Econ. 86, pp.279–305.
  • Ahmad poor.A & Peilar negar ghale rudkhani .S (2012), "specifying the relation between the components of the quality of committed items and cost synchronization in exchange market of Tehran", seasonal magazine of exchange market, no.16, pp. 137-151,(in Persian)
  • Yan, X.S., Zhang, Z., 2009. "Institutional investors and equity returns: are short-term institutions better informed?" Rev. Financ. Stud. 22, pp.893–924.
  • Baik, B., Kang, J.-K., Kim, J.-M., 2010. "Local institutional investors, information asymmetries, and equity returns. "J. Financ. Econ. 97, pp.81–106.
  • Bushee, B.J., Goodman, T.H., 2007. "Which institutional investors trade based on private information about earnings and returns?" J. Account. Res. 45, pp.289–321.
  • Morck, R., Yeung,B., Yu ,W., 2000. "The Information Content of Stock Markets: Why Do
  • Emerging Markets have Synchronous Stock Price Movements?".J.Financial Economics . 58 (1– 2), pp.215–60. Morck, R., Yeung, B., Yu, W., 2000. "The information content of stock markets: why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movement?" J. Financ. Econ. 58, pp. 215–260.
  • Haggard, K.S., Martin, X., Pereira, R., 2008." Does voluntary disclosure improve stock price informativeness?" Financ. Manag. 37,pp. 747–768.
  • Ahmad poor.A & Peilar negar ghale rudkhani .S (2012), "the study of the relation between the interest quality and cost synchronization of companies accepted in exchange market of
  • Tehran", seasonal magazine of exchange market, no.16 ,(in Persian)