Ayşe Karaoğullarından, Ali Vefa Yücetürk

GELENEKSEL TÜRK MÜZİĞİ EĞİTİMİNİN SES ALANI VE SES KALİTESİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; geleneksel Türk müziği eğitiminin ses alanı profili ve ses kalitesi üzerinde klasik müzik eğitimi kadar etkili olup olmadığını araştırmaktır. Yöntemler: Çalışmaya Konservatuar'dan 20 gönüllü ve Türk Müziği Amatör Korosundan 10 gönüllü alındı. 8 aylık ses eğitimi öncesi ve sonrasında deneklerin seslerinin dijital kayıtları alındı. Ses kayıtları Dr. Speech ses analiz programı ile analiz edildi. Ses analizi sonuçları gruplar arasında karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Ses aralığı profili sırasıyla Grup 1'de (29- 32) 3 yarım ton, grup 2'de (30- 32) 2 yarım ton ve grup 3'te (23- 28) 5 yarım ton genişletilmiş bulundu. HNR (harmonic to noise ratio), SNR (signal to noise ratio), NNE (normalized noise energy) gibi sesin harmonik bileşenlerinin parametreleri, ses eğitimi sonrası tüm gruplarda düzeldi. GRBAS skorları, konservatuvar grubunda ses eğitimi öncesi normaldi ve amatör grupta diğer gruplara göre daha belirgin düzeldi. Gruplar arasındaki değişimler karşılaştırıldığında, birinci ve ikinci konservatuvar grupları arasında anlamlı bir farklılık gözlenmezken amatör grup ile birinci ve ikinci konservatuvar grupları arasında yedi parametrede (amplitüd tremor, HNR, SNR, NNE ve GRBAS) anlamlı farklılıklar izlendi. Sonuç: Bu çalışma geleneksel Türk müziği eğitiminin ses alanı ve ses kalitesi üzerindeki etkilerini inceleyen ilk çalışmadır. Araştırmamız, geleneksel Türk müziği eğitiminin, ses alanı ve ses kalitesi üzerinde klasik müzik kadar etkili olduğunu göstermektedir.

EFFECTS OF TRADITIONAL TURKISH MUSIC EDUCATION ON VOICE RANGE PROFILE AND VOICE QUALITY

Aim: The aim of this study; to investigate whether traditional Turkish music education is as effective on voice range profile and voice quality as classical music education. Methods: Twenty volunteers in the Conservatory and 10 volunteers the Turkish Amateur Music Choir were included in the study. Digital recordings of the subjects’ voices were obtained before and after 8 months of voice training. Voice recordings were analyzed with the Dr. Speech voice analysis program. Voice analysis results were compared between groups. Results: Voice range profile was found expanded as 3, 2, and 5 semitones in group 1 (29 to 32 semitones), group 2 (30 to 32 semitones) and group 3 (23 to 28 semitones), respectively. The parameters of harmonic component of voice such as HNR, SNR, and NNE improved in all groups after voice training. GRBAS scores were normal in the conservatory group before training and improved following training in all groups, with the amateur group being the most obvious. When the alterations were compared between the groups, no significant differences were observed between the first and second conservatory groups, whereas a significant difference was observed between the amateur group and the first and second conservatory groups in seven parameters (amplitude tremor, HNR, SNR, NNE and GRBAS). Conclusions: This is the first study about the effects of traditional Turkish music education on subjective and objective parameters of the singing voice. Our research shows that traditional Turkish music education improved the singing voice improvements as much as with classical music.

PDF

___

1. Wendler J. Singing and science. Invited lecture at the 7th Pan-European voice conference (PEVOC7), Groningen, August 28 to September 1, 2007. Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP).2008;60(6), 279–87. doi: 10.1159/000170076
2. Dos Santos P, Vieira MN, Sansão J, et al. Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.2019;33(2):220–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.10.020
3. Nowosielska-Grygiel J, Olszewski J. The usefulness of the acoustic and the capacity analysis of singing voice. Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology. 2019;73(3): 16–25. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.1534
4. Ma EP, Yiu E. M. Multiparametric evaluation of dysphonic severity. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation. 2006;20(3): 380–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.04.007
5. Brown WS, Jr Rothman HB, Sapienza CM. Perceptual and acoustic study of professionally trained versus untrained voices. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation. 2000;14(3):301–9. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(00)80076-4
6. Svec JG, Sundberg J, Hertegård S. Three registers in an untrained female singer analyzed by videokymography, strobolaryngoscopy and sound spectrography. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2008;123(1):347–53. doi: 10.1121/1.2804939
7. Van Lierde KM, D'haeseleer E, Baudonck N, et al. The impact of vocal warm-up exercises on the objective vocal quality in female students training to be speech language pathologists. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation. 2011;25(3):e115–e121. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.11.004
8. Costicova ND. Gagauz’s Trıo “Oglan” As The Brıghtest Example Of Gagauzıan Musıc Culture . İnönü University Culture and Art Journal . 2017;3(1):187-97. doi: 10.22252/ijca.337024
9. Sielska-Badurek EM, Sobol M, Olszowska K, et al. Contemporary Commercial Music Singing Students-Voice Quality and Vocal Function at the Beginning of Singing Training. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation. 2018;32(6): 668–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.08.027
10. Brown WS, Jr Rothman HB, Sapienza CM. Perceptual and acoustic study of professionally trained versus untrained voices. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation. 2000;14(3):301–9. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(00)80076-4
11. Timmermans B, De Bodt MS, Wuyts FL, et al. Training outcome in future professional voice users after 18 months of voice training. Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica: official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP). 2004;56(2):120–9. doi: 10.1159/000076063
12. Van Lierde KM, D'haeseleer E, Baudonck N, et al. The impact of vocal warm-up exercises on the objective vocal quality in female students training to be speech language pathologists. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation. 2011;25(3):e115–e121. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.11.004
13. Lundy, D. S., Roy, S., Casiano, R. R., et al. JAcoustic analysis of the singing and speaking voice in singing students. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.2000;14(4): 490–493. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(00)80006-5
14. Heuillet-Martin G, Danoy MC, Florentin L, et all. Voir le "timbre" en voix chantée: éducation et rééducation [Seeing the timbre in the singing voice: training and retraining]. Revue de laryngologie - otologie – rhinologie. 1990;111(4):365–70.
15. Siupsinskiene NL. Effects of vocal training on singing and speaking voice characteristics in vocally healthy adults and children based on choral and nonchoral data. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation. 2011;25(4):e177–e189. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.03.010