TÜRK ÖĞRENCİLERİN KİTAP OKUMAMA SORUNUNA ÇÖZÜM ÖNERİLERİ

Yaşamakta olduğumuz bilgi çağının teknolojik ürünleri her geçen gün hayatımızda varlıklarını giderek daha fazla hissettirmektedirler. Bu ürünlerin, çok önemli ve vazgeçilmez faydalarının ve sağladıkları kolaylıkların yanında haberleşme, araştırma, taşınabilirlik, konfor vb. görmezden gelemeyeceğimiz birçok olumsuz yönleri de yok değildir. Özellikle, bilgisayar ve internete olan erişim kolaylığı en çok genç kuşakları esareti altına almakta, birbirinden çekici grafik, içerik ve tasarımlarıyla sayısız bilgisayar oyunu ve web siteleri genç kullanıcıları kendilerine bir mıknatıs gibi çekmekte ve onları ekran başına kilitlemektedir. Bununla birlikte boyutları kibrit kutusu ve okul tahtası arasında değişen dijital pencereler tarafından saatlerce hipnotize edilen gençlerimiz ne yazık ki giderek daha az kitap okumaktadırlar. Bilgi çağını bilgisizce yaşayan, zamanlarının büyük bir bölümünü sanal ortamlarda geçiren ve kendilerine yarınlarımızı teslim edeceğimiz genç nesli bu bağımlılıktan kurtarmak ve tekrar okumaya sevk etmek akademisyenler, araştırmacılar, öğretmenler, anne ve babalar olarak hepimize düşen bir görevdir. Bu çalışmanın amacı konu ile ilgili yapılan yeni araştırmaları okur ile paylaşmak ve toplumun kültür düzeyini arttırmak amacıyla genç kuşağa okumayı sevdirmek için yapılabilecekleri tartışmaktır. Makalenin sonunda okuma alışkanlığının kazandırılması konusunda yapılmasında fayda görülenlerle ilgili öneriler yer almaktadır.

Türk Öğrencilerin Kitap Okumama Sorununa Çözüm Önerileri

The influence of technological products of the information age we live in is felt in our life much more than ever before Besides its significant and indispensable benefits like communication research transport comfort and etc it has certain unfavorable aspects which cannot be overlooked Particularly easy access to computer and internet facilities mostly enslave the young generations; computer games made of appealing graphic design and contents as well as websites attract the youth like a magnet and lock them to the monitor In addition young people hypnotized by digital windows whose screen size may change from a match box to a black board gradually read much less than previously Our primary responsibility as academicians researchers teachers and parents is to save the young generation from this serious addiction and encourage them to read for these young people to whom we will entrust our tomorrow without awareness experience the information age by spending most of their time in virtual settings The purpose of this study is to share new research on the topic with the reader and discuss what can be done in order to motivate the young generation to read so that a highly cultured society is attained At the end of the article suggestions and implications are provided which are necessary to form a well established reading habit Key words: Reading habit Pleasure Reading Sustained Silent Reading Accelerated Reading

___

  • Ainley, M., Hidi, S., ve Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545-561.
  • Allington, R. (1995). Access to books: Variations in schools and classrooms. The Language and Literacy Spectrum, 5, 23-25.
  • Allington, R. L., ve McGill-Franzen, A. (2003). The impact of summer setback on the reading achievement gap. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(1), 68-75.
  • Allington, R.L., ve Cunningham, P.M. (1996). Schools that work: Where all children read and write. Harper Collins College Publishers. New York: NY.
  • Anbar, A. (1986). Reading acquisition of preschool children without systematic instruction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 1, 69-83.
  • Anderson, C.R., Wilson, P.T., ve Fielding, L.G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 285-303.
  • Applegate, A.J., Applegate, M.D. (2004). The Peter Effect: Reading habits and attitudes of preservice teachers. The Reading Teacher, 57, 554-563.
  • Aranha, M. (1985). Sustained silent reading goes East. The Reading Teacher, 39, 214- 217.
  • Abcı, G. (2009). Türkiye'de Kütüphanelerin Kitap Okutma Stratejileri Yok ! http://www.memurlar.biz/haber/20090729/Kutuphane-Politikamiz-Ne-Durumda.php
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Block, C., Mangieri, J.N. (2002). Recreational reading: 20 years later. The Reading Teacher, 55, 572- 581.
  • Bryan, G., Fawson, P.C., Reutzel, D.R., (2003). Sustained Silent Reading: Exploring the value of literature discussion with three non-engaged readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 43, 47-73.
  • Campbell, M.B., Kmiecik, M.M., (2004). The greatest literacy challenges facing contemporary high school teachers: Implications for secondary teacher preparation. Reading Horizons, 45, 1-25.
  • Collins, C. (1980). Sustained silent reading periods: Effect on teacher's behavior and students' achievement. The Elementary School Journal. 81,109-114.
  • Covey, Sean. (1998). The Seven Habits of Highly Effective Teens. New York, New York: Simon ve Schuster, Inc.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Literacy and intrinsic motivation. Daedalus, 119 (2), 115- 140.
  • Curtis, M.E., ve Longo, A.M. (1999). When Adolescents Can't Read: Methods and Materials That Work. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
  • Deci, E.L., ve Ryan, R.M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Selfdetermination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 109-134.
  • Dully, M. (1989). The relation between sustained silent reading to reading achievement and attitude of the at-risk student. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 312 631)
  • Dwyer, E., ve Reed, V. (1989). Effects of sustained silent reading on attitudes toward reading. Reading Horizons, 29, 283-293.
  • Dymock, S.J. (2000). The effect of sustained silent reading on reading comprehension: A review of the research. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, 50th annual meeting, Scottsdale, AZ. Einhorn, J.A. (1979).
  • Fisher, D. (2004). Setting the "opportunity to read" standard: Resuscitating the SSR program. Journal of Adolescent ve Adult Literacy, 48, 138-149.
  • Friedinann, E., Thomas, S. A., ve Eddy, T.J. (2000). Companion animals and human health: Physical and cardiovascular influences. In A. L. Podberscek, E. S. Paul, ve J. A.
  • Serpell (Eds.), Companion animals and us: Exploring the relationship between people and pets (pp. 125-142). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gallik, J.D., (1999). Do they read for pleasure? Recreational reading habits of college students. Journal of Adolescent ve Adult Literacy, 42, 480-489.
  • Gambrell, L.B. (1981). The clip sheet. The Reading Teacher, 34, 836-838.
  • Goodman, K., ve Goodman, Y. (1982). Spelling ability of a self-taught reader. In F.
  • Gollasch (ED.), Language and literacy: The selected works of Kenneth S. Goodman, 2, 22-1226. London: Routledge ve Kegan Paul.
  • Greaney, V. ve Hegarty, M. (1987). Correlates of leisure-time reading. Journal of Reading, 10 (1), 3-20.
  • Heimlich, K. (2001). Animal-assisted therapy and the severely disabled child: A quantitative study. Journal of Rehabilitation, 67(4), 48-56.
  • Henry, T. (2001, December 4). Getting a read on US teens. US Today, p. 7D.
  • Holloway, J.H. (1999). Improving the reading skills of adolescents. Educational Leadership, 80-81.
  • Jalongo, M. R., Fennimore, B. A., ve Stamp, L. N. (2004). The acquisition of literacy: Reframing definitions, paradigms, ideologies, and practices. In O. N. Saracho ve B. Spodek (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives oH language policy and literacy instruction ill early childhood education. Greenwich, CT: information Age Publishing.
  • Krashen, S. (2001). More smoke and mirrors: A critique of the National Reading Panel Report on Fluency. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(2), 119-123.
  • Krashen, S. 2004. The Power of Reading. Westport, CONN: Libraries Unlimited and Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Luttrell, W., Parker, C., (2001). High school students' literacy practices and identities, and the figured world of school. Journal of Research in Reading, 24, 235-247.
  • McKenna, M.C., Kear, D.J., Ellsworth, R.A. (1995). Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey, Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 934-954.
  • Mckool, S.S. (2007). Factors That Influence the Decision to Read: An Investigation of Fifth Grade Students' Out-of-School Reading Habits. Reading Improvement. 44 (3), 111 -120.
  • Melson, G. F. (2001). Why the wild things are. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  • Morrow, L. M., Gambrell, L. B., ve Pressley, M. (Eds.). (2003). Best practices in literacy instruction (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
  • Nagy, N.M., Campenni, C.E., ve Shaw, J.N. (2000). A survey of sustained silent reading practices in seventh-grade classrooms. Reading Online [On-line]. 1-12. Available: www.readingonline.org/articles/nagy/ssr.html.
  • Neuman, S. (1986). The home environment and fifth-grade students' leisure reading. Elementary School Journal, 83, 131-137.
  • Nord, C.W., Brimhall, D., ve West, J. (1997). Fathers' involvement in their children's schools (NCES 98-091). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED409125)
  • Norton, B. (2003). The motivating power of comic books: Insights from Archie comic readers. The Reading Teacher, 57, 141-147.
  • Pavonetti, L.M., Brimmer, K.M., Cipielewski, J.F. (2002). Accelerated Reader: what are the lasting effects on the reading habits of middle school students exposed to Accelerated Reader in elementary grades? Journal of Adolescent ve Adult Literacy, 46, 300-312.
  • Rosenblatt, Louise. M. (1978). The Reader, the Text, the Poem. Southern Illinois: University-Press.
  • Ryan, R.M., ve Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Clasic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
  • Shannon, P. (1995). Texts, lies, ve videotape: Stories about life, literacy, ve learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
  • Strommen, L.T., Mates, B.F. (2004). Learning to love reading: Interviews with older children and teens. Journal of Adolescent ve Adult Literacy, 48, 188-199.
  • Swanborn, M. S. L., ve de Glopper, K. (2002). Impact of reading purpose on incidental word learning from context. Language Learning, 52(1), 95-117.
  • Taylor, D.L. (2004). "Not just boring stories": Reconsidering the gender gap for boys. Journal of Adolescent ve Adult Literacy, 48, 290-298.
  • Wilson, J.D., Casey L. H., (2007). Understanding the Recreational Reading Patterns of Secondary Students. Reading Improvement, 44(1), 40-48.
  • Worthy, J., Moorman, M., ve Turner, M. (1999). What Johnny likes to read is hard to find in school. Reading Research Quarterly. 34 (1), 12- 27.
  • Worthy, J., Moorman, M., Turner, M. (1999). What Johnny likes to read is hard to find in school. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 12-27.
  • Yoon, C.-K., Kim, J.-Y., Yi, S.-K., ve Yi, H.-S. (2000). A national survey of reading. Seoul, South Korea: Korean Research Center for Publications.
Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1304-8880
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi