Yenilenebilir Enerji ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: 1990-2017 Türkiye Örneği

Günümüzde enerji tüketiminin hızla artmasına paralel olarak alışılagelen enerji kaynaklarının sınırlı olması, ülkeleri enerji üretim politikalarını değiştirmeye ve alternatif enerji kaynaklarını kullanmaya teşvik etmiştir. Bu amaçla çalışmada Türkiye’de yenilenebilir enerji kullanımı ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki ve ilişkinin yönü, 1990-2017 dönemi için Bayer-Hanck eş bütünleşme testi ve Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik testi yardımıyla incelenmektedir. Analiz sonuçları, uzun dönemde değişkenlerin eşbütünleşik olduğunu ve yenilenebilir enerji kullanımındaki %1 birimlik artışın ekonomik büyümeyi %0.19 arttıracağını göstermiştir. Varlığı sınanan ilişkinin yönünün tespiti amacıyla yapılan nedensellik test sonuçlarına göre, ekonomik büyümeden yenilenebilir enerji kullanımına doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik vardır ve Türkiye’de koruma hipotezi geçerlidir.

The Relationship Between Renewable Energy and Economic Growth: 1990-2017 The Case Of Turkey

Along with the rapid rise in today’s energy consumption, the scarcity of conventional energy resources have encouraged countries to change their energy production policies and to use alternative energy resources. For this purpose, the relationship between the use of renewable energy and economic growth in Turkey and the direction of the relationship is examined over the period 1990-2017 via Bayer-Hanck co-integration test and Toda-Yamamoto causality test in the study. The analysis results indicate that the variables are cointegrated in the long-run, and a 1% rise in renewable energy use would increase the economic growth by 0.19%. According to the results of causality test which is performed in order to identify the direction of the relationship whose existence is also tested, there is a unilateral causality running from economic growth toward renewable energy use, and therefore, conservation hypothesis is valid for Turkey.

___

  • Aslan, A., & Öcal, O. (2016). The Role of Renewable Energy Consumption in Economic Growth: Evidence from Asymmetric Causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 953-959.
  • Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010). Renewable Energy Consumption and Growth in Eurasia. Energy Economics, 32(6), 1392-1397.
  • Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2011). The Renewable Energy Consumption–Growth nexus in Central America. Applied Energy, 88(1), 343-347.
  • Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2012). Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Consumption-Growth nexus: Evidence from a Panel Error Correction Model. Energy Economics, 34(3), 733-738.
  • Apergis, N., & Danuletiu, D. C. (2014). Renewable Energy and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Sign of Panel Long-run Causality. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 4(4), 578-587.
  • Ayman, G., Sezer, A., & Kılıçdağı, T. A. (2007). Avrupa Birliği’ne Katılım Sürecinde Türkiye’nin Komşu ve Çevre Ülkeler Politikası-Stratejik Yaklaşımlar. TÜSİAD Basın Bülteni, (07/36), 2.
  • Banerjee, A., Dolado, J., & Mestre, R. (1998). Error‐correction Mechanism Tests for Cointegration in a Single‐equation Framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(3), 267-283.
  • Bayer, C., & Hanck, C. (2013). Combining Non‐cointegration tests. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 34(1), 83-95.
  • Bayrak, M., & Esen, Ö. (2014). Türkiye’nin Enerji Açığı Sorunu ve Çözümüne Yönelik Arayışlar. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(3), 139-158.
  • Bhattacharya, M., Paramati, S. R., Özturk, I., & Bhattacharya, S. (2016). The Effect of Renewable Energy Consumption on Economic Growth: Evidence from Top 38 Countries. Applied Energy, 162, 733-741.
  • Boswijk, H. P. (1994). Testing for an Unstable Root in Conditional and Structural Error Correction Models. Journal of Econometrics, 63(1), 37-60.
  • Bulut, U., & Muratoğlu, G. (2018). Renewable Energy in Turkey: Great Potential, Low but Increasing Utilization, and an Empirical Analysis on Renewable Energy-Growth nexus. Energy Policy, 123, 240-250.
  • Çukurçayır, M. A., & Sağır, H. (2008). Enerji Sorunu, Çevre ve Alternatif Enerji Kaynakları. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (20), 257- 278.
  • Destek, M. A., & Aslan, A. (2017). Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Emerging Economies: Evidence from Bootstrap Panel Causality. Renewable Energy, 111, 757-763.
  • Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427-431.
  • Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1057-1072.
  • Doğan, E. (2016). Analyzing the Linkage between Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth by Considering Structural Break in Time-series Data. Renewable Energy, 99, 1126-1136.
  • Elliott, G., Jansson, M., & Pesavento, E. (2005). Optimal Power for Testing Potential Cointegrating Vectors with Known Parameters for Nonstationarity. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 23(1), 34-48.
  • Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı (2017). Dünya ve Türkiye Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Görünümü, 15, 1-83.
  • Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 251-276.
  • Evrendilek, F., & Ertekin, C. (2003). Assessing the Potential of Renewable Energy Sources in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 28(15), 2303-2315.
  • Farhani, S., Shahbaz, M., & Öztürk, I. (2014). Coal Consumption, Industrial Production and CO2 Emissions in China and India. Ipag Working Paper Series, No. 2014-225, 1-23.
  • Govindaraju, V. C., & Tang, C. F. (2013). The Dynamic Links between CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth and Coal Consumption in China and India. Applied Energy, 104, 310-318.
  • IEA (2009). World Energy Outlook. International Energy Agency. Paris, France.
  • Inglesi-Lotz, R. (2016). The Impact of Renewable Energy Consumption to Economic Growth: A Panel Data Application. Energy Economics, 53, 58-63.
  • Ito, K. (2017). CO2 Emissions, Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Consumption, and Economic Growth: Evidence from Panel Data for Developing Countries. International Economics, 151, 1-6.
  • Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254.
  • Kahia, M., Aïssa, M. S. B., & Lanouar, C. (2017). Renewable and Non-renewable Energy use-Economic Growth nexus: The Case of MENA Net Oil Importing Countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71, 127-140.
  • Karagöl, E. T., & Kavaz, İ. (2017). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Yenilenebilir Enerji. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Toplum Araştırmaları, Analiz, 197, 1-32.
  • Keleş, R., & Hamamcı, C. (2002). Çevrebilim. İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • Koçak, E., & Şarkgüneşi, A. (2017). The Renewable Energy and Economic Growth nexus in Black Sea and Balkan Countries. Energy Policy, 100, 51-57.
  • Korkmaz, Ö., & Develi, A. (2012). Türkiye’de Birincil Enerji Kullanımı, Üretimi ve Gayri Safi Yurt İçi Hasıla (GSYİH) Arasındaki İlişki. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(2), 1-25.
  • Kraft, J., & Kraft, A. (1978). On the Relationship between Energy and GNP. The Journal of Energy and Development, 401-403.
  • Kula, F. (2014). The Long-run Relationship between Renewable Electricity Consumption and GDP: Evidence from Panel Data. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 9(2), 156-160.
  • Lund, P. D. (2009). Effects of Energy Policies on Industry Expansion in Renewable Energy. Renewable Energy, 34(1), 53-64.
  • Marques, A. C., & Fuinhas, J. A. (2012). Is Renewable Energy Effective in Promoting Growth?. Energy Policy, 46, 434-442.
  • Menegaki, A. N. (2011). Growth and Renewable Energy in Europe: A Random Effect Model with Evidence for Neutrality Hypothesis. Energy Economics, 33(2), 257-263.
  • Öcal, O., & Aslan, A. (2013). Renewable Energy Consumption–Economic Growth nexus in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 494-499.
  • Phillips, P. C., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
  • Phillips, P. C., & Hansen, B. E. (1990). Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variables Regression with I (1) Processes. The Review of Economic Studies, 57(1), 99-125.
  • Rafindadi, A. A., & Öztürk, İ. (2017). Impacts of Renewable Energy Consumption on the German Economic Growth: Evidence from Combined Cointegration Test. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, 1130- 1141.
  • Salim, R. A., Hassan, K., & Shafiei, S. (2014). Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Activities: Further Evidence from OECD Countries. Energy Economics, 44, 350-360.
  • Shahbaz, M., Loganathan, N., Zeshan, M., & Zaman, K. (2015). Does Renewable Energy Consumption add in Economic Growth? An application of AutoRegressive Distributed Lag Model in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 576-585.
  • Soytaş, U., Sarı, R., & Ewing, B. T. (2007). Energy Consumption, Income, and Carbon Emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics, 62(3-4), 482- 489.
  • Soytaş, U., & Sarı, R. (2009). Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Carbon Emissions: Challenges faced by an EU Candidate Member. Ecological Economics, 68(6), 1667-1675.
  • Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical Inference in Vector Autoregressions with Possibly Integrated Processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250.
  • Tuğcu, C. T., Öztürk, İ., & Aslan, A. (2012). Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Relationship Revisited: Evidence from G7 Countries. Energy Economics, 34(6), 1942-1950.
  • Veziroğlu, T. N., & Şahin, S. (2008). 21st Century’s Energy: Hydrogen Energy System. Energy Conversion and Management, 49(7), 1820-1831.
  • Yıldırım, M., & Örnek, İ. (2007). Enerjide Son Seçim: Nükleer Enerji. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 32-44.