Ayşe Gül UYGUR, Sema ÖZANDAÇ POLAT, Fatma Yasemin ÖKSÜZLER, Mahmut ÖKSÜZLER, Ahmet Hilmi YÜCEL

Bulbus oculi morfometrik analizi ve klinik önemi

Amaç: Bulbus oculi’ye ait çap ve yükseklik ölçümleri ile klinik önemini vurgulamaktır.Gereç ve Yöntem: 19-68 yaş arası 110 kadın ve 80 erkek olmak üzere toplam 190 bireyin manyetik rezonans görüntüleri kullanılarak retrospektif bir çalışma yapılmıştır. Çalışmamızda bulbus oculi’ye ait sağ ve sol tarafta antero-posterior çap, transvers çap ve yükseklik ölçümleri yapılmıştır.Bulgular: Yaş ortalaması 36,71 olan 110 kadın ve yaş ortalaması 36,79 olan 80 erkek katılımcıda Bulbus oculi AP Çap (Sağ), Bulbus Oculi AP Çap (Sol), Bulbus Oculi Transvers Çap (Sol), Bulbus Oculi Yükseklik (Sağ) ve Bulbus Oculi Yükseklik (Sol) parametreleri arasında anlamlı fark bulunmuştur. Grup I (19-30 yaş), Grup II (31-40 yaş), Grup III (41-50 yaş), Grup IV (51-60 yaş) ve Grup V (61-68 yaş) olmak üzere beş grup arasında Bulbus oculi AP Çap (Sol ) parametresi hariç tüm parametrelerde anlamlı fark elde edilmiştir.Sonuç: Çalışma bulgularının oftalmolojik, okuloplastik ve nörolojik uygulamalar için yararlı olacağını düşünmekteyiz

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Bulbus oculi, çap, magnetik rezonans, yükseklik

Bulbus oculi morphometric analysis and its clinical importance

Purpose: The aim of this study is to emphasize the clinical importance of diameter and height measurements of bulbus oculus.Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was carried out using magnetic resonance images of a total of 190 individuals (19 women aged 80-68 years). In our study, antero-posterior diameter, transverse diameter and height measurements of bulbus oculi were made on the right and left sides.Results: The average age was 36.71 in 110 women participants and the average age was 36.79 in 80 male participants was found a significant difference in Bulbus oculi AP Diameter (Right), Bulbus Oculi AP Diameter (Left), Bulbus Oculi Transverse Diameter (Left), Bulbus Oculi Height (Right) and Bulbus Oculi Height (Left). Between of Group I (19-30 years), Group II (31-40 years), Group III (41-50 years), Group IV (51-60 years) and Group V (61-68 years) was obtained a significant difference in all parameters except Bulbus Oculi AP Diameter (Left) parameter.Conclusion: We believe that the study findings will be useful for ophthalmologic, oculoplastic and neurological applications.

Keywords:

Bulbus oculi, diameter, magnetic resonance,

PDF

___

1. Yücel AH. Dere Anatomi Atlası ve Ders Kitabı. 7. Baskı. Adana, Akademisyen Kitabevi, 2018.
2. Bekerman I, Gottlieb P, Vaiman M. Variations in eyeball diameters of the healthy adults. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014: 503645.
3. Standring S. Gray’s Anatomy. The Anatomical Basis Of Clinical Practice. 40th ed., Churchill livingstone Elsevier Limited: Spain. 2008.
4. Gökmen FG. Sistematik Anatomi. İzmir, Güven Kitabevi, 2008.
5. Arıncı K, Elhan A. Anatomi 2. Cilt, 4. baskı, Ankara, Güneş Kitabevi, 2005.
6. Ozan H. Ozan Anatomi. 3.baskı, Ankara, Klinisyen Tıp Kitapevleri, 2013.
7. Ates I, Yazici O, Ates H, Ozdemir N. Unusual metastases of lung cancer: bulbus oculi and maxillary sinüs. Exp Oncol. 2015;37:231–2.
8. Shields CL, Shields JA, Gross NE, Schwartz GP, Lally SE. Survey of 520 eyes with uveal metastases. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1265–76.
9. Asil K, Gündüz Y, Yaldız C, Aksoy YE. Intraorbital encephalocele presenting with exophthalmos and orbital dystopia: CT and MRG findings. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015;57:58-60.
10. Huang QB, Wang JG, Li XG, Zhou XD, Wang DH, Wang XY. Neurofibromatosis complicated with meningoencephalocele: One case report. Chin Med J. 2007;120:2151-2.
11. Atchison DA, Markwell EL, Kasthurirangan S, Pope JM, Smith G, Swann PG. Age-related changes in optical and biometric characteristics of emmetropic eyes. J Vis. 2008;8:1-20.
12. Lam CS, Goh WS, Tang YK, Tsui KK, Wong WC, Man TC. Changes in refractive trends and optical components of Hong Kong Chinese aged over 40 years. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999;14:383-8.
13. Van Rens GH, Arkell SM. Refractive errors and axial length among Alaskan Eskimos. Acta Ophthalmol. 1991;69:27-32.
14. Kim JM, Kim MS, Jang HJ, Park KH, Caprioli J. The association between retinal vessel diameter and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in asymmetric normal tension glaucoma patients. Inves Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:5609-14.
15. Raboel PH, Bartek JJ, Andresen M, Bellander BM, Romner B. Intracranial pressure monitoring: Invasive versus non-invasive methods-a review. Crit Care Res and Pract. 2012:1-14.
16. Kafadar S, Kafadar H. Bulbus çap ve yükseklik değerlerinin incelenmesi. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018;4:1074-82.
17. Atchison DA, Jones CE, Schmid KL, Pritchard N, Pope JM, Strugnell WE, et al. Eye shape in emmetropia and myopia. Inves Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3380-6.
18. Song HT, Kim YJ, Lee SJ, Moon YS. Relations between age, weight, refractive error and eye shape by computerized tomography in children. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2007;21:163-8.
19. Kang P, Gifford P, McNamara P, Wu J, Yeo S, Vong B et al. Peripheral refraction in different ethnicities. Inves Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6059-65.
20. Ateşoğlu S, Şenol D, Balsak S, Alakuş MF, Özbağ D, Dağ U. An analysis of morphometric qualities of bulbus oculi in cataract patients: acomparative biometric study. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2016;299:1308- 12.
21. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Ng TP, Tielsch JM, Johnson GJ, Seah SK. Variations in ocular biometry in an adult Chinese population in Singapore: The Tanjong Pagar survey. Inves Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:73-80.
22. Özdemir M, Gizir H. Age and gender related biometric changes in normal eyes. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci. 2011;31:1139-44.