GRUP KARAR VERME PROJESİ SEÇİMİ: PAKİSTAN'DAN ÇOKLU BİR PROJE PERSPEKTİFİ

Karar verme, yönetimin temel işlevlerinden biridir. Stratejik kararlar vermek, organizasyonel etkinlik ve verimlilik elde etmek için önemlidir. Projelerin seçiminde, kuruluşların sınırlı kaynaklardan dolayı projelerini önceliklendirmesi gerekmektedir. Bu nedenle, organizasyona değer ve önemli etki yaratan projelerin seçimi, dinamik dış ortamlarda rekabet edebilmelerini ve amaç ve hedefleri karşılayabilmelerini sağlamak için çok önemlidir. Vaka çalışmasından elde edilen sonuç, Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHP) yönteminin, niteliklerin ve kriterlerin daha fazla açıklığa kavuşturulması gereken kaynakların tanımlanmasına önemli ölçüde katkıda bulunabileceğini ve aynı zamanda bir grup kararında sistematik bir analitik araç sağlayabileceğini göstermektedir. Bu yöntem, kurumun projelerini nicel bir karar destek aracı olduğu için belirli kriterlere göre önceliklendirmesine izin verir. Sonuç olarak, AHP’nin, karar vericilerin tüm gerçekleri dikkate almalarnıı, artıları ve eksileri değerlendirmelerini, ulaşmalarını, yeniden değerlendirmelerini ve kararlarını iletmelerini sağlayan en iyi ve etkili yöntem olduğu söylenebilmektedir.

PROJECT SELECTION FOR GROUP DECISION MAKING: A MULTIPLE PROJECT PERSPECTIVE FROM PAKISTAN

Decision making is one of the primary functions of management. Making strategic decisions are important toachieve organisational efficiency and effectiveness. In the selection of projects, it is necessary for organisations toprioritise their projects due to limited resources. Therefore, the selection of projects that bring value and substantial impacton the organisation is very important to ensure that they can compete in the dynamic external environment and meet thegoals and objectives. From the case study, the result suggests that the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method cancontribute significantly to the identification of sources that need further clarification of attributes and criteria and at thesame time it can provide a systematic analytical tool in making a group decision. This method allows the organisation toprioritize its projects based on certain criteria as it is a quantitative decision support tool. In conclusion, AHP is the bestand efficient method for decision makers to consider all facts, weigh the pluses and minuses, reach, reevaluate andcommunicate their decisions.

PDF

___

Ang. (2005). Using AHP in ERP software for group decision making. Unpublished technical report, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok.
Alexander, L. G., & McKeown, T. J. (1985). Case studies and theories of organizational decision making. Advances in Information processing in Organizations, 2, 2-58.
Al-Subhi, K. M. (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 19, 19-27.
Andrew, J. C., & Mahmoud, M. Y. (2003). Managing the project management process. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(1), 39-46.
Asaka, F. O. (2008). Projects selection and management implications in Kenyan local authorities. Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences,1(10), 65-75.
Athawale, M. C. (2009). Supplier selection using multi criteria decision making methods. Journal of Operations Management, 8, 41-60.
Aydin, E., & Rahman, M. (2017). Theoretical Perspectives to Diversity in Management Research. Journal of Management Research, 9(2), 160-170.
Bhushan, N., & Rai, K. (2004). Strategic decision making: Applying the analytic hierarchy process. New York: Springer.
Basheer, M. F., KhorramI, A. A. A., & Hassan, S. G. (2018). PATRONAGE FACTORS OF ISLAMIC BANKING SYSTEM IN PAKISTAN. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 22, 1-9.
Basheer, M., Ahmad, A., & Hassan, S. (2019). Impact of economic and financial factors on tax revenue: Evidence from the Middle East countries. Accounting, 5(2), 53-60.
Basheer, M. F. (2014). Impact of Corporate Governance on Corporate Cash Holdings: An empirical study of firms in manufacturing industry of Pakistan. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 7(4), 1371.
Burton, C., &Suedel, J. K. (2009). Comparison of the direct scoring method and multi criteria decision analysis for dredged material management decision making.
Charvat, J. (2003). Project management methodologies: Selecting, implementing, and supporting methodologies and processes for project. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Clifford, F. C., & Larson, W. E. (2003). Management process (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill Ltd.
Colin, O. B. (1985). A linear goal-programming model for public-sector project selection. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36(1). 13-23.
Costa, H. R., Barros, M. O., & Rocha, A. R. C. (2010). Software project portfolio selection: A modern portfolio theory based technique. Proceedings of the 22nd Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering Conference. San Francisco, EUA.
Eddie W. L. (2002). Analytical hierarchy process: A defective tool when used improperly. Measuring Business Excellence, 6, 33-37.
Haque, A. U., Aydin, E., and Uysal, E. (2017). A Comparison of Effectiveness of Global Leaders and Domestic Leaders in Electronic Retail Industry, The Global Journal of Management Research, 17(2), 11-20.
Imran, M., Aziz, A., & Hamid, S. (2016). Moderating role of environmental turbulence on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, business networks orientation, export market orientation and SMEs export performance: a research framework. Journal of Business Management, Commerce & Research, IV(XV).
Imran, M., Aziz, A., & Hamid, S. (2017a). The Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation, Business Networks Orientation, Export Market Orientation and SME Export Performance: A Proposed Research Framework. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(10), 230-248. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i10/3372
Imran, M., Aziz, A., & Hamid, S. (2017b). Total Quality Management, Export Market Orientation and Firm Export Performance: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(9), 591-601. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i9/3382
Imran, M., Aziz, A., & Hamid, S. (2017). Determinants of SME export performance. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 1(2), 39-58.
Imran, M., Aziz, A., Hamid, S., Shabbir, M., Salman, R., & Jian, Z. (2018). The mediating role of total quality management between entrepreneurial orientation and SMEsexport performance. Management Science Letters, 8(6), 519-532.
Imran, M., Hamid, S., & Aziz, A. (2018). The influence of TQM on export performance of SMEs: Empirical evidence from manufacturing sector in Pakistan using PLS-SEM. Management Science Letters, 8(5), 483-496.
Javed, M. A., & Basheer, M. F. (2017). Impact of external factors on bank profitability. EPRA International Journal of Research and Development, 2(5), 1-11.
Kendrick, J. D. (2007). Use of analytic hierarchy process for project selection. Six Sigma Forum Magazine, 5, 23-25.
Mahdi, K. A. (2002). Project selection by analytical hierarchy process: Case research-- Kuwait’s power station air pollution control. Management Institute, 3, 67-72.
Mazur, J. L. (2005). Quality infrastructure improvement using QFD to manage project priorities and project management resources. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22, 10-16.
Melone, N. P., & Wharton, T. J. (1984). Strategies for MIS project selection. Journal of Systems Management, 4, 26-33.
Morris, W. G., & Pinto, K. J. (2007). The Wiley guide to project organization and project management competencies. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
Motta, G. S., &Quintella R. H. (2012). Assessment of non-financial criteria in the selection of investment projects for seed capital funding: The contribution of scientometrics and patentometrics. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(3), 5-7.
Mullins, J. L. (2005). Management and organizational behavior. Essex: Pearson Educ. Ltd.
Palcic and Lalic. (2009). Analytical hierarchy process as a tool for selecting and evaluating projects. Journal of Management, 3, 45-53.
Pinto, J. (2007). Project management: Achieving competitive advantage. UK: Pearson Education.
Pinto, J. K., &Slevin, D.P. (1987). Critical factors in successful project implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34(1), 22-7.
Powers, Ruwanpura, Dolhan, and Chu. (2002). Simulation based project decision analysis tool. Journal of management project, 5, 32-40.
Ricardo, V. V. (2010). Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to select and prioritize projects in a portfolio. International Journal of Management, 12(2), 321-333.
Ricardo, V. V. (2011). Urgency: A critical factor in project planning. International Journal of Management, 14(3), 231-234.
Rubin, R. E. (1991). Human resource management in libraries: Theory and practice. New York: Neal-Schuman.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.
Swinscow TD, Campbell MJ. (2003). Statistics at square one. 10th ed. New Delhi, India: Viva Books Private Limited.
Triantaphyllou, E. (2002). Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative research. New York: Springer