Obez ve preobez üniversite öğrencilerine sağlığı geliştirme modeline göre verilen eğitimin beslenme ve fiziksel aktivitelerine etkisi

Amaç. Bu araştırma üniversite öğrencilerine Sağlığı Geliştirme Modeline göre verilen eğitimin, öğrencilerin beslenme ve fiziksel aktivite ile ilgili bilgi, tutum ve danranışlarına etkisini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu müdahale araştırması Amasya Üniversitesinde 2017–2018 eğtim–öğretim yılında yapıldı. Beden kitle indeksi (BKİ) değeri 25 ve üzerinde olan 134 öğrenci müdahale grubuna, 132 öğrenci kontrol grubuna alındı. Öğrencilere sosyodemografik anket formu, Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışları Ölçeği (SYBDÖ) ve Uluslararası Fiziksel Aktivite Anketi (UFAA) uygulandı. Müdahale grubundaki öğrencilere, Sağlığı Geliştirme Modeline uygun olarak, sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışları ile ilgili eğitim verildi. Eğitimden üç ay sonra aynı anket ve ölçekler yeniden uygulandı Bulgular: Müdahale ve kontrol gruplarında eğitimden sonra SYBDÖ alt boyut puanlarının çoğunda önemli ölçüde artış saptandı. SYBDÖ Toplam puanı ile Sağlık Sorumluluğu ve Beslenme ve alt boyutlarında müdahale grubundaki artış kontrol grubuna göre önemli ölçüde yüksek bulundu. Eğitim sonrasında, UFAA Toplam skoru ve Yürüme alt boyutu skorundaki artış müdahale grunbunda kontrol grubuna göre önemli ölçüde yüksek bulundu.. Sonuç: Üniversite öğrencilerine Sağlığı Geliştirme Modeline göre verilen eğim, öğrencilerin özellikle sağlık sorumluluğu, beslenme ve fiziksel aktivite ile ilgili tutum ve davranışlarında önemli ölçüde iyileşme sağlamıştır.

The impact of education given to obese and preobese university students according to the health promotion model on nutrition and physical activities

Purpose: This investigation was conducted in order to evaluate the impact of education given to university students according to the Health Promotion Model (HPM) on their practices about nutrition and physical activity.Materials and Methods: This interventional study was conducted in Amasya University in the 2017–2018 educational year. Intervention and a control groups were formed from the students having a body mass index (BMI) 25 and over. A sociodemographic questionnaire, Healthy Lifestyle Behaviours Scale–II (HLBS-II), and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) were administered to the students and height and weight measures were taken. The students in the intervention group were given education on healthy lifestyle behaviours in accordance with the HPM. Results:. In the intervention and control groups, significant increases were found in the HLBS sub-scale scores after education. The increase in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group. The increase in the IPAQ total score and walking sub-dimension score was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group. Conclusion: Education according to the HPM significantly improved the behaviours of students related to health responsibility, nutrition, and physical activity.

Keywords:

Student, health promotion model, healthy lifestyle behaviours nutrition, physical activity,

PDF

___

1. Garrow JS. Obesity and Related Diseases. London, Churchill Livingstone, 1988.
2. World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Managing The Global Epidemic. WHO Technical Report Series 894, Geneva. 2000.
3. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2011-2014. NCHS Data Brief. 2015;(219):1-8.
4. OECD. Obesity Update 2017, www.oecd.org/health/obesity-update.htm (Access date: 10.02.2019).
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020 Topics & amp; Objectives: Nutrition and weight status, https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives/topic/nutrition-andweightstatus/objectives (Accessed date: 08.02.2019).
6. Dağ ZÖ, Dilbaz B. Impact of obesity on infertility in women. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2015;16:111-7.
7. Davis SR, Castelo-Branco C, Chedraui P, Lumsden MA, Nappi RE et al. Understanding weight gain at menopause. Climacteric. 2012;15:419-29.
8. Burkert NT, Rasky E, Großschädl F, Muckenhuber J, Freidl W. The relationship of weight to women's health: A matched sample study from Austria. Women Health. 2015;55:134-51.
9. Robinson JA, Burke AE. Obesity and hormonal contraceptive efficacy. Womens Health. 2013;9:453- 66.
10. Recipient M, Pınar R. Evaluation of the efficiency of training for obese patients. J Res Dev Nurs. 2008;10:32-47.
11. Tedik SE. The role of nurse in preventing overweight/obesity and promoting healthy life. Turkey Diabetes Obes J. 2017;1(2):54-62.
12. Slentz CA, Duscha BD, Johnson JL, Ketchum K, Aiken LB et al. Effects of the amount of exercise on body weight, body composition, and measures of central obesity: STRRIDE—a randomized controlled study. Arch Int Med. 2004;164:31-9. 164.1.31
13. Turkish Statistical Institute Newsletter: Youth with Statistics. 2017. Issue: 27598, May 16, 2018
14. Can G, Ozdilli K, Erol O, Unsar S, Tülek Z et al. Comparison of the health promoting lifestyles of nursing and non-nursing students in Istanbul, Turkey. Nurs Health Sci. 2008;10:273-80.
15. Ozcan S, Bozhuyuk A. Cukurova University health sciences students healthy life behavior. Cukurova Medical Journal. 2016;41:664-74.
16. Turan T, Ceylan SS, Cetinkaya B, Altundag S. Examination of obesity frequency and nutritional habits of vocational high school students. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 2009;8:5-12.
17. Pender NJ, Murdaugh CL, Parsons MA. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, 2002. p 340.
18. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381-95.
19. Öztürk M. Determination of the validity and reliability of the international physical activity questionnaire and physical activity levels of the students studying at the university. (Thesis) Ankara, Hacettepe University, 2005.
20. Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. The health promoting lifestyle profile development and psychometric characteristics. Nurs Res. 1987;36:76- 80.
21. Walker SN, Hill-Polerecky DM. Psychometric evaluation of the health-promoting lifestyle profile II. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Nebraska Medical Center 1996.
22. Bahar Z, Beser A, Gordes N, Ersin F, Kissal A. Validity and reliability study of healthy lifestyle behavior scale II. Cumhuriyet University School of Nursing Journal. 2008;12:1-13.
23. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Beslenme ve Diyetetik Bölümü. Türkiye Beslenme ve Sağlık Araştırması Sonuç Raporu Ankara, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, 2014.
24. Onurlubaş E, Doğan HG, Demirkıran S. Üniversite öğrencilerinin beslenme alışkanlıkları. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015;32(3):61-9.
25. Seifert SM, Schaechter JL, Hershorin ER, Lipshultz SE. Health effects of energy drinks on children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatrics. 2011;127:511-28.
26. Hıdıroglu S, Tanrıöver O, Ünaldı S, Sülün S, Karavus M. A survey of energydrink consumption among medical students. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63:842-5.
27. Gornicka M, Pierzynowska J, Kaniewska E, Kossakowska K, Wozniak A. School pupils and university students surveyed for drinking beverages containing caffeine. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2014;65:113-7.
28. Dumith SC, Hallal PC, Reis RS, Kahl HW. Worldwide prevalence of physical inactivity and its association with human development index in 76 countries. Prev Med. 2011;53:24-8.
29. Kostak MA, Kurt S, Milk N, River O, Ergül GD. Healthy lifestyle behaviors of nursing and primary school students. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 2014;13:189-96.
30. Yilmazel G, Cetinkaya F, Nacar, M. Health promotion behavior in nursing students. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 2013;12:261-70.
31. Şen M, Ceylan A, Kurt M, Palancı Y, Adın C. Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışları ve etkileyen faktörler. Dicle Tıp Dergisi. 2017;44:1-12.
32. Karaca T, Aslan S. Determination of health status perceptions and healthy life style behaviors of Nursing students. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019;10:734-9.
33. Nazik F, Güneş G. Üniversite öğrencilerinde problemli internet kullanımı ve sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışları. Cukurova Medical Journal. 2019;44:41-8.
34. Chen J, Xiang H, Jiang P, Yu L, Jing Y et al. The role of healthy lifestyle in the implantation of regressing boptimal health status among college students in China: A nested case-control study. IJERPH. 2017;14:240.
35. Aynacı G, Akdemir O. The relationship between lifestyle, health promotion lifestyle profile II and high blood pressure in university students. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6:1756-61.
36. Nemet D, Geva D, Pantanowitz M, Igbaria N, Meckel Y, Eliakim A. Health promotion intervention in ArabIsraeli kindergarten children. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2011;24:1001-7.
37. Altun I. Effectiveness of a health promotion course on health promotion behaviors of university students. East Mediterr Health J. 2008;14:880-7.
38. Savcı S, Öztürk M, Arıkan H. Physical activity levels of university students. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2006;34:166-72.