___

• Alessi, S. M. & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
• Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project, 31. Retrieved on 24 December 2018 from www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
• Bando, T., Iijima, A., & Yano, S. (2012). Visual fatigue caused by stereoscopic images and the search for the requirement to prevent them: A review. Displays, 33, 76-83.
• Barfield, W. & Rosenberg, C. (1995). Judgments of azimuth and elevation as a function of monoscopic and binocular depth cues using a perspective display. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 173-181.
• Bush, M. D. (2007). Facilitating the integration of culture and vocabulary learning: The categorization and use of pictures in the classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 40(4), 727-745.
• Chun, D. M. & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotation on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183-198.
• Cid, X. C. & Lopez, R. E. (2010). The impact of stereo display on student understanding of phases of the moon. Astronomy Education Review, 9(1), DOI: 10.3847/AER2009044.
• Cliburn, D. & Krantz, J. (2008). Towards an effective low-cost virtual reality display system for education. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 23(3), 147-153.
• Drascic, D. (1991). Skill acquisition and task performance in teleoperation using monoscopic and stereoscopic video remote viewing. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 35(19). San Francisco, CA: Sage.
• Dwyer, F. M. (1969). An experimental analysis of the use of realism in illustrations used to complement programmed instruction. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 6, 147-153.
• Ferdig, R., Blank, J., Kratcoski, A., & Clements, R. (2015). Using stereoscopy to teach complex biological concepts. Advances in Physiology Education, 39(3), 205-208.
• Hannafin, M. J. & Hooper, S. R. (1993). Learning principles. In M. L. Fleming & W. H. Levie (Eds.), Instructional Message Design: Principles from the Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences (2nd ed.), pp. 191-227. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
• Hansen, J. A., Barnett, M., MaKinster, J. G., & Keating, T. (2004). The impact of three‐ dimensional computational modeling on student understanding of astronomical concepts: A quantitative analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1365-1378.
• Keebler, J. R. (2011). Effects of 3D stereoscopy, visuo-spatial working memory, and perceptions of simulation experience on the memorization of confusable objects (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.
• Kim, D. & Gilman, D. A. (2008). Effects of text, audio, and graphic aids in multimedia instruction for vocabulary learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 114-126.
• Kim, D., Yoo, J., & Seo, Y. (2013). Qualitative analysis of individual and composite content factors of stereoscopic 3D video causing visual discomfort. Displays, 34(3), 223-240.
• Lewis, L. A., Zaritsky, E., Heinrichs, W. L., & Nezhat, C. (2006). Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 107(4), 78S.
• Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(2), 225-244.
• Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225–236.
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Mayer, R. E. & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389-401.
• McGraw, T. M. (2004). The effects of two-dimensional stimuli and three-dimensional stereoptic stimuli on spatial representation in drawings. Studies in Art Education, 45(2), 153-169.
• McIntire, J. P., Havig, P. R., & Geiselman, E. E. (2014). Stereoscopic 3D displays and human performance: A comprehensive review. Displays, 35, 18-26.
• Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems, 14(4), 459-466.
• Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Price, C. A., Lee, H. S., & Malatesta, K. (2014). Stereoscopy in static scientific imagery in an informal education setting: Does it matter? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 721-734.
• Price, C. A., Lee, H. S., Subbarao, M., Kasal, E., & Aguilera, J. (2015). Comparing short‐ and long‐ term learning effects between stereoscopic and two‐dimensional film at a planetarium. Science Education, 99(6), 1118-1142.
• Rule, A. C., Barrera, M. T., & Steward, R. A. (2004). Using descriptive adjective object boxes to improve science vocabulary. Montessori LIFE, Spring, 28-33.
• Sato, T. & Suzuki, A. (2010). Do multimedia-oriented visual glosses really facilitate EFL vocabulary learning? A comparison of planar images with three-dimensional images. Asian EFL Journal, 12(4), 160-172.
• Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.
• Tavanti, M. & Lind, M. (2001). 2D vs. 3D: Implications on spatial memory. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, INFOVIS’01 (pp. 139-145). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.
• Wen, G., Chang, H. C., Reinhold, J., Lo, J. Y., & Markey, M. K. (2018). Virtual assessment of stereoscopic viewing of digital breast tomosynthesis projection images. Journal of Medical Imaging, 5(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.015501
• Wuerzburger, J. (2017). The impact of stereoscopic three-dimensional learning strategy on undergraduate technology students' procedural learning in information technology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Indiana, USA.
• Yeh, Y. & Wang, C.-W. (2003). Effects of multimedia vocabulary annotations and learning styles on vocabulary learning. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 131-144.