Osman Solmaz

148

A Critical Review of Research on Social Networking Sites in Language Teaching and Learning

A Critical Review of Research on Social Networking Sites in Language Teaching and Learning

The current study aims to present a critical analysis of research on social networking sites(SNSs) in second language teaching and learning (L2TL) context. Twenty-two studiespublished from 2011 to 2017 were included in the analysis through the selection criteriadevised by the researcher. The descriptive analysis reveals that Facebook was the mostcommonly explored medium, and more than half of the studies featured English languagelearners in various levels. Following the content analysis of the studies, the emergingaspects of the literature review are treated under five overarching themes: practicingmultiple language areas and literacies; authenticity and negotiation of meaning throughinteraction; development of intercultural competence and socio-pragmatic awareness;membership in L2 communities; and (re)construction of identities. Following an account ofpedagogical considerations such as the dynamics of classroom, technical features, andvarious cultural uses of the SNSs, the study concludes with suggestions and directions forfuture research in regards to the incorporation of SNSs such as Facebook and Twitter intoL2 classrooms.
PDF

___

  • *Blattner, G. & Fiori, M. (2011). Virtual social network communities: An investigation of language learners' development of socio-pragmatic awareness and multiliteracy skills. CALICO Journal, 29(1), 24-43.
  • *Blattner, G. & Lomicka, L. (2012). Facebook-ing and the social generation: A new era of language learning. ALSIC 15(1). Retrived on 15 November 2017 from https://journals.openedition.org/alsic/2413
  • *Chen, H. (2013). Identity practices of multilingual writers in social networking spaces. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 143-170.
  • *DePew, K. E. (2011). Social Media at Academia’s Periphery: Studying Multilingual Developmental Writers’ Facebook Composing Strategies. The Reading Matrix, 11(1), 54-75.
  • *Dizon, G. (2016). A comparative study of Facebook vs. paper-and-pencil writing to improve L2 writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1249-1258.
  • Donath, J., & Boyd, d. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71– 82.
  • Facebook (2018). Facebook newsroom. Retrieved on 7 May 2018 from http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/
  • *Fouz-González, J. (2017). Pronunciation instruction through Twitter: the case of commonly mispronounced words. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 631-663.
  • Glesne, C. (2010). Becoming qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • *Harting, A. (2017). Using Facebook to improve L2 German students’ socio-pragmatic skills. The EUROCALL Review, 25(1), 26-35.
  • *Hattem, D. (2014). Microblogging activities: Language play and tool transformation. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 151-174.
  • Hattem, D. & Lomicka, L. (2016). What the Tweets say: A critical analysis of Twitter research in language learning from 2009 to 2016. E-Learning and Digital Media, 13(1), 5-23.
  • *Jin, S. (2015). Using Facebook to promote Korean EFL learners’ intercultural competence. Language Learning & Technology, 19(3), 38-51.
  • Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2008). Network-based language teaching. In DeusenScholl & Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopledia of language and education, 2nd Edition, Vol4: Second and foreign language education (pp. 281-292). New York: Springer.
  • *Klimanova, L. & Dembovskaya, S. (2013). L2 Identity, Discourse, and Social Networking in Russian. Language Learning & Technology, 17(1), 69-88.
  • *Liu, S. H. (2017). Text-based negotiated interaction of NNS-NNS and NNS-NS dyads on Facebook. ReCALL, 29(3), 294-312.
  • *Lomicka, L. & Lord, G. (2012). A tale of tweets: Analyzing microblogging among language learners. System, 40, 48-63.
  • McBride, K. (2009). Social networking sites in foreign language classes: Opportunities for recreation. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 35-58). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
  • *Mills, N. (2011). Situated learning through social networking communities: The development of joint enterprise, mutual engagement, and a shared repertoire. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 345-368.
  • *Mitchell, K. (2012). A Social Tool: Why and how ESOL students use Facebook. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 471-493.
  • *Mompean, J. A. & Fouz- González, J. (2016). Twiter-based EFL pronunciation instruction. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 166-190.
  • O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved on 8 September 2017 from http://www.oreilly. com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
  • *Ota, F. (2011). A study of social networking sites for learners of Japanese. New Voices, 4, 144- 167.
  • *Ozdemir, E. (2017). Promoting EFL Learners’ intercultural communication effectiveness: a focus on Facebook. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 510-528.
  • Pew Research Center (2016). Social media update 2016. Retrieved on 1 June 2017 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/
  • *Reinhardt, J. & Ryu, J. (2013). using social network-mediated bridging activities to develop socio-pragmatic awareness in elementary Korean. International Journal of ComputerAssisted Language Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 18-33.
  • *Reinhardt, J. & Zander, V. (2011). Social networking in an intensive english program classroom: A language socialization perspective. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 326-344.
  • *Schreiber, B. R. (2015). “I am what I am”: Multilingual identity and digital translanguaging. Language Learning & Technology, 19(3), 69-87.
  • *Solmaz, O. (2017). Autonomous language learning on Twitter: Performing affiliation with target language users through #hashtags. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 204-220.
  • Thorne, S. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38-67.
  • Thorne, S. & Reinhardt, J. (2008). ‘Bridging activities,’ new media literacies and advanced foreign language proficiency. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 558-572.
  • *Vikneswaran, T. & Krish, P. (2016). Utilising social networking sites to improve writing: A case study with Chinese students in Malaysia. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(3), 287-300.
  • Zourou, K. & Loiseau, M. (2013). Bridging design and language interaction and reuse in Livemocha's Culture section. In M. Lamy & K. Zourou (Eds.), Social networking for language education (pp. 77-99). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillian.
Contemporary Educational Technology-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 2010
  • Yayıncı: Prof. Dr. Ali Şimşek
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The Effect of Augmented Reality Use on Achievement, Misconception and Course Engagement

Mustafa Sırakaya, Ebru Kılıç Çakmak

The Feasibility and Acceptance of Social Media Interventions in Higher Education Classrooms of Developing Nations with Special Reference to India

Mangala Vadivu Vivakaran, Neelamalar Maraimalai

Computers in Reading and Writing Skills through the Motivational Lens: SnagitTM, Screencast and E-mail Services

Adnan Yılmaz

A Critical Review of Research on Social Networking Sites in Language Teaching and Learning

Osman Solmaz

Investigation of Emerging Technology Usage Characteristics as Predictors of Innovativeness

Kerem KILIÇER, İbrahim ARPACI, Salih BARDAKCI

Impact of Virtual Laboratory on the Achievement of Secondary School Chemistry Students in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Collaborative Environments

Amosa Isiaka Gambari, Halima Kawu, Oluwole Caleb Falode