Effects of Inquiry Types on States Related to Community of Inquiry in Online Learning Environments: An Explanatory Case Study

Effects of Inquiry Types on States Related to Community of Inquiry in Online Learning Environments: An Explanatory Case Study

The purpose of this study, with reference to Community of Inquiry, is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of Learning activities based on Online Inquiry differentiating as Open and Guided Inquiries. This study employs mixed research method and explanatory design. The data were collected with the Community of Inquiry Index and the Student Process Survey. According to the Community of Inquiry index results, scores of all guided inquiry students in terms of the scale were higher at a statistically significant level than those of open group. Similarly, regarding the subscales of community of inquiry index teaching presence and cognitive presence factor scores were higher in favor of the guided inquiry students. There is no significant difference between the social presence scores of the groups. Obtained qualitative data also support this result. According to these findings, we can arrive at the conclusion that, within the scope of Community of Inquiry, the students in the guided inquiry group had a more efficient working process than the students in the open inquiry group.

___

  • Akyol, Z., et al. (2009). Response to the review of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 123-136.
  • Altunsoy, S. (2008). Ortaöğretim biyoloji ogretiminde arastirmaya dayalı ogrenme yaklasiminin ogrencilerin bilimsel surec becerilerine, akademik basarilarina ve tutumlarina etkisi (Unpublished master's thesis). Secuk University, Konya.
  • Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-lnnes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing community of inquiry instrument: Testing measure of the community of inquiry framework using multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3), 133--136.
  • Arslan, A. (2007). Fen egitiminde arastirmaya dayali ogretim yonteminin kavramsal ogrenmeye etkisi (Unpublished master's thesis). Marmara University, lstanbul.
  • Buyukozturk, S., Akgun, O. E., Ozkahveci, O., Demirel, F. (2004). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational Sciences: Theory Practice, 4(2), 231--237.
  • Buyukozturk, S. (2010). Sosyal bilimler icin veri analiziel kitabi (20 th ed.). Ankara:Pegem A.Coll, C., Rochera, MJ. Gispert, I. (2014). Supporting online collaborative learning in small groups: Teacher feedback on learning content, academic task and social participation. Computers Education, 75, 53--64.
  • Caliskan, H. (2008). Ilkogretim 7. sinifsosyal bilgiler dersinde arastirmaya dayali ogrenme yak/asiminin derse yonelik tutuma, basariya ve kalici/ik duzeyine etkisi Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gazi University, Ankara.
  • Duban, N. (2008). Ilkogretim fen ve teknoloji dersinin sorgulamaya dayali ogrenme yaklasimina gore islenmesi: Bir eylem arastirmasi. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Anadolu University, Eskisehir.
  • Freankel, J.R. Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. (7th. ed.). New York: McGraw--Hill.
  • Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal ofAsynchronous Learning Networks,11(1), 61--72.
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in text--based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87-- 105.
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 5--9.
  • Garrison, D. R. Akyol, Z. (2015). Toward the development of metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 66--71.
  • Jansen, B. A. (2011). Inquiry Unpacked: An Introduction to Inquiry-Based Learning. Library Media Connection, 29(5), 10--12.
  • Kent, C., Laslo, E., Rafaeli, S. (2016). Interactivity in online discussions and learning outcomes. Computers Education, 97, 116--128.
  • Kovanovic', V., Gasevic, D., Joksimovic, S., Hatala, M., Adesope, O. (2015). Analytics of communities of inquiry: Effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 74--89.
  • Kozan, K. (2016). The incremental predictive validity of teaching, cognitive and social presence on cognitive load. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 11--19.
  • Kula, S.G. (2009). Arastirmaya dayali fen ogrenmenin ogrencilerin bilimsel surec becerileri, basarilari, kavram ogrenme/eri ve tutumlarina etkisi (Unpublished master's thesis). Marmara University, lstanbul.
  • Lim, B. R. (2001). Guidelines for designing inquiry-based learning on the Web: Online professional development of educators (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.
  • Lim, J. Richardson, J. C. (2016). Exploring the effects of students' social networking experience on social presence and perceptions of using SNSs for educational purposes. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 31--39.Ma, J., Han, X.,
  • Yang, J., Cheng, J. (2015). Examining the necessary condition for engagement in an online learning environment based on learning analytics approach: The role of the instructor. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 26--34.
  • Morueta, R. T., Lopez, P. M., Gomez, A. H., Harris, V. W. (2016). Exploring social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry to perform higher cognitive tasks. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 122--131.
  • Oliveira, |., Tinoca, L. Pereira, A. (2011). Online group work patterns: How to promote successful collaboration. Computers Education, 57, 1348--1357.
  • Ozturk, E. (2012). Arastirma toplulugu olceginin Turkceye uyralanmasi: Geçerlik ve guvenirlik calismasi. Ilkogretim Online, 11(2), 408-422.
  • Quintana, C., Zhang, M., Krajcik, J. (2005). framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software--based scaffolding. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 235-244.
  • Remesal, A. Colomina, R. (2013). Social presence and online collaborative small group work: socioconstructivist account. Computers Education, 60, 357-367.
  • Scott, K. S., Sorokti, K. H., Merrell, J. D. (2016). Learning "beyond the classroom" within an enterprise social network system. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 75--90.
  • Shaw, R.S. (2013). The relationships among group size, participation, and performance of programming language learning supported with online forums. Computers Education, 62, 196--207.
  • Shea, P. et al. (2010). re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: Social network and content analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 10--21.
  • Shea, P. Bidjerano, T. (2012). Learning presence as moderator in the community of inquiry model. Computers Education, 59(2), 316--326.
  • Shea, P., Hayes, S., Uzuner--Smith, S., Gozza--Cohen, M., Vickers, J., Bidjerano, T. (2014).
  • Reconceptualizing the community of inquiry framework: An exploratory analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 9--17.
  • Szeto, E. (2015). Community of Inquiry as an instructional approach: What effects of teaching, social and cognitive presences are there in blended synchronous learning and teaching?. Computers Education, 81, 191--201.
  • Tatar, N. (2006). Ilkogretim fen egitiminde arastirmaya dayali ogrenme yaklasiminin bilimsel surec becerilerine, akademik basariya ve tutuma etkisi. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gazi University, Ankara.
  • Turel, Y. K. (2016). Relationships between students' perceived team learning experiences, team performances, and social abilities in blended course setting. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 79--86.
  • Wisneski, J. E., Ozogul, G., Bichelmeyer, B. A. (2015). Does teaching presence transfer between MBA teaching environments? comparative investigation of instructional design practices associated with teaching presence. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 18--27.
  • Yang, J. C., Quadir, B., Chen, N. S., Miao, Q. (2016). Effects of online presence on learning performance in blog--based online course. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 11-- 20.Yang, S. H. (2016). Conceptualizing effective feedback practice through an online community of inquiry. Computers Education, 94, 162-177.
  • Yurdakul, B. (2005). YapllandlrmaCIllk. In Ö. Dmirel (Ed.), Egitimde yeni yonelim/er (pp. 38-66). Ankara: Pegem A.
  • Zhang, M., Quintana, C. (2012). Scaffolding strategies for supporting middle school students' online inquiry processes. Computers Education, 58(1), 181--196.
  • Zydney, J. M., deNoyeIIes, A., Seo, K. K.--J. (2012). Creating community of inquiry in online environments: An exploratory study on the effect of protocol on interactions within asynchronous discussions. Computers Education, 58(1), 77--87.