Okul Öncesi Dönem Çocuklarının Sosyal Konumlarının Aile Değişkenlerine Bağlı Olarak İncelenmesi

Sosyal konunum gelişimi, okul öncesi dönemde başlar. Aile değişkenleri sosyal konum üzerinde etkili olabilmektedir. Bu araştırmanın amacı, 5-6 yaş çocuklarının sosyal konumlarının aile değişkenlerine (anne-baba eğitim düzeyi, annenin çalışması, baba mesleği, anne-baba yaşı, kardeşin olup olmaması, kardeş sayısı, kardeş cinsiyeti) bağlı olarak incelenmesidir. Araştırmada ilişkisel tarama yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklem grubunu Denizli’de okul öncesi eğitime devam eden 5-6 yaş grubundan 400 çocuk oluşturmuştur. Araştırmada veri toplama araçları olarak, Kişisel Bilgi Formu, Resimli Sosyometri Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Kişisel Bilgi Formu anaokulu öğretmenleri tarafından doldurulmuştur. Resimli Sosyometri Ölçeği anaokulu öğretmenleri tarafından çocuklara bireysel olarak uygulanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre, çocukların sosyal konumları anne-baba eğitim düzeyine, annenin çalışma durumuna, baba yaşına, kardeşin olup olmamasına ve kardeş sayısına göre farklılık göstermektedir. Ayrıca baba mesleği, anne yaşı ve kardeş cinsiyetinin sosyal konum üzerinde etkili olmadığı belirlenmiştir

Evaluation of Preschool Children’s Social Status in Relations to Family Variables

The development of social status starts in preschool period. Family variables may also influence on social status. The aim of this research is to evaluate of preschool children’s social status in relations to family variables (mother-father education levels, mother’s employment, father job, mother-father age, whether or not to have sibling, number of sibling, gender of sibling). A relational survey method was used in this study. The sample of the study consisted of 400 preschool children of 5-6 years old who were attending preschools located in Denizli. The Form of Personal Information Picture Sociometry Scale were used for data collecting in the study. Personal Information Form was completed by kindergarten teachers. Picture Sociometry Scale was applied to the children individually by the teachers. According to the results, significant differences was found in social status of children related to mothers-father education levels, mother’s employment, father age, whether or not to have sibling and number of sibling. Also, father job, mother age and gender of sibling not to be effective on social status of children.

___

  • Abramovitch, R., Corter, C., Pepler, D.J., Stanhope, L. (1986). “Sibling and Peer Interaction: A final follow-up and a comparison”. Child Development, 57: 217–229.
  • Asher, S.R., Singleton, L.C., Tinsley, B.R., Hymel, S. (1979). “A Reliable Sociometric Measure For Preschool Children”. Developmental Psychology, 15(4): 443-444.
  • Barnett, R.C., Baruch, G.K. (1987). “Determinants of Fathers’ Participation in Family Work”. Journal of Marriage and Family, 49: 29-40.
  • Barth, J.M., Archibald, A. (2003). “The Relation between Emotion Production Behavior and Preschool Social Behavior and Preschool Social Behavior: In the Eye of the Beholder”. Social Development, 12(1): 67-90.
  • Beyazkürk, D., Anlıak, ù., Dinçer, Ç. (2007). “Çocuklukta Akran İlişkileri ve Arkadaşlık”. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 26: 13-26.
  • Cillessen, A.H.N., Rose, A.J. (2005). “Understanding Popularity in the Peer System”. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2): 102-105.
  • Connor, D.F. (2004). Aggression and Antisocial Behavior in Children and Adolescents. The Guilford Press, New York.
  • Cotton, S., Antil, J.K., Cunningham, J.D. (1990). “The Work Attachment of Mothers With Preschool Children”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14: 255-270.
  • Çetin, F., Bilbay, A.A., Kaymak, D.A. (2002). Araştırmadan Uygulamaya Çocuklarda Sosyal Beceriler. Epsilon Yayıncılık Hizmetleri, İstanbul.
  • Davis-Kean, P. (2005). “The Influence of Parent Education and Family Income on Child Achievement: The Indirect Role of Parental Expectations and the Home Environment”. Journal of Family Psychology, 19: 294–304.
  • Dearing, E., McCartney, K., Taylor, B.A. (2001). “Change in Family Income Matters More for Children With Less”. Child Development, 72: 1779– 1793.
  • Diesendruck, G., Ben- Eliyahu, A. (2006). “The relationships among social cognition, peer acceptance and social behavior in Israeli kindergarteners”. The International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, 30(2): 137-147.
  • Dunn, J. (1988). “Sibling Influences on Child Development”. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 29(2): 119–127.
  • Dunn, J.C., Dunn, J.G.H., Bayduza, A. (2007). “Perceived Athletic Competence, Sociometric Status, and Loneliness Elementary School Children”. Journal of Sport Behavior, 30(3): 249-263.
  • Freeman, H., Newland, L.E., Coyl, D.D. (2008). “Father Beliefs as a Mediator Between Contextual Barriers and Father Involvement”. Early Child Development and Care, 178(7-8): 803-819.
  • Fussel, J.J., Macias, M.M., Saylor, C.F. (2005). “Social Skills and Behavior Problems in Children With Disabilities With and Without Siblings”. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 36(2): 227-241.
  • Gifford-Smith, M.E., Brownell, C.A. (2003). “Childhood Peer Relationships: Social Acceptance, Friendships and Peer Networks”. Journal of School Psychology, 41: 235-284.
  • Gülay, H. (2008). “5-6 Yaş Çocuklarına Yönelik Akran İlişkileri Ölçeklerinin Geçerlik Güvenirlik Çalışmaları ve Akran İlişkilerinin Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi”. Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul.
  • Gülay, H. (2010). Okul Öncesi Dönemde Akran İlişkileri. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • Hartup, W.W. (1989). “Social Relationship and Their Developmental Significiance”. American Psychologist., 44: 2.
  • Hisley, B.A. (1989). “Temperament and Mother-Child Interaction: The Relationship Between Goodness of Fit and a Child’s Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance”. The University of Texas, PhD Thesis, USA.
  • Howes, C., Tonyan, H. (1999). Peer Relations. (Eds. L. Balter ve C. S. Tamis-Le Monda). Child Psychology: A Handbook of Comtemporary Issues. Psychological Press, USA, pp. 318-335.
  • Larson, J., Lochman, J. Edward. (2002). Helping School Children Cope With Anger. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Matta, D.S., Knudson-Martin, C. (2006). “Responsivity: Couple Processes and The Construction of Fatherhood”. Family Processes, 45: 19–37.
  • Nagin, D.S., Tremblay, R.E. (2001). “Parental and Early Childhood Predictors of Persistent Physical Aggression in Boys From Kindergarten to High School”. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58: 389–394.
  • Parke, R.D., Simpkins, S.D., McDowell, D.J., Kim, M., Killian, C., Dennis, J., Flyr, M.L., Wild, M., Rah, Y. (2004). Relative Contributions of Families and Peers to Children’s Social Development. (Eds. P. K. Smith ve C. H. Hart) Blackwell Handbook Of Childhood Social Development. Blackwell Publishing, USA, pp. 156-177.
  • Pettit, G.S., Yu, T., Dodge, K.A., Bates, J.E. (2009). “A Development Process Analysis of Cross-Generational Continuity in Educational Attainment”. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 55(3): 250-284.
  • Polenski, T.A. (2001). Child Characteristics and Relations in The Family as Predictors of Peer Relationships. University of Pittsburgh, PhD Thesis, USA.
  • Shin, H. (1996). Korean- American Mothers’ Self Reported Parenting Patterns and Children’s Social Competence. Iowa State University, PhD Thesis, USA.
  • Stocker, C.M., Youngblade, L. (1999). “Marital Conflict and Parental Hostility: Links With Children’s Sibling and Peer Relationships”. Journal of Family Psychology, 13: 598–609.
  • ùentürk, S. (2007). 5-6 Yaş Çocuklarının Çalışan ve Çalışmayan Annelerinin Çocuk Yetiştirme Tutumları İle Bu Çocukların Sosyal-Duygusal Uyum Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması. Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.
  • Yu, J.J., Gamble, W.C. (2008). “Pathways of Influence: Marital Relationships and Their Association With Parenting Styles and Sibling Relationship Quality”. Journal of Child Family Studies. 17: 757-778.