Ücret Teorileri ve Türkiye İşgücü Piyasaları İçin Uygulanabilir Bir Ücret Modeli Önerisi

Uluslararası emek piyasalarının genel olarak iki blok halinde kutuplaştığı kabul edilirse; ücretlerin iktisadi ve sosyal boyutlarının ele alınması isabetli olacaktır. Çalışanlarla işverenler arasında adeta bir mücadele haline bürünen bu ayrım, ücretlerin adil bir şekilde düzenlenmesi konusunda pek çok iktisatçıyı yeni formüller geliştirmeye itmiştir. Ne var ki, çalışma ekonomisi literatüründe tali aktörler olarak emek piyasalarında çalışan ve işverenler dışında devlet ve sendikaların varlığını kabul etmek gerekir. Bu tali aktörlerin emek piyasalarından paylarını almaları, ekonominin dengesini dörtlü bir saç ayağına oturtmaktadır. Bugüne kadar ortaya konulmuş olan doktriner açıklamalar ışığında, oluşabilecek çok boyutlu ve çok fonksiyonlu bir ücret modeli, emek piyasalarındaki bu dört aktör bazında ulaşılabilecek bir dengeye katkıda bulunacaktır.

Wage Theories and an Applicable Wage Model Proposal for Turkey's Labour Markets

Overall, if the labour markets would be accepted as two polarized blocks, surveying the economic and social dimensions of wages will be pertinent. It has become a confliction between employers and employes, shuttered in this distinction, a fair regulation of wages for many economists were forced to detect new formulas. However, in the labour economics literature such secondary actors employes and employers; have to accept the existence of government and unions. These secondary actors acquirement from labour markets seat the economic balance on a quartet trivet. So far, in observance of the doctrinal explanation that it can be obtained is a multi-dimensional and multifunctional wage model on the basis of four actors in the labour market can be reached will contribute to the balance.

___

  • Biçerli, M.K. (2013). Çalışma Ekonomisi. İstanbul: Beta Publication.
  • Billikopf, G. (2001). Incentive Pay (Pay for Performance). The Regends of the University of California. http://nature.berkeley.edu/ucce50/aglabor/7labor/08.htm (Accessed Date: October 13, 2014)
  • Calistri, A.D. & Galbraith, J.K. (2001). Wage Flexibility and Unemployment: A Panel Data Analysis of OECD Countries. UTIP Working Paper, http://utip.gov.utexas.edu/papers/utip_18.pdf (Accessed Date: May 02, 2014)
  • Ceylan, Z. (2009). Performansa Dayalı Ücretlendirme Modelleri ve Türkiye Açısından Bir Değerlendirme. Sayıştay Dergisi, (74-75), 45-72.
  • Clark, J.B. (1906). The Distribution of Wealth: A Theory of Wages, Interest and Profits. London: The Macmillan Company.
  • Chamberlain, N.W. & Cullen, D.E. (1971). The Labor Sector. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  • Daly, M.C., Hobijn, B. & Ni, T. (2013). The Path of Wage Growth and Unemployment. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Research, http://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/files/el2013-20.pdf (Accessed Date: May 19, 2014)
  • Davidson, J. (1899). The Bargain Theory of Wages. The Economic Journal, 9(34), 229-232.
  • Demirgil, H. (2010). Okun Yasası'nın Türkiye için Geçerliliğine Dair Ampirik Bir Çalışma. Akdeniz University Alanya Entrepreneur Faculty Issue. 2(2). 139- 151.
  • Ehrenberg, R.G. & Smith, R.S. (2012). Modern Labor Economics - Theory and Public Policy. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
  • Eraslan, M.T. & Tozlu, A. (2011). Kamu Yönetiminde Performansa Dayalı Ücret Sistemi. Sayıştay Dergisi, (81), 33-61.
  • Flatau, P. (2002). Hicks' The Theory of Wages: Its Place in the History of Neoclassical Distribution Theory. Murdoch University, Department of Economics, Working Papers, http://www.murdoch.edu.au/Schoolof.../187.pdf (Accessed Date: September 29, 2014)
  • Gürsel, S., Uysal, G. & Acar, A. (2013). Wage Rigidity and Informality in the Labor Market in Turkey. BETAM Research Brief, 13(152). http://www.irisfrance.org/docs/kfm_docs/observatoire-turquie/researchbrief152.pdf
  • (Accessed Date: May 01, 2014) Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L. & Thaler, R.H. (1986). Fairness as a Constraint on Prpfit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market. The American Economic Review, 76(4), 728-741.
  • Kargı, B. (2013). Ücret Yapışkanlığı Hipotezinin Test Edilmesi: Türkiye'de Asgari Ücret ve Büyüme Üzerine Zaman Serileri Analizi (2005-2012). Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, (2), 183-210.
  • Katz, L.F. (1986). Efficiency Wage Theories: A Partial Evaluation. NBER Working Papers, (1), 235-290.
  • Kaytancı, U. B. (2010). Etkin Ücret Teorisi ve Türkiye İmalat Sanayii Üzerine Uygulama. Ekonomik Yaklaşım Dergisi, 21(76), 93-118.
  • Kestane, D. (2003). Performansa Dayalı Ücret Sistemi ve Kamu Kesiminde Uygulanabilirliği. Maliye Dergisi, (142), 126-144.
  • Keynes, J.M. (2008). İstihdam Faiz ve Paranın Genel Teorisi. İstanbul: Kalkedon Publication.
  • Klau, F. & Mittelstädt, A. (1985). Flexibilité du Marché du Travail et Chocs Extérieurs Sur Lex Prix. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, http://www.oecdilibrary.org/docserver/download/5lgsjhvj8ds5.pdf?expires=1443881057&id =id&accname=guest&checksum=34ACF43E85FFE3F8DF546013FAD9D3 72 (Accessed Date: September 30, 2015)
  • Lazear, E.P. (2000). Performance Pay and Productivity. The American Economic Review, 90(5), 1346-1361.
  • Marshall, F.R., Cartter, A.M. & King, A.G. (1976). Labor Economics: Wages, Employment and Trade Unionism. Illinois, Homewood: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
  • McLaughlin, K.J. (1992). Rigid Wages?. Center for the Study of Economy and the State of Chicago, (77).
  • http://research.chicagobooth.edu/economy/research/articles/77.pdf (Accessed Date: March 20, 2014)
  • Peterson, W.C. (1994). Gelir İstihdam ve Ekonomik Büyüme. (T.Güllap, İnt.). Erzurum: Atatürk University Publication.
  • Phelps, E.S. (1968). Money-Wage Dynamics and Labor-Market Equilibrum. Journals of Political Economy. 76(4), 678-711.
  • Phelps, O.W. (1950). Introduction to Labor Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
  • Ricardo, D. (2007). Ekonomi Politiğin ve Vergilendirmenin İlkeleri. (T.Ertan, İnt.). İstanbul: Belge International Publication.
  • Shimer, R. (2004). The Consequences of Rigid Wages in Search Models. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge. Working Paper No:10326 http://www.nber.org/papers/w10326.pdf (Accessed Date: June 10, 2014)
  • Smith, A. (2006). Ulusların Zenginliği-I. (M.Saltoğlu, İnt.). Ankara: Palme Publication.
  • Solow, R. M. (1998). What is Labour-Market Flexibility? What is it Good for?, Proceeding of the British Academy, (97).
  • http://www.britac.ac.uk/pubs/src/keynes97/text1.cfm (Accessed Date: May 11, 2014)
  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1981). Alternative Theories of Wage Determination and Unemployment: The Efficiency Wage Model. Princeton University Discussion Paper, (95). http://www.princeton.edu/rpds/papers/WP_95.pdf (Accessed Date: June 13, 2014)
  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2013). The Price of Inequility. London: Penguin Books, Clays Ltd. St. Ives plc.
  • Üçışık, F. (2013). Asgari Ücret Sorunları ve Yansımaları. İstanbul: Ötüken Publication.
  • Wessels, W.J. (2004). The Effect of Minimum Wage On Covered Labor Demand. North Carolina State University, College of Management, Department of Economics, Working Papers.
  • http://public.econ.duke.edu/~staff/wrkshop_Wessels.pdf (Accessed Date: April 21, 2014)
  • Yellen, J. (1984). Efficiency Wage Models of Unemployment. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 74(2), 200-205.
  • Willis, R.J. (1986). Wage Determinants: A Survey and Reinterpretation of Human Capital Earnings Functions. University of Chicago and Economic Research Center, 523-602.