Çanakkale Umurbey Ovası topraklarının erozyona duyarlılığının mevsimsel değişimi

Toprağın erozyona duyarlılığı, yağış veya yüzey akışla toprağın parçalanmaya direncidir. ÇanakkaleUmurbey Ovası topraklarının erozyona duyarlılığını (K faktörü) ıslak eleme ve Wischmeier ve Smith (1978)abağının eşitliği kullanarak belirlemek için dört mevsimde 17 toprak serisinden yüz ey örnekleri alınmıştır. Kfaktörleri ve agregat stabiliteleri bakımından mevsimler arasındaki farkın karşılaştırılması tekrarlanan ölçümlüdeneme düzeninde varyans analizine göre yapılmıştır. Farklı mevsimlerde alınan toprakların agregat stabilitesideğerleri (%2.76 ile %4.35) düşük, K faktörü değerleri ise 0.20 ile 0.30 arasında (fazla aşınabilir topraklar)saptanmıştır. Toprakların agregat stabilitesi değerlerini yükseltmek ve K faktörü değerlerini düşürmek içintoprak koruyucu yöntem olarak bitkisel yöntemlere ağırlık verilmeli özellikle organik madde toprağa ilaveedilmelidir.

Seasonal change of erodibility in the soils of Çanakkale Umurbey Plain

Soil erodibility is the resistance of soil to detachment by rainfall impact or surface flow force. Surfacesoil samples were taken from 17 soil series in four seasons to determine the erosion sensitivity of the soils ofÇanakkale Umurbey Plain (K factor) by using wet sieving method and the equations of Wischmeier and Smith(1978) nomograph‟ s equation. Differences in K factors and aggregate stabilities by season were compared withrepeated measurement variance analysis. Aggregate stabilities of the soil sa mples taken at different seasonsvaried between 2.764.35% (low) and K factors varied between 0.200.30 (highly erodible). Vegetativemeasures and especially organic matter supplementation should be emphasized as a soil conservation method tofactor values.

___

  • Amezketa, E., 1999. Soil aggregate stability: a review. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 14: 83 –171.
  • Angers, D. A., 1992. Changes in soil aggregation and organic carbon under corn and alfalfa. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 56: 1244–1249.
  • Anonim, 2011. Çanakkale Meteoroloji Müdürlüğü iklim Verileri (yayınlanmamış).
  • Auerswald, K., Fiener, P., Martin, W., Elhaus, D., 2014. Use and misuse of the K factor equation in soil erosion modeling: An alternative equation for determining USLE nomograph soil erodibility values. Catena. 118: 220–225.
  • Bajracharya, R.M., Elliot, W. J., Lal, R., 1992. Interrill erodibility of some Ohio soils based on field rainfall simulation. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 56: 267 –272.
  • Bajracharya, R.M., Lal, R., Hall, G.F., 1998. Temporal variation in propert ies of an uncropped, ploughed Miamian soil in relation to seasonal erodibility. Hydrological Processes. 12: 1021 –1030.
  • Balcı, N., 1996. Toprak Koruması. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayın No: 3947, Orman Fakültesi Yayın No: 439. s. 490. İstanbul.
  • Barthes, B., Roose., E., 2002. Aggregate stability as an indicator of soil susceptibility to runoff and erosion; validation at several levels. Catena. 47: 133 –149.
  • Başkan, O., Dengiz, O., 2008. Comparision of traditional and geostatistical methods to estimate soil erodib ility factor. Arid Land Research and Management. 22: 29–45.
  • Bayramin, İ., Dengiz, O., Başkan, O., Parlak, M., 2003. Soil erosion assessment with ICONA Model Case Study: Beypazarı Area.TÜBİTAK Agriculture and Foresty. 27 (2): 105 –116.
  • Blackman, J.D., 1992. Seasonal variation in the aggregate stability of dowland soils. Soil Use and Management. 8: 142–150.
  • Bryan, R.B., 2000. Soil erodibility and processes of water erosion on hillslope. Geomorphology. 32: 385 –415.
  • Bryan, R.B., 1971. The influence of frost action on soil aggregate stability. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 54: 71 –85.
  • Bryan, R.B., 1996. Erosional response to variations in interstorm weathering conditions. In: Anderson, M.G., Brooks, S.A. (Eds.), Advances in Hillslope Proces ses: 589–612. Wiley, Chichester.
  • Bullock, M.S., Kemper., W.D., Nelson, S.D., 1988. Soi cohesion as affected by freezing, water content, time and tillage. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 52: 770–776.
  • Caron, J., Espindola, C.R., Angers, D.A., 1996. Soil structural stability during rapid wetting: Influence of land use on some aggregate properties. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 60: 901 –908.
  • Caron, J., Kay, B.D., Stone, J.A., 1992. Improvement of structural stability of a clay loam with drying. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 56: 1583 –1590.
  • Cebel, H., Akgül, S., Doğan, O., Elbaşı, F., 2013. Türkiye büyük toprak gruplarının erozyona duyarlılık “K” faktörleri. Toprak Su Dergisi. 2 (1): 30–45.
  • Coote, D.R., Malcolm–Mcgovern, C.A., Wall, G.J., Dickinson, W.T., Rudra, R.P., 1988. Seasonal variation of erodibility indices based on shear strength and aggregate stability in some Ontario soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 68: 405 –416.
  • Dimoyiannis, D., 2009. Seasonal soil aggregate stability variation in relation to rainfall and temperature under Mediterranean conditions. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 34: 860 –866.
  • Gee, G.W. , Bauder, J.W., 1986. Particle size analysis. In: Klute, A. (Ed), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Agronomy 9: 337 –382. Am. Soc. of Agron., Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Giovannini, G., Vallejo, R., Lucchesi, S., Bautista, S., Ciompi, S., Llovet, J., 2001. Effect of land use and eventual fire on soil erodibility in dry Mediterranean conditions. Forest Ecology and Management. 147: 15 –23.
  • Gollany, H.T., Schumacher, T.E., Evenson, P.D., Lindstrom, M.J., Lemne, G.D., 1991. Aggregate stability of an eroded and desurfaced typic Argiustoll. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 55: 811 –816.
  • Govers, G., Loch, R.J ., 1993. Effects of initial water content and soil mechanical strength on the runoff erosion resistance of clay soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 31: 549–566.
  • Haktanır, K., 1997. Doğal kaynak olarak toprak. İnsan Çevre Toplum (Editör: Ruşen Keleş ). sayfa 193 –225. İmge Kitapevi. Ankara.
  • Kemper, W.D., Rosenau, R.C., 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Klute, A. (Ed), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Agronomy 9: 425 –442. Am. Soc. of Agron., Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Klute, A. , Dirksen, C., 1986. Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity. In: Klute, A. (Ed), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Agronomy 9: 687 –732. Am. Soc. of Agron., Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Le Bissonais, Y., Blavet, D., Noni, G.D., Laurent, J.Y., Asseline, J., Chenu, C., 2007. Erodibility of Mediterranean vineyard soils: relevant aggregate stability methods and significiant soil variables. European Journal of Soil Science. 58: 188 –195.
  • Le Bissonnais, Y., Bruand, A., Jamagne, M., 1989. Laboratory experimental st udy of soil crusting: relations between aggregate breakdown mechanisms and crust structure. Catena. 16: 377 –392.
  • Legout, C., Leguedois, S., Le Bissonnais, Y., 2005. Aggregate breakdown dynamics under rainfall compared with aggregate stability measurements. European Journal of Soil Science. 56: 225 –237.
  • Lehrsch, G.A., Jolley, P.M., 1992. Temporal changes in wet aggregate stability. Transactions of the ASAE. 35: 493 –498.
  • Lehrsch, G.A., Sojka, R.E., Carter , D.L., Jolley, P.M., 1991. Freezing effects on aggrega te stability affected by texture, mineralogy, and organic matter. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 55: 1401 –1406.
  • Lynch, J.M., Bragg, E., 1985. Microorganisms and soil aggregate stability. Advances in Soil Sciences. 2: 133 – 171.
  • Miller, W.P., Bahar rudin, M.K., 1987. Interrill erodibility of highly weathered soils. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 18: 933 –945.
  • Mulla, D.J., Huyck, L.M., Reganold, J.P., 1992. Temporal variations in aggregate stability on conventional and alternative fa rms. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 56: 1620–1624.
  • Mutchler, C.K., Carter, C.E., 1983. Soil erodibility variation during the year. Transactions of ASAE. 26: 1102 – 1104.
  • Nelson, R. E., Sommers, L.E., 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page, A. L., R. H. Miller and Keeney, D. R. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Agronomy 9: 539–579. Am. Soc. of Agron., Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Oades, J.M., 1993. The role of biology in the formation, stabilization and degradation of soil structure. Geoderma. 56: 377 –400.
  • Özdemir, N., 1994.Toprağın strüktürel dayanıklılığının ve erozyona karşı duyarlılığının mevsimsel değişimi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 25 (3): 319–326.
  • Rauws, G., Auzet, A.V., 1989. Laboratory experiments on the effects of simulated wheel trackings on linear soil erosion. Soil and Tillage Research.19: 75 –81.
  • Rejman, J., Turski., R., Paluszek., J., 1998. Spatial and temporal variations in erodibility of loess soil. Soil and Tillage Research. 46: 61 –68.
  • Salvador Sanchis, M.P., Torri, D., Borselli, L., Poesen, J., 2007. Climate effects on soil erodibility. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 33: 1082–1097.
  • Shiel, R.S., Adey, M.A., Lodder, M., 1988. The effect of successive wet/dry cycles on aggr egate size distribution in a clay texture soil. Journal of Soil Science. 39: 71 –80.
  • Singh, M.J., Khera, K.L., 2010. Evaluation and estimation of soil erodibility by different techniques and their relationships. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World. 1 –6 August 2010, Brisbane, Australia. p. 37 –40.
  • Suwardji, P., Eberbach, P.L., 1998. Seasonal changes of physical properties of an Oxic Paleustalf (Red Kandosol) after 16 years of direct drilling or conventional cultivation. Soil and Tillage Research. 49: 65 –77.
  • Tang, K.L., 2004. Soil and Water Conservation in China. Science Press, Beijing.
  • Torri, D., Poesen, J., Borselli, L., 1997. Predictability and uncertainty of the soil erodibility factor using a global dataset. Catena. 31: 1 –22.
  • Torri, D., Poesen, J., Borselli, L., 2002. Corrigendum to “Predictability and uncertainty of the soil erodibility factor using a global dataset” [Catena 31 (1997) 1 –22] and to “Erratum to Predictability and uncertainty of the soil erodibility factor using a global dataset” [Catena 32 (1998) 307–308]. Catena. 46: 309–310.
  • Truman, G.C., Bradford, J.M., Ferris, J.E., 1990. Influence of antecedent water content and rainfall energy on soil aggregate breakdown. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 54: 1385 –1392.
  • Türkeş, M., Sümer, U.M., Demir, İ., 2002. Re –evaluation of trends and changes in mean, maximum and minimum temperatures of Turkey for the period 1929–1999. International Journal of Climatology. 22: 947 –977.
  • Utomo, W.H., Dexter, A.R., 1982. Changes in soil aggregate stability induced by wetting and drying cycles in non–saturated soil. Journal of Soil Science. 33: 623 –637.
  • Wang, B., Zheng, F., Römkens, M.J.M., Darboux, F., 2013. Soil erodibility for water erosion: A perspective and Chinese experiences. Geomorphology. 187: 1 –10.
  • Wischmeier, W.H., Smith, D.D., 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning. Agricultural Handbook No: 537. United States Department of Agricultural Science and Education Administration, Agricultural Research, Washington, DC. 58 pp.
  • Wischmeier, W.H., Mannering., J.V., 1969. Relation of soil properties to its erodibility. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings. 33: 131 –137.
  • Yiğini, Y., 2006. Çanakkale Umurbey Ovası Topraklarının Detaylı Toprak Etüt Haritalanması ve Arazi Değerlendirmesi. ÇOMÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Toprak Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 174 s.
  • Yiğini, Y., Ekinci, H., 2007. Umurbey Ovası topraklarının sorunları. Lapseki Sempozyumu 2007. s. 111 –115. 23 –24 Haziran, Çanakkale .
  • Young, R.A., Onstad, C.A., McCool, D.K., Benoit, G.R., 1983. Temporal changes in soil erodibility. Proc. Natural Resources Modelling Symp., October 16–21, Colorado. ARS 30, USA.
ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-8384
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Çanakkale ilinde toprak işlemenin zeytin sineği (bactrocera oleae gmelin, 1790, diptera:Tephritidae)'nin popülasyon yoğunluğuna etkisi

Burak POLAT, Ali ÖZPINAR, Sakine ÖZPINAR, Burak BÜYÜKCAN, Ali Kürşat ŞAHİN

Sofralık üzüm çeşidi kalemlerinin farklı süre ve sıcaklıklarda dep olanmasının üretim materyali üzerindeki etkileri

Sema TIRPANCI, Alper DARDENİZ

Kentsel koruma alanında bitkise l tasarım: Çanakkale (Türkiye) örneği

Füsun NEMUTLU ERDURAN

Türklerde deve güreşlerinin orta asya'dan anadolu'ya 4.000 yıllık geçmişi

Orhan YILMAZ, Mehmet ERTUGRUL, Yakup Erdal ERTÜRK

Kentsel atıksu i le sulanan toprakla rda bazı verimlilik özelliklerinin incelenmesi

Murat KUDAL, Nuray Mücellâ MÜFTÜOĞLU

1 Methylcyclopropane uygulamalarının ve farklı depolama sıcaklıklarının fuji kiku elma çeşidinin meyve kalitesine etkileri

Meryem Nur AYDIN, Fatih Cem KUZUCU

Çanakkale yöresinde yetiştirilen Deveci armut çeşidinde hasat sonrası 1 methylcyclopropane uygulamalarının depolama süresince kaliteye olan etkileri

Mustafa SAKALDAŞ

Çanakkale ili mısır ekim alanlarında zararlı olan mısır kurtları (sesamia nonagrioides lefebvre ve ostrinia nubilalis hübner)‟nın bazı biyolojik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi

Ali ÖZPINAR, Ufuk ÇEKMEZ

Çanakkale kent halkının rekreasyonel eğilim ve taleplerinin belirlenmesi

Alper SAĞLIK, Abdullah KELKİT

Kış Dinlenme İhtiyacı Yüksek Olan Kayısı Çeşitlerinin Güney Marmara Şartlarındaki Soğuklanma Sürelerinin, Tomurcuk Dökümleri, Çiçeklenme Periyodu ve Meyve Tutumuna Etkileri

Hakan ENGİN, Arda AKÇAL