The Design of a Cognitive Apprenticeship to Facilitate Storytime Programming for Librarians

The Design of a Cognitive Apprenticeship to Facilitate Storytime Programming for Librarians

The majority of research that has been conducted on structuring mentorship programs has been on career support in terms of transferring tacit and explicit knowledge from the supervisor to the protégé. While the instructional design literature touts that cognitive apprenticeships provide a great framework for constructivist and situated learning environments, little research has been done examining how much time should be allocated to the various phases of the apprenticeship framework. The purpose of this study was to explore whether the use of a cognitive apprenticeship framework could be used to mentor new librarians. Data was collected and analyzed in three phases. Phase 1 consisted of a needs assessment to determine the skills necessary for programmers to deliver a curriculum based storytime. Phase 2 data collected during the implementation of the cognitive apprenticeship included observation and reflective journals. Data collected during Phase 3 consisted of participant interviews immediately following the implementation of the cognitive apprenticeship, and three months after the conclusion of the study. All data was coded and analyzed using a phenemonological approach. The researchers found the need for flexibility when utilizing a cognitive apprenticeship model, based on participant prior knowledge and experience, the importance of the modeling and coaching stages of the model, participant desire for working with other programmers being trained

___

  • Block, P. (2011). Flawless consulting: A guide to getting your expertise used (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Pfeiffer.
  • Alger, C., & Kopcha, T. J. (2011). Technology supported cognitive apprenticeship transforms the student teaching field experience: Improving the student teaching field experience for all triad members. The Teacher Educator, 46, 71-88.
  • Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
  • Block, P. (2011). Flawless Consulting: A guide to getting your expertise used (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
  • Bouta, H., & Paraskeva, F. (2013). The cognitive apprenticeship theory for the teaching of mathematics in an online 3D virtual environment. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 44(2), 159-178.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
  • Collins, A., Bown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1987). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 1-18.
  • Collins, A., Hawkins, J., & Carver, S. M. (1991). A cognitive apprenticeship for disadvantaged students. In B. Means, C. Chelemer, & M. S. Knapp (Eds.), Teaching advanced skills to at-risk students (pp. 216-243). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Delattre, M., Ocler, R., Moulette, P., & Rymeyko, K. (2009). Singularity of qualitative research: From collecting information to producing results. Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science, 73(3), 33-50.
  • Dennen, V. P. & Bruner, K. J. (2007). Cognitive apprenticeship in educational practice: Research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies. In D. H. Jonassen, M. J. Spector, M. Driscoll, M. D. Merrill, & J. van Merrienboer (Eds.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 426-437). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Dickey, M. D. (2008). Integrating cognitive apprenticeship methods in a web-based educational technology course for P-12 teacher education. Computers & Education, 51, 506-518.
  • Gilley, A., Gilley, J. W., & Kouider, E. (2010). Characteristics of managerial coaching. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 23(1), 53-70. doi:10.1002/piq.20075
  • Higgins, M. M. & Kram, K. E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 264-288.
  • McLellan, H. (1994). Situated learning: Continuing the conversation. Educational Technology, 34(10), 7-8.
  • Newby, T. J. & Heide, A. (1992). The value of mentoring. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(4), 2-15. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.1992.tb00562.x
  • Raabe, B. & Beehr, T. A. (2003). Formal mentoring versus supervisor and coworker relationships: Differences in perceptions and impact. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 271-293. doi:10.1002/job.193
  • Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
  • Stewart, K. K. & Lagowski, J. J. (2003). Cognitive apprenticeship theory and graduate chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(12), 1362-1367.
  • Swap, W., Leonard, D., Shields, M., & Abrams, L. (2001). Using mentoring and storytelling to transfer knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 95-114.
  • Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Willig. C. (2008). Introducting qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, England: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.