COVİD-19 aşı pasaportlarına ilişkin algılar üzerine bir inceleme: Birproblem çözücü mü yoksa problem yapıcı mı?

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Twitter kullanıcılarının aşı pasaportlarına yönelik yaklaşımlarını anlamak, bu yaklaşımların nedenlerini açıklamak ve bu yaklaşımlar ile sürdürülebilirlik arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymaktır. Çalışmada bu amaçlara ulaşmak adına NVivo 12 programı ile 56 farklı hashtag'den 104 binden fazla tweet ve retweet elde edilmiştir. Bu verilerin analizi tümevarımsal analiz yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre zorunlu aşı pasaportlarına yönelik üç temel görüş bulunmaktadır. Bunlar; aşı pasaportlarını tamamiyle destekleyenler, aşı pasaportlarını tamamiyle reddedenler ve bu pasaportların zorunlu olmasını reddedenlerdir. Aşı pasaportlarını tamamiyle destekleyenler; aşıların insan sağlığına olumlu etkisi, sosyal yaşama geri dönme arzusu ve ekonomiyi yeniden canlandırma isteğiyle bu yaklaşımı sergilemektedir. Aşı pasaportlarını tamamiyle reddedenler ve bu pasaportların zorunlu olmasını reddedenler ise aşı tereddüdü, eşitlik ve ayrımcılık kaygıları, özgürlük endişeleri ve yeni bir dünya düzeni yaratıldığına dair inançlar nedeniyle bu yaklaşımları sergilemektedir. Araştırmadaki önemli sonuçlardan biri de sürdürülebilirlikle ilgilidir. Bu sonuca göre aşı pasaportlarını destekleyenler ekonomik ve sosyal sürdürülebilirlik üzerinde dururken; desteklemeyenler sosyal sürdürülebilirlik boyutunu reddederek bu uygulamaların zorunlu olmasının nedenini tümüyle ekonomik sürdürülebilirlikle ilişkilendirmektedir. Onlara göre hükümetler, otoriteler ve büyük ticari işletmeler karlılığı halk sağlığının üzerinde tutmaktadır.

A review on perceptions of the COVID-19 vaccine passports: A problem solver or a problem maker?

The study aims to understand the approaches of Twitter users toward vaccination passports, explain the reasons for these approaches, and reveal the relationship between these approaches and sustainability. More than 104 thousand tweets and retweets from 56 different hashtags were obtained with the NVivo 12 program to achieve these goals. The analysis of these data was carried out with the inductive analysis method. According to the research results, there are three basic views on compulsory vaccination passports. These; Those who fully support vaccination passports, reject vaccination passports altogether, and reject mandatory passports. Those who fully support their vaccination passports; demonstrate this approach with the positive effect of vaccines on human health, the desire to return to social life, and the desire to revive the economy. Those who reject vaccination passports entirely and those who refuse to make these passports compulsory exhibit these approaches because of their vaccine hesitation, concerns about equality and discrimination, concerns about freedom, and the belief that new world order has been created. One of the actual results of the research is related to sustainability. According to this result, while those who support vaccination passports focus on economic and social sustainability, those who accept the social sustainability dimension associate the reason why these practices are compulsory with economic sustainability. According to them, governments, authorities and large commercial enterprises place profitability above public health.

___

  • Airports Council International (ACI), (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on the airport business and the path to recovery. https://aci.aero/2021/03/25/the-impact-of-covid-19-on-the-airport-businessand-the-path-to-recovery/ (Accessed 10 September 2021).
  • Allena, M., Guidi, S., Reyes, R., Romano, A., & Sotis, C. (2021). How can the public be persuaded to accept vaccine passports?. LSE COVID-19 Blog. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/111659/1/covid19_2021_07_19_how_can_the_public_be_persuaded_to_ac cept_vaccine.pdf (Accessed 5 October 2021).
  • Asif, M., Searcy, C., Zutshi, A., & Ahmad, N. (2011). An integrated management systems approach to corporate sustainability. European business review.
  • Baumgartner, R. J., & Ebner, D. (2010). Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sustainable development, 18(2), 76-89.
  • Bruns , A., & Stieglitz, S. (2013). Towards more systematic Twitter analysis: metrics for tweeting activities. International journal of social research methodology, 16(2), 91-108.
  • Chen, L. H., Petersen, E., Blumberg, L., Piyaphanee, W., & Steffen, R. (2021). COVID-19 health passes: current status and prospects for a global approach. Journal of Travel Medicine, 28(7), taab118.
  • Cope, K. L., Somin, I., & Stremitzer, A. (2021). Vaccine Passports as a Constitutional Right. George Mason Legal Studies Research Paper No. LS, 21-11.
  • Cope, K., & Stremitzer, A. (2021). Governments Are Constitutionally Permitted to Provide “Vaccine Passports”—Some May Also Be Constitutionally Obligated to Do So.
  • Davidson S. (2021). The world wants to reopen: will vaccine passes be the key?. Biometric Technology Today. (6):5-7. doi:10.1016/S0969-4765(21)00070-9
  • Go, A., Huang, L., & Bhayani, R. (2009). Twitter sentiment analysis. Entropy, 17, 252.
  • Gostin, L. O., Cohen, I. G., & Shaw, J. (2021). Digital Health Passes in the Age of COVID-19: Are “Vaccine Passports” Lawful and Ethical?. JAMA, 325(19), 1933-1934.
  • Guidi, S., Romano, A., & Sotis, C. (2021). Depolarizing the COVID-19 Vaccine Passport. Yale Law Journal, Forthcoming.
  • Hall, M. A., & Studdert, D. M. (2021). “Vaccine Passport” Certification—Policy and Ethical Considerations. New England Journal of Medicine.
  • International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), (2021). Effects of Novel Coronavirus (COVID‐19) on Civil Aviation: Economic Impact Analysis Montréal, Canada 7 September 2021 Economic Development – Air Transport Bureau. https://www.icao.int/sustainability/Pages/EconomicImpacts-of-COVID-19.aspx (Accessed 1 October 2021).
  • Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Corporate sustainability: A strategy?. Harvard Business School Accounting & Management Unit Working Paper, (19-065).
  • Jecker, N. S. (2021). Vaccine passports and health disparities: a perilous journey. Journal of medical ethics. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107491
  • Kuhlman , T., & Farrington, J. (2010). What is sustainability?. Sustainability, 2(11), 3436-3448. Kumar, A., & Sebastian, T. M. (2012). Sentiment analysis on twitter. International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI), 9(4), 372.
  • Kurt, Y. (2021). Diffusion of the Airport Health Accreditation Program in the COVID-19 period: An Assessment with Institutional Logic And Legitimacy Approach. Journal of Air Transport Management, 94, 102078.
  • Linnenluecke , M. K., Russell, S. V., & Griffiths, A. (2009). Subcultures and sustainability practices: The impact on understanding corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the environment, 18(7), 432-452
  • Linvill, D. L., McGee, S. E., & Hicks, L. K. (2012). Colleges’ and universities’ use of Twitter: A content analysis. Public relations review, 38(4), 636-638.
  • Lo , S. F., & Sheu, H. J. (2007). Is corporate sustainability a value‐increasing strategy for business?. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 345-358.
  • Magis, K. (2010). Community resilience: An indicator of social sustainability. Society and Natural Resources, 23(5), 401-416.
  • Mithani, S. S., Bota, A. B., Zhu, D. T., & Wilson, K. (2021). A scoping review of global vaccine certificate solutions for COVID-19. Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-334258/v2
  • Naderi, P. T., Asgary, A., Kong, J., Wu, J., & Taghiyareh, F. (2021). COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Information Diffusion: An Agent-based Modeling Approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01182.
  • Nalubola, S. (2021). Vaccine Passports and COVID-19: Ethical, Scientific, and Practical Considerations. Roundtable J. Health Policy, 3.
  • Nga, L. M. P. T., & Nhung, D. D. H. (2021). Comply Human Rıght Law When Implementıng Vaccıne Passport. International Journal of Innovation Scientific Research and Review. Vol. 03, Issue, 06, pp.1339-1342,
  • Osama , T., Razai, M. S., & Majeed, A. (2021). Covid-19 vaccine passports: access, equity, and ethics.
  • Pavli, A., & Maltezou, H. C. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine passport for a safe resumption of travel. Journal of Travel Medicine.
  • Satria, F. B., Khalifa, M., Rabrenovic, M., & Iqbal, U. (2021). Can digital vaccine passports potentially bring life back to “true-normal”?. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 1, 100011.
  • Saunila , M., Nasiri, M., Ukko, J., & Rantala, T. (2019). Smart technologies and corporate sustainability: The mediation effect of corporate sustainability strategy. Computers in Industry, 108, 178-185.
  • Schlagenhauf, P., Patel, D., Rodriguez-Morales, A., Gautret, P., Grobusch, M. P., & Leder, K. (2021). Variants, vaccines and vaccination passports: Challenges and chances for travel medicine in 2021. Travel medicine and infectious disease.
  • Seira, C. C. (2021). The vaccine-condition or vaccination passport and its eventual fit into a broad recommended vaccination framework against COVID-19. Vacunas (English Edition).
  • Sotis, C., Allena, M., Reyes, R., & Romano, A. (2021). Covid-19 Vaccine Passport and International Traveling: The Combined Effect of Two N Americans’ Support for the Pass. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(16), 8800.
  • Terpstra, T., Stronkman, R., de Vries, A., & Paradies, G. L. (2012, April). Towards a realtime Twitter analysis during crises for operational crisis management. In Iscram.
  • Thomas, B., Flood, C. M., Krishnamurthy, V., Tanner, R., & Wilson, K. (2021). Vaccine Ins and Outs: An Exploration of the Legal Issues Raised by Vaccine Passports. Vaccine.
  • Vuong , Q. H., Vuong, T. T., Ho, T. M., & Nguyen, H. V. (2017). Psychological and socio-economic factors affecting social sustainability through impacts on perceived health care quality and public health: The case of Vietnam. Sustainability, 9(8), 1456.
  • Wang, M., Kunasekaran, P., & Rasoolimanesh, S. M. (2021). What influences people’s willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine for international travel?. Current Issues in Tourism, 1-6.
Business and Management Studies: An International Journal-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-2586
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: ACC Publishing