Effects of Collaborative Learning Styles on Performance of Students in a Ubiquitous Collaborative Mobile Learning Environment

Effects of Collaborative Learning Styles on Performance of Students in a Ubiquitous Collaborative Mobile Learning Environment

Collaborative learning is an approach employed by instructors to facilitate learning and improve learner’s performance. Mobile learning can accommodate a variety of learning approaches. This study, therefore, investigated the effects of collaborative learning styles on performance of students in a mobile learning environment. The specific purposes of this study are to: examine the difference in the performance of students in mobile learning platform; examine the difference in performance of students in the five collaborative learning styles; examine the significant difference in performance between collaborative and non-collaborative learning styles; and determine the effect of collaborative learning style on student’s performance in a mobile learning platform. Purposive sampling technique was used to choose 36 secondary school students as the sample. The study adopted a pretest-posttest experimental approach and subjects were randomly assigned into the five collaborative and one non-collaborative learning group. The groups were exposed to mobile learning on the mole concept (MLMC) in Chemistry. The results showed that there was significant gains regarding the difference between pretest and posttest scores of students in the mobile learning experience, and think-aloud-pair problem-solving technique is the most effective collaborative learning style. Also, all the collaborative learning styles are more effective for learning in a mobile learning environment compared to non-collaborative learning style.

___

  • Adan-Coello, J. M., Tobar, C. M., Faria E. S. J., Menezes, W. S, & Freitas, R. L. (2011). Forming groups for collaborative learning of introductory computer programming based on students’ programming skills and learning styles. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 7(4), 34-46.
  • Ally, M. (2009). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training. Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.
  • Arnedillo- Sánchez, I., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Milrad, M., Sharples, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Innovation in mobile learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(1), 13–35.
  • Chatti, M. A., Hamdan, N. A., & Schaper, H. (2012). Collaboration in mobile learning seminar. Proceedings of the Mobile Learning Computer-Supported Learning Research Group Conference (CALRG 2011). The Open University, United Kingdom.
  • Chen, Y., Kao, T., & Sheu, J. (2003). A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 347-359.
  • Clark, Q. (2011). Designing mlearning: Tapping into the mobile revolution for organizational performance. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
  • Clough, G., Jones, A. C., McAndrew, P., & Scanlon, E. (2008). Informal learning with PDAs and smartphones. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 359-371
  • Cronje, J. C. & El-Hussein, M. O. M. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the higher education landscape. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 12–21.
  • DiGiano, C., Yarnall, L., Patton, C, Roschelle, J, Tatar, D & Manley, M. (2003). Conceptual tools for planning for the wireless classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 284-297.
  • eLearning Guild. (2007). 360 mobile learning research reports. Santa Rosa: CA.
  • Fuxin, A. Y. (2012). Mobile/smart phone use in higher education. Retrieved on 30 June 2017 from http://swdsi.org/swdsi2012/proceedings_2012/papers/Papers/PA144.pdf
  • Goh, T. & Kinshuk, (2006). Getting ready for mobile learning -- adaptation perspective. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15(2), 175-198.
  • Hsi, H. (2003). A study of user experiences mediated by nomadic web content in a museum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19 (3), 308-319.
  • Huang, H. W., Wu, C. W., & Chen, N. S. (2012). The effectiveness of using procedural scaffoldings in a paper-plus smartphone collaborative learning context. Computer & Education, 59(2), 250-259.
  • Jain, M., Birnholtz, J. Cutrell, E. & Balakrishnan, R. (2011). Exploring display techniques for mobile collaborative learning in developing regions. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. Stockholm: ACM Press.
  • Keegan, D. (2005). Mobile learning: The next generation of learning. Distance Education International. Retrieved on 15 February 2015 from learning.ericsson.net
  • Kopler, E. (2009). Augmented learning: Research and design of mobile educational games. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Koole, M. L. (2009). A model for framing mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning: transforming the delivery of education and training. Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University Press.
  • Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2010). Mobile learning as a catalyst for change. Open learning. The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 25(3), 181-185.
  • Laal, M. & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: What is it? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2012) 491-49
  • Liu, C.-C. & Milrad, M. (2010). Guest editorial – one-to-one learning in the mobile and ubiquitous computing age. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 1-3.
  • Liu, C. C., Tao, S. Y., & Nee, J. Y. (2008). Bridging the gap between students and computers: supporting activity awareness for network collaborative learning with GSM network. Behaviour and Information Technology, 27(2), 127-137.
  • Pachler, N., Bachmair, B., & Cook, J. (2009). Mobile learning: structures, agency, practices. New York: Springer.
  • Reis, J. C., Bonacin, R. & Martins, M. C. (2009). Developing informal education through mobilecollaborative learning. Proceeding of the 12th IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education (CATE’09) (pp.1-7). St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands.
  • Rosen, L. D. (2010). Understanding the igeneration and the way they learn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Smordal, O. & J. Gregory. (2003). Personal digital assistants in medical education and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 320-29.
  • Traxler, J. (2009). Learning in a mobile age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(1), 1-12.
  • Turner, N (2012). What is mlearning? Retrieved on 20 March 2013 from http://aurionlearning. files.wordpress.com/2012/03/mobile-devices1.jpg
  • Vosloo, S. (Ed.). (2012). Mobile learning. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
  • Vavoula, G., Sharples, M., Rudman, P., Meek, J., & Lonsdale, P. (2009). Myartspace: Design and evaluation of support for learning with multimedia phones between classrooms and museums. Computers & Education, 53(2), 286-299.
  • Vogel, B., Spikol, D., Kurti, A., & Milrad, M. (2010). Integrating mobile, web, and sensory technologies to support inquiry-based science learning. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education (pp.65-72). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
  • Wagner, E. D. (2 005). Enabling mobile learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 40(3), 4 0-53.
  • Wang, S. L. & Hwang, G. J. (2012). The role of collective efficacy, cognitive quality, and task cohesion in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Computers & Education, 58(2), 679-687.