İskemik kardiyomiyopatide cerrahi revaskülarizasyon tekniklerinin sonuçları

İskemik kardiyomiyopati, tedavisi zor ve prognozu kötü olan bir hasta grubunu teşkil etmektedir. Son yıllarda atan kalp tekniği ile ulaşılan başarılı sonuçların, bu grup hastalarda da elde edildiği bildirilmektedir. Ancak konvansiydnel yöntemlerdeki ciddi gelişmeler, iki grubun birbirine olan üstünlükleri konusundaki tartışmaların devam etmesine neden olmuştur. Bu çalışmada, her iki grubun erken ve geç dönem sonuçları karşılaştırılmıştır. Çalışma grubu 2001-2005 yılları arasında sol ventrikül ejeksiyon fraksiyonu% 30'un altında ve sol ventrikül dilatasyonu olan toplam 25 olguyu kapsamaktadır. Grup 1 atan kalp, Grup 2 ise kardiyopulmoner by-pass uygulanarak öpere edilen olgulardan oluşturulmuştur. Hastane mortalitesi Grup 2'deki tek olgu ile % 4 idi. Hastane ve yoğun bakım kalış süreleri Grup 1 'de daha düşük bulundu. Geç dönemde her iki gruptan 1 'er olgu kaybedildi. İstatistiksel anlamlılığa erişmemesine rağmen Grup 2'deki olgular, orta dönem takipleri sırasında fonksiyonel kapasite ve angina sınıflandırması açısından daha iyi konumda idiler. İskemik kardiyomiyopatili hastaların her iki yöntemle yapılan operasyonlarının gerek erken gerekse geç dönem sonuçları tatmin edicidir. Ancak bu çalışmada, atan kalp tekniğinin erken dönem sonuçları daha iyi iken, kardiyopulmoner by-pass grubunun geç dönem morbiditesi daha düşük bulundu.

Early and late outcomes of surgical revascularization procedures in ischemic cardiomyopathy

Management of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy is rather complicated and also has a poor prognosis. Recently, substantial success rates have also been reported with off-pump technique in these high risk patients. Nevertheless, owing to the great advances, that were achieved in traditional myocardial preservation and cardiopulmonary bypass techniques in the most recent years; a dilemma still remains regarding superiority of these techniques to each other in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Thus, we have compared early and late results of these two techniques in this study. Study group included 25 operated patients who have an left ventricle ejection fraction of less than 30 % and left ventricular dilatation between 2001 and 2005. Groups 1 and 2 included patients that were operated with "off pump" and "cardiopulmonary bypass" techniques, respectively. Hospital mortality was 4% with 1 patient dying in Group 2. Durations of intensive care unit and hospital stays were shorter in Group 1. Two patients (1 from each group)died in the late postoperative period. Although midterm comparisons of both functional and angina classifications revealed better results in Group 2 patients, statistical significance wasn't present. Early and late outcomes of surgical revascularization procedures were satisfactory with both techniques in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. In this study, short term results seemed better in "off pump" patients, while late morbidity rate was lower for "cardiopulmonary bypass" group.

___

  • 1 Warner CD, Weintraub WS, Craver JM, et al. Effect of cardiac surgery patient characteristics on patient outcomes from 1981 through 1995. Circulation 1997; 96: 1575-1579.
  • 2 Hartz AJ, Manley JC, Walker JA, et al. Trends during 25 years of coronary artery bypass operation at St. Luke's Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69: 829-833.
  • 3 Nashef SA, Rogues F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (Euro-SCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 16: 9-13.
  • 4 Tugtekin SM, Gulielmos V, Cichon R, et al. Off-pump surgery for anterior vessels in patients with severe dysfunction of the left ventricle. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 1034-1036.
  • 5 Eryılmaz S, Çorapcıoğlu T, Eren NT, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in the left ventricular dysfunction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21: 36-40.
  • 6 Yau TM, Fedak PW ,Weisel RD , et al. Predictors of operative risk for coronary bypass operations in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118: 1006-1013.
  • 7 Moshkovitz Y, Sternik L, Paz Y, et al. Primary coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass in impaired left ventricular function. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63(Suppl 6): 44-47.
  • 8 Veenhuyzen GD, Singh SN, McAreavey D, et al. Prior coronary artery bypass surgery and risk of death among patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 2001;104: 1489-1493.
  • 9 Wos S, Bachowski R, Ceglarek W, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass; initial experience of 50 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;14(Suppl 1): 38-42.
  • 10 Meharwal ZS,Trehan N. Off-Pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Heart Surgery Forum 2002; 5: 41-45.
  • 11 Nemec P, Bedanova H, Necas J, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction of 30% or less. Bratisl Lek Listy 2001;102: 15-21.
  • 12 Peric MS, Huskic R, Gradinac S, et al. The internal thoracic artery in myocardial revascularization in patients with severely depressed left ventricular function. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2001;129: 119-23.
  • 13 Luciani GB, Faggian G, Razzolini R, et al. Severe ischemic left ventricular failure: coronary operation or heart transplantation? AnnThorac Surg 1993; 55: 719-723.
  • 14 Louie HW, Laks H, Milgalter E, et al. Ischemic cardiomyopathy: Criteria for coronory revascularization and cardiac transplantation. Circulation 1991; 84 (Suppl 5): III290-295.
  • 15 Pasquet A, Williams MJ, Secknus MA, et al. Correlation of preoperative myocardial function, perfusion, and metabolism with postoperative function at rest and stress after bypass surgery in severe left ventricular dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 58-64.
  • 16 Schinkel AF, Poldermans D, Rizzello V, et al. Why do patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and a substantial amount of viable myocardium not always recover in function after revascularization? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127: 385-390.