1950 Sonrası Türkiye'de Uygulanan Genel Seçim Sistemlerinin Bireysel Tercihlerin Kolektif Tercihlere Yansıması Açısından İncelenmesi

Bu çalışmanın amacı 1950 sonrasında Türkiye'de uygulanan genel seçim sistemlerinin bireysel tercihleri kolektif tercihlere yansıtabilme gücünü, seçim sistemlerinin istikrar ve adalet kriterlerini baz alarak değerlendirmektir. Seçim sistemlerinin temel ilkeleri açıklandıktan sonra genel olarak seçim sistemleri üzerinde durulacak ayrıca 1950 ve 2002 yılları arasında Türkiye'de uygulanan genel seçim sistemlerinin bireysel tercihleri kolektif tercihe yansıtabilme gücü; partilerin oy oranı -mecliste sahip oldukları sandalye oranı ilişkisi, milletvekili başına düşen oy sayısı ve mecliste temsil edilemeyen oyların oranı kriterlerine bağlı olarak incelenmiştir. Seçim sistemlerinin temel ilkeleri olan temsil ve istikrar ilkeleri açısından bakıldığında sadece Milli Bakiye Sistemi'nin bireysel tercihleri kolektif tercihlere yansıtma açısından başarılı olduğu görülmüştür.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the power of the general election systems pursued between the years 1950 and 2002 to reflect individual choices into collective decisions basing on the stabilization and representation principles of election systems. Also, the power of general election systems implemented between the years 1950 and 2002 to reflect individual choices to collective choices was examined based on the relationship between votes of the political parties - the ratio of seats that political parties occupy at the assembly, vote per each representative, and the ratio of votes not represented in the assembly. Research findings suggest that national balance system is the .only system that has success at reflecting individual choices into collective choices with respect to the stabilisation and representation principles which are the fundamental principles of election systems.

___

  • Alvermann, D.,L.C. Smith, and J.E. Readance. (1985). Prior knowledge activition and the comprehension of compatible and incompatible text. Reading Research Quarterly 20: 420-36.
  • Arizona State Board of Education. (1988). Arizona social studies essential skills.
  • Phonix, Ariz.: Arizona Department of Education.
  • Beck, IJ.,and M.G. McKeown. (1988). Toward meaningful accounts in history texts for young learners. Educational Researcher 17: 31-39.
  • Brabant, S. (1989). Personal interview with a representative of Wadsworth Publishing.Conducted at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association,San Francisso.
  • Calfee, R.C. (1987). The role of text structure in acquiring knowledge. Final Report to the U.S. Department of Education (Federal Program Number 122B). Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University, Text Analysis Project.
  • Chan, J. (1979). Tradebooks: Uses and benefits for content area teaching. (Eric document reproduction service No. ED 189 578).
  • Crabtree, 'C, and D. Ravitch. (1988). History-social science framework for California public schools kindergarten though grade twelve. Sacramento: California State Department of Education.
  • Downey, M. (1986). Time, space, and culture. Social Education 50: 490-501.
  • Edelsky, C. (1989). A critique of content study. A panel presentation at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English, Baltimore.
  • Hartoonian, H. M., and M. Laughlin. (1989). Designing a social studies scope and sequence for the 21st century. Social Education 53: 388-98
  • Holmes, B., and R. Anmon. (1985). Teaching content with trade books: A strategy. Childhood Education 16: 366-70.
  • Hurd, P. (1970). New directions in teaching secondary school science. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
  • Johnson, D.D., and D.P. Pearson. (1984). Teaching reading vocabulary. 2d ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  • Johnson, H. (1925). Teaching of history in elementary and secondary schools. New York: The Macmillan Company.
  • Johnston, J. (1989). Personal interview with a representative of Merrill Publishing.Conducted at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association,San Francisco.
  • King, D.C. (1987). Delay persists in social studies reform, but signs point to headway just ahead. ASCD Curriculum Update (August): 1-8.
  • Marquand, R. (1988). The meaning of America: Is it'up for grabs'in U.S. schools? The Christian Science Monitor (April 22): Bl, B12.
  • Marr, M. B., and K. Gromley. (1982). Children's recall of familiar and unfamiliar text.Reading Research Quarterly 18: 89-104.
  • McGowan, T.M., and A. Sutton. (1988). Exploring a persistent association: Trade books and social studies teaching. Journal of Social Studies Research 12: 8- 16.
  • Memory, D.M., and T.M. McGowan. (1985). Using multilevel textboks in social studies classes. The Social Studies 76: 174-79.
  • National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1984). The reading report card. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.
  • National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1988). Who reads best? Princeton,N.J.: Educational Testing Service.
  • National Commission on Social Studies in the Schools. (1989). Charting a course: Social studies for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Commission on Social Studies in the Schools.
  • Parker, W. (1989). Participatory citizenship: Civics in the strong sense. Social Education 53: 353-54.
  • Patrick, J., and S.D. Hawke. (1982). Curriculum materials. In Social Studies in the 1980s: A Report of Project SPAN, edited by I. Morrissett. Alexanria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: 39-50.
  • Ravitch, D., and C.E. Finn, Jr. (1987). What do our 17-year-olds know? A report on the first national assessment of history and literature. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Rippa, S.A. (1988). Education in a free society: An American history. 6th ed. New York: Longman.
  • Rylant, C. (1982). When 1 was young in the mountains. New York: Dutton.
  • Sewall, G.T. (1988). American history textbooks: Where do we go from here? Phi Delta Kappan 69: 552-58.
  • The University of the State of New York, State Education Department, and Bureau of General Education Curriculum Development. (1982). K-6 social studies program. Albany, N.Y.: The State Education Department.
  • Wisconsin Department of Public Insruction. (1983). Program improvement guide for social studies education in Wisconsin. Madison, Wise: Department of Public Instruction.
  • Wong, I., and R. Calfee. (1988). Tradebooks: A viable supplement to textbooks in earth science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
  • Woodward, A., d.L. Elliott, and K.C. Nagel. (1986). Beyond textbooks in elementary social studies. Social Education 50: 50-53.