Fernando Almeida

1714

The Role of Serious Games, Gamification and Industry 4.0 Tools in the Education 4.0 Paradigm

The Role of Serious Games, Gamification and Industry 4.0 Tools in the Education 4.0 Paradigm

Education 4.0 is a new educational paradigm that intends to address the needs andpotentialities of the fourth industrial revolution. Education 4.0 builds on the concept oflearning by doing, in which students are encouraged to learn and discover different thingsin singular ways based on experimentation. This study intends to analyze the role ofemerging technologies like serious games and industry 4.0 in the transformation ofeducation 4.0 in higher education. A qualitative methodology was employed based on 25case studies of innovative projects in Portuguese higher education institutions. Theresults indicate a residual adoption of serious games and gamification approaches onlyappear in less than 20% of the projects. It was also possible to identify that most projectsinvolve several stakeholders such as teachers, students and university managers, andtypically involve multidisciplinary competencies fields. The main benefits brought to theeducation context include greater involvement of students in projects, development oftheir skills and its application in a real context. On the other hand, the main challengesare the simplification of the real world made by these applications, the difficultiesinherent to their inclusion in the didactical system and the limited capacities to offergreater interactivity without predefined external stimuli.
PDF

___

  • Alsawaier, R. (2018). The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(1), 56-79.
  • Bahadoorsingh, S., Dyer, R., & Sharama, C. (2016). Integrating serious games into the engineering curriculum - a game-based learning approach to power systems analysis. International Journal of Computational Vision and Robotics, 6(3), 276-289.
  • Barker, J. & Gossman, P. (2013). The learning impact of a virtual learning environment: students’ views. Teacher Education Advancement, 5(2), 19-38.
  • Bartolomé, A., Castañeda, L., & Adell, J. (2018). Personalisation in educational technology: The absence of underlying pedagogies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(14), 1-17.
  • Bellotti, F., Berta, R., & De Gloria, A. (2010). Design effective serious games: Opportunities and challenges for research. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 5, 22-35.
  • Bellotti, F., Kapralos, B., Lee, K., Moreno-Ger, P., & Berta, R. (2013). Assessment in and of serious games: An overview. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, Article ID 136864, 1-11.
  • Blackstone, A. (2012). Principles of sociological inquiry: qualitative and quantitative methods. Retrieved on 10 December 2018 from https://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/ sociologicalinquiry-principles-qualitative-and-quantitative-methods/index.html
  • Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Lund, S., Dahlström, P., Wiesinger, A., & Subramaniam, A. (2018). Skill Shift: Automation and the Future of the Workforce. McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved on 10 December 2018 from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Featured% 20Insights/Future%20of%20Organizations/Skill%20shift%20Automation%20and%20the %20future%20of%20the%20workforce/MGI-Skill-Shift-Automation-and-future-of-theworkforce-May-2018.ashx
  • Burner, T. (2018). Why is educational change so difficult and how can we make it more effective? Forskning og forandring, 1(1), 122-134.
  • Cheng, M., Chen, J., Chu, S., & Chen, S. (2015). The use of serious games in science education: A review of selected empirical research from 2002 to 2013. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(3), 353-375.
  • Chong, S., Pan, G., Chin, J., Show, P., Yang, T., & Huang, C. (2018). Integration of 3D printing and Industry 4.0 into engineering teaching. Sustainability, 10, 1-13.
  • Demartini, C. & Benussi, L. (2017). Do Web 4.0 and Industry 4.0 imply Education X.0? IT Pro, May/June, 4-7.
  • Demian, P. & Morrice, J. (2012). The use of virtual learning environments and their impact on academic performance. Engineering Education, 7(1), 11-19.
  • Dicheva, D., Dichev C., Agre G., & Angelova G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75-88.
  • Gros, B. (2016). The design of smart education environments. Smart Learning Environments, 3(15), 1-11.
  • Hariharasudan, A. & Kot, S. (2018). A scoping review on digital English and Education 4.0 for Industry 4.0. Social Sciences, 7, 1-13.
  • Hayati, D. & Hashemy, A. (2013). Communication technologies and virtual learning environment (VLE) in teaching literature. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 4(2), 181-184.
  • Hussin, A. (2018). Education 4.0 made simple: Ideas for teaching. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92-98.
  • Ibarra, D., Ganzarain, J., & Igartua, J. (2018). Business model innovation through Industry 4.0: A review. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 4-10.
  • Islam, I. (2018). Automation and the future of employment: Implications for India. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 5(2), 234-243.
  • Kara, N. & Sevim, N. (2013). Adaptive learning systems: Beyond teaching machines. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(2), 108-120.
  • Khaleel, F., Ashaari, N., Wook, T., & Ismail, A. (2016). Gamification elements for learning applications. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 6(6), 868-874.
  • Kinshuk (2016). Designing adaptive and personalized learning environments (Interdisciplinary approaches to educational technology). Arbingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • Laamarti, F., Eid, M., & Saddik, A. (2014). An overview of serious games. International Journal of Computer Games Technology, Article ID 358152, 1-15.
  • Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E., & Ramos, L. (2017). Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 - A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3609-3629.
  • Lonkaew. K. (2016). When Thailand 4.0 was driven by Education 2.0. Saan-Punya, 26, 92-97.
  • Martín-Gutíerrez, J., Mora, C., Añorbe-Díaz, B., & González-Marrero, A. (2017). Virtual technologies trends in education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 469-486.
  • Martinaitis, Z. (2014). Measuring skills in Europe. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(3), 198-210.
  • Murray, M. & Pérez, J. (2015). Informing and performing: A study comparing adaptive learning to traditional learning. Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 18, 111-125.
  • Papanastasiou, G., Drigas, A., Skianis, C., & Lytras, M. (2017). Serious games in K-12 education: Benefits and impacts on students with attention, memory and developmental disabilities. Program, 51(4), 424-440.
  • Popenici, S. & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(22), 1-13.
  • Puncreobutr, V. (2016). Education 4.0: New challenge of learning. St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 92-97.
  • Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitation of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9), 369-387.
  • Richert, A., Plumanns, L., Gross, K., Schuster, K., & Jeschke, S. (2015). Learning 4.0: Virtual immersive engineering education. Digital Universities: International Best Practices and Applications, 2, 51-66.
  • Rojko, A. (2017). Industry 4.0 concept: Background and overview. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 11(5), 77-90.
  • Sailer, M., Hense, J., Mayr, S., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371-380.
  • Schönsleben, P., Fontana, F., & Duchi, A. (2017). What benefits do initiatives such as Industry 4.0 offer for production locations in high-wage countries? Procedia CIRP, 63, 179-183.
  • Sera, L. & Wheeler, E. (2017). Game on: The gamification of the pharmacy classroom. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9, 155-159.
  • Shahroom, A. & Hussin, N. (2018). Industrial revolution 4.0 and education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 314-319.
  • Shi, Y. & Shih, J. (2015). Game factors and game-based learning design model. International Journal of Computer Games Technology, Article ID 549684, 1-11.
  • Simões, J., Redondo, R., & Vilas, A. (2013). A social gamification framework for a k-6 learning platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 345-353.
  • Slimani, A., Yedri, O, Elouaai, F., & Bouhorma, M. (2016). Towards a design approach for serious games. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 11(1), 58-81.
  • Sung, Y., Cho, S., Um, K., Jeong, Y., Fong, S., & Cho, K. (2013). Human-robot interaction learning using demonstration-based learning and Q-Learning in a pervasive sensing environment. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 1, 1-8.
  • Tsekleves, E., Cosmas, J., & Aggoun, A. (2016). Benefits, barriers and guideline recommendations for the implementation of serious games in education for stakeholders and policymakers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 164- 183.
  • Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2017). The effect of games and simulation on higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(22), 1-33.
  • Xing, B. & Marwala, T. (2017). Implications of the fourth industrial age for higher education. Thinker: For the Thought Leaders, 73, 10-15.
  • Zhu, Z., Yu, M., & Riezebos, P. (2016). A research framework of smart education. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 1-17.
  • Zichermann, G. & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design. Implementing game mechanics in Web and mobile apps. Sebastopol, California: O’Reilly.
  • Zimmer, T. (2014). Rethinking higher education: A case for adaptive learning. Forbes Education. Retrieved on 10 December 2018 from http://www.forbes.com/sites/ccap/2014/10/22/ rethinking-higher-ed-a-case-for-adaptive-learning/
Contemporary Educational Technology-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 2010
  • Yayıncı: Prof. Dr. Ali Şimşek
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Effects of Augmented Reality in Teaching Old Turkish Language Mementoes on Student Achievement and Motivation

Mehmet Fatih ÖZCAN, Nurullah ŞAHİN

Exploring the Loneliness and Internet Addiction Level of College Students Based on Demographic Variables

Neşe Sevim ÇIRAK, Osman EROL

The Role of Serious Games, Gamification and Industry 4.0 Tools in the Education 4.0 Paradigm

Fernando Almeida

Computational Thinking, Programming Self-Efficacy, Problem Solving and Experiences in the Programming Process Conducted with Robotic Activities

Hatice Yıldız DURAK, Ramazan YILMAZ, Fatma Gizem KARAOĞLAN YILMAZ

Pre-service Information Technology Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, SelfEsteem and Attitudes towards Teaching: A Four-Year Longitudinal Study

Özcan Özgür DURSUN

A Comparative Study on Social Media Addiction of High School and University Students

Ali Şimşek, Kemal Elciyar