EĞİTİM KURUMLARINDAKİ KADINLARIN İDARİ POZİSYONLARDA BAŞARISIZLIK ALGISINI YARATAN ENGELLER ÜZERİNE NİTEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Günümüzde cinsiyet ayrımcılığı ve cam tavan problemini aşmaya yönelik çeşitli ilerlemeler sağlanmasınarağmen pratikte bu problemlerin yüksek oranlarda devam ettikleri görülmektedir. Cinsiyet ayrımcılığı gereközel sektörde gerek kamu kurumlarında ortaya çıkabilmektedir. Kadınların erkeklere göre çok düşük oranlardaidarecilik pozisyonlarına geldiği görülen eğitim kurumları bu tür problemlerin sıkça karşılaşıldığı alanlardan birtanesi olarak kabul görmektedir. Bu çalışmada, kadın öğretmenlerin idarecilik pozisyonuna erişimi ve idarecilikkonusunda başarısız görülme algısını yaratan nedenlerin ortaya çıkarılması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada nitel biraraştırma yöntemi olan içerik analizi yapılmış, sıklık ve kategori analiz teknikleri kullanılmıştır. Bu doğrultudabir sosyal medya ağında yer alan 399 yorum sıklık durumlarına göre kategoriye ayrılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarınagöre kadınların “egolu olmaları, duygularıyla hareket etmeleri, duygusal, kaprisli, kompleksli, kibar, yumuşak,düşünceli olmaları” vb. nedenlerden dolayı idarecilik yapmada başarısız algılandıkları görülmüştür.

A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ON THE ARTIFICIAL OBSTACLES CREATES FAILURE PERCEPTION AT MANAGEMENT POSITIONS OF WOMEN IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

Today, although various advances have been made to overcome the problem of gender discrimination and glass ceiling, it is seen that these problems persist in high rates in practice. Gender discrimination might occur both in the private sector and in public institutions. Educational institutions where women are seen to be in administrative positions at very low rates compared to men, are considered as one of the areas where such problems are frequently encountered. In this study, it is aimed to reveal the artificial barriers that create the perception of women teachers' access to the management position and the perception of being unsuccessful in the management. Content analysis that is a qualitative research method was used as a method, frequency and category analysis techniques were applied in order for analysis. In accordance with, 399 comments in a social media network were categorized in terms of their frequency. According to the results of the analysis, it was observed that women were detected unsuccessfully due to the reasons such as “being egoist, acting with emotions, being emotional, capricious, complex, polite, soft and thoughtful etc.”.

___

  • Adler, N. J. (1993). An international perspective on the barriers to the advancement of women managers. Applied Psychology, 42(4), 289-300.
  • Altınışık, S. (1995). Kadın öğretmenlerin okul müdürü olmasının engelleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 1(3), 333-334.
  • Arat, N. (1996). Türkiye’de kadınların çalışma yaşamında karşılaştıkları zorlukların sosyo-kültürel nedenleri. Arat N.(der) Türkiye'de Kadın Olmak, Say Yayınları, İstanbul, 43-54.
  • Ataay, N. A. (1998). Kadın Yöneticilerin Kariyer Boyutları ve Etenleri. 20. Yüzyılın Sonunda Kadınlar ve Gelecek Konferansı, (Ed: Oya Çitci), TODAİE Yayınları, Yayın No: 285.
  • Bakır, A. A., Uğurlu, C. T., Köybaşı, F., & Özyazıcı, K. (2017). Kadın okul yöneticileri üzerine nitel bir araştırma. Current Research in Education, 3(1), 1-14.
  • Budworth, M. H., & Mann, S. L. (2010). Becoming a leader: The challenge of modesty for women. Journal of Management Development, 29(2), 177-186.
  • Can, N. (2010). Okul yöneticilerinin yönetimde cinsiyet faktörüne ilişkin görüşleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(147), 35-41.
  • Caprino K. (2013). The Top 6 Reasons Women Are Not Leading In Corporate America As We Need Them To, 16 Ekim 2020 tarihinde https://www.forbes.com/sites/kathycaprino/2013/02/12/the-top-6-reasonswomen-are-not-leading-in-corporate-america-as-we-need-themto/#725d84db406e adresinden alundı.
  • Cortis, R., & Cassar, V. (2005). Perceptions of and about women as managers: investigating job involvement, self‐esteem and attitudes. Women in Management Review.
  • Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social forces, 80(2), 655-681.
  • Cottingham, J., Fonn, S., García-Moreno, C., Gruskin, S., Klugman, B., Mwau, A. N., ... & World Health Organization. (2001). Transforming health systems: gender and rights in reproductive health: a training manual for health managers. In Transforming health systems: gender and rights in reproductive health: a training manual for health managers/Jane Cottingham...[et al.]; edited by TK Sundari Ravindran.
  • Curtis, M., Schmid, C., & Struber, M. (2012). Gender diversity and corporate performance. Credit Suisse, Research Institute.
  • Çelikten, M. (2004). Okul müdürü koltuğundaki kadınlar: Kayseri ili örneği. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(17), 91-118.
  • Derks, B., Van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2016). The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 456-469.
  • Dezsö, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072-1089.
  • Eagly, A. H. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of women quarterly, 31(1), 1-12.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The leadership quarterly, 14(6), 807-834.
  • Ellemers, N., Van den Heuvel, H., De Gilder, D., Maass, A., & Bonvini, A. (2004). The underrepresentation of women in science: differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(3), 315-338.
  • Ergenç, A. (2011). Web 2.0 ve sanal sosyalleşme: Facebook örneği (Master's thesis, Maltepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
  • Ergeneli, A., & Akçamete, C. (2004). Bankacılıkta Cam Tavan: Kadın ve Erkeklerin Kadın Çalışanlar ve Kadınların Üst Yönetime Yükseltilmelerine Yönelik Tutumları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2), 85-109.
  • Ergün, Ş. (1996). İlköğretim müfettişlerinin okul yönetiminde kadınların ve erkeklerin yeteneklerine ilişkin tutumları. Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 227, 24-29.
  • Experteer Magazine (2018), How can companies work to decrease the gender gap: Why Aren’t More Women in Power Positions?, 16 Ekim 2020 tarihinde https://us.experteer.com/magazine/why-arent-more-women-in-power-positions/ adresinden alındı.
  • Fiermani, J. (1990, December). Do women manage differently? Fortune, 115- 118.
  • Foley, S., Ngo, H. Y., & Loi, R. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of perceived personal gender discrimination: A study of solicitors in Hong Kong. Sex Roles, 55(3-4), 197-208.
  • Fuhrmans V. (2020). Where Are All the Women CEOs?: The traditional stepping stones to the chief executive position are jobs responsible for the bottom line—such as head of division—and those roles are still overwhelmingly filled by men, 16 Ekim 2020 tarihinde https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-so-few-ceos-are-women-youcan-have-a-seat-at-the-table-and-not-be-a-player-11581003276 adresinden alındı.
  • Global Education Monitoring Report (2017). There is a Hard Ceiling for Women in School and University Leader Positions, https://gem-report2017.unesco.org/en/chapter/gender_monitoring_leadership/, 19 Ekim 2020 tarihinde adresinden alındı.
  • Goode, W. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483-496.
  • Göker, G., & Doğan, A. (2011). Ağ Toplumunda Örgütlenme: Facebook'ta Çevrimiçi Tekel Eylemi. Balikesir University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 14(25).
  • Haslam, S. A., & Ryan, M. K. (2008). The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(5), 530-546.
  • Herrbach, O., & Mignonac, K. (2012). Perceived gender discrimination and women’s subjective career success: The moderating role of career anchors. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 67(1), 25-50.
  • Hoobler, J. M., Hu, J., & Wilson, M. (2010). Do workers who experience conflict between the work and family domains hit a “glass ceiling?”: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(3), 481-494.
  • Huang, J. (2020). How are working women doing during COVID-19? Our Women in the Workplace study explores, 19 Ekim 2020 tarihinde https://www.mckinsey.com/about-us/new-at-mckinsey-blog/how-are-workingwomen-doing-during-covid-19-our-women-in-the-workplace-study-explores adresinden alındı.
  • Johnson, C., Long, J., & Faught, S. (2014). The Need to Practice What We Teach: The Sticky Floor Effect in Colleges of Business in Southern US Universities. Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 10(1), 27-33.
  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation. Basic Books, New York, NY. Karaca, A. (2007). Kadın yöneticilerde kariyer engelleri: cam tavan sendromu üzerine uygulamalı bir araştırma (Doctoral dissertation, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
  • Kee, H. J. (2006). Glass ceiling or sticky floor? Exploring the Australian gender pay gap. Economic Record, 82(259), 408-427.
  • Köroğlu, F. (2006). Okul yönetiminde cinsiyet etkeni ve kadın öğretmenlerin okul yöneticiliği talepleri. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
  • KSSGM Yayınları (1999). Cinsiyete Dayalı Ayrımcılık: Türkiye’de Eğitim Sektörü Örneği.
  • Kuhn, P., & Shen, K. (2012). Gender discrimination in job ads: Evidence from China. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), 287-336.
  • Mavin, S. (2008). Queen bees, wannabees and afraid to bees: no more ‘best enemies’ for women in management? British Journal of Management, 19, S75-S84.
  • Metz, I., & Tharenou, P. (2001). Women’s career advancement: The relative contribution of human and social capital. Group & Organization Management, 26(3), 312-342.
  • Milli Eğitim Temel Kanunu (1973), T. C. Resmi Gazete, 14574, 24 Haziran 1973.
  • Morgan, M. S. (2017). Glass ceilings and sticky floors: Drawing new ontologies. Cultures without Culturalism: The Making of Scientific Knowledge.
  • Morrison, A. M., White, R. P., & Van Velsor, E. (1987). The narrow band. Leadership in Action, 7(2), 1-7.
  • Network of Executive Women (2017). The Female Leadership Crisis Why women are leaving (and what we can do about it), 19 Ekim 2020 tarihinde https://www.newonline.org/sites/default/files/files/NEW_Leadership_Crisis_Dig italv3.pdf adresinden alındı.
  • Ngo, H. Y., Tang, C. S. K., & Au, W. W. T. (2002). Behavioural responses to employment discrimination: A study of Hong Kong workers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(8), 1206-1223.
  • Pande, R., & Ford, D. (2011). Gender Quotas and Female Leadership: A Review. Worldbank, 20 Haziran 2019 tarihinde http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fbe6/4bbf0cf10f5774b047a251d4def4b72e80c7.p df adresinden alındı.
  • Porter, N. B. (2006). Re-defining Superwoman: An essay on overcoming the maternal wall in the legal workplace. Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y, 13, 55.
  • Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. (1994). Investigating the “glass ceiling” phenomenon: An empirical study of actual promotions to top management. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 68-86.
  • Rose, S., & Larwood, L. (Eds.). (1988). Women's careers: Pathways and pitfalls. Praeger Publishers.
  • Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 549-572.
  • Sabharwal, M. (2013). From glass ceiling to glass cliff: Women in senior executive service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 399-426.
  • Sanders, M., Hrdlicka, J., Hellicar, M., Cottrell, D., & Knox, J. (2011). What stops women from reaching the top? Confronting the tough issues, 19 Ekim 2020 tarihindehttps://media.bain.com/Images/BAIN_BRIEF_What_stops_women_fro m_reaching_the_top.pdf adresinden alındı.
  • Shum, L. C., & Cheng, Y. C. (1997). Perceptions of women principals’ leadership and teachers’ work attitudes. Journal of Educational Administration.
  • Smith, P., Caputi, P., & Crittenden, N. (2012). A maze of metaphors around glass ceilings. Gender in Management: An international journal, 27(7), 436-448.
  • Spaid, E. L. (1993). Sticky floor keeps many women in low-paying jobs. The Christian Science Monitor, 13, 16 Ekim 2020 tarihinde https://www.csmonitor.com/1993/0713/13122.html adresinden alındı.
  • Spangler, E., Gordon, M. A., & Pipkin, R. M. (1978). Token women: An empirical test of Kanter's hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology, 84(1), 160-170.
  • Statista. (2020, Haziran). Nisan 2020 itibariyle Facebook kitle boyutuna göre önde gelen ülkeler, İstatistik Portalı, https://www.statista.com/statistics/268136/top-15- countries-based-on-number-of-facebook-users/
  • Still, L. V. (1997). Glass ceilings, glass walls and sticky floors: Barriers to career progress for women in the finance industry. (A report prepared for the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission and Westpac). Commonwealth of Australia.
  • Tan, J. (2008). Breaking the “bamboo curtain” and the “glass ceiling”: The experience of women entrepreneurs in high-tech industries in an emerging market. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(3), 547-564.
  • Taş, E. (2017). Okul yöneticiliği yolunda kadın öğretmenlerin karşılaştıkları kariyer engelleri üzerine bir uygulama. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 60, 493-510.
  • Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299-317.
  • Uluslararası Yatırımcılar Derneği (2016). Kadınların Üst Yönetimde Temsilinin Arttırılmasına Yönelik Uygulamalar ve Öneriler, 25 Haziran 2019 tarihinde https://www.yased.org.tr/ReportFiles/2016/YASED-KadinRaporu.pdf adresinden alındı.
  • Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1631), 20130080.
  • Valcour, M., & Ladge, J. J. (2008). Family and career path characteristics as predictors of women’s objective and subjective career success: Integrating traditional and protean career explanations. Journal of vocational behavior, 73(2), 300-309.
  • Wilson-Kovacs, D. M., Ryan, M., & Haslam, A. (2006). The glass-cliff: women's career paths in the UK private IT sector. Equal Opportunities International, 25(8), 674- 687.
  • Wright, E. O., Baxter, J., & Birkelund, G. E. (1995). The gender gap in workplace authority: A cross-national study. American Sociological Review, 407-435.
  • Wrigley, B. J. (2002). Glass ceiling? What glass ceiling? A qualitative study of how women view the glass ceiling in public relations and communications management. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14(1), 27-55.
  • Yoder, J. D., Adams, J., & Prince, H. T. (1983). The price of a token. JPMS: Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 11(2), 325.
  • Zimmer, L. (1988). Tokenism and women in the workplace: The limits of gender-neutral theory. Social problems, 35(1), 64-77.
Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1304-8880
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi