COEXISTENCE OF PRIVATE FIRMS AND OPEN SOURCE FIRMS UNDER SPILLOVERS AND CONSUMER BIAS

Açık kaynak teknolojileri özel üretim teknolojilerinden önemli bir sapma olarak görülmekteler. Bazı piyasalarda hem özel üretim yapan firmaların hem de açık kaynak firmaların aynı anda var olduğunu görmkteyiz. Bu çalışmada böyle bir ortak var olmanın hangi şartlarda gerçekleşebileceğini inceliyoruz. Açık kaynak teknolojisinin üretiminde yayılma etkisi barındıran ve tüketicilerin de özel firma tarafından üretilen ürüne pozitif önyargı besledikleri sade ve çözülebilir bir oyun teorisi modeli kullanıyoruz. Han gi şartlar altında, dengede, özel firmanın ve açık kaynak firmasının piyasa talebini paylaşabileceklerini analiz ediyoruz. Yüksek pozitif tüketici önyargısı varken her iki firmanın piyasada aynı anda var olamayacağını, ancak pozitif önyargı etkisi görece düşük ve yayılma etkisinin çok güçlü olmadığı durumlarda ise bu iki firmanın aynı anda piyasada var olabileceğini gösteriyoruz

ÖZEL VE AÇIK KAYNAK FİRMALARIN YAYILMA ETKİSİ VE TÜKETİCİ ÖNYARGISI ALTINDA BİR ARADA BULUNMASI

Open source technologies have been an important divergence from the private production, and some mark ets have accommodated both open source firms and private firms. We explore the conditions under which such a coexistence of both type of firms can be seen. Through a simple and tractable game theoretical model, with spillovers on the open source production and positive consumer bias for the privately produced good, we analyze the conditions for which, in the equilibrium, a private firm and an open source firm share the mark et. We find that for large enough consumer bias, the two types cannot coexist, however wh en the consumer bias is relatively low and the spillover effect is not too strong, then we get a coexistence result

___

  • Admati, A. R. and Perry, M. (1991), “Joint Projects without Commitment”, The Review of Economic Studies, 58, 259-276.
  • Aghion, P., Harris, C., Howitt, P. and Vickers, J. (2001), “Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation”, Review of Economic Studies, 68, 467-492.
  • Akbulut, S and Yılmaz, M. (2015), “A Dynamic Model of Mixed Duopolistic Competition: Open Source vs. Proprietary Innovation”, Theoretical Economics Letters, 5, 730-738.
  • Aoki, R. (1991), “R&D Competition for Product Innovation: An Endless Race”, The American Economic Review, 81, 252-256.
  • Atal, V. and Shankar, K. (2014), “Open Source Software: Competition with A Public Good”, Atlantic Economic Journal, 42(3), 333-345.
  • Athey, S. and Ellison, G. (2014), “Dynamics of Open Source Movements”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 23(2), 294-316.
  • Bitzer, J. (2004), “Commercial versus open source software: the role of product hetero- geneity in competition”, Economic Systems, 28, 369-381.
  • Bitzer, J., Schrettl, W. and Schröder, P. J. H. (2007), “Intrinsic motivation in open source software development”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 35, 160-169.
  • Casadesus-Masanell, R. and Ghemawat, P. (2006), “Dynamic Mixed Duopoly: A Model Motivated by Linux vs. Windows”, Management Science, 52(7), 1072-1084.
  • Casadesus-Masanell, R. and Llanes, G. (2011), “Mixed Source”, Management Science, 57(7), 1212-1230.
  • Caulkins, J. P., Feichtinger, G., Grass, D., Hartl, R. F., Kort, P. M., and Seidl, A. (2013), “When to make proprietary software open source”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37, 1182-1194.
  • Economides, N. and Katsamakas, E. (2006), “Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry”, Management Science, 52(7), 1057-1071.
  • Erkal, N. and Minehart, D. (2014), “Optimal Technology Sharing Strategies in Dynamic Games of R&D”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 23(1), 149-177.
  • Fershtman, C. and Markovich, S. (2010), “Patents, imitation and licensing in an asymmet- ric dynamic R&D race”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(2), 113-126.
  • Grossman, G. M. and Shapiro, C. (1987), “Dynamic R&D Competition”, The Economic Journal, 97, 372-387.
  • Haruvy, E., Sethi, S. P. and Zhou, J. (2008),“Open Source Development with a Commer- cial Complementary Product or Service”, Production and Operations Management, 17(1), 29-43
  • Hasnas, I., Lambertini, L. and Palestini, A. (2014), “Open Innovation in a dynamic Cournot duopoly”, Economic Modelling, 36, 79-87.
  • Jaisingh, J, See-To, E. W. K. and Tam K. Y. (2014), “The Impact of Open Source Software on the Strategic Choices of Firms Developing Proprietary Software”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 241-276.
  • Johnson, J. P. (2002), “Open Source Software: Private Provision of a Public Good”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 11(4), 637-662.
  • Kort, P. M. and Zaccour, G. (2011), “When Should a Firm Open its Source Code: A Strategic Analysis”, Production and Operations Management, 20(6), 877-888.
  • Lerner, J., Pathak, P. A. and Tirole, J. (2006), “The Dynamics of Open-Source Contrib- utors”, The American Economic Review, 96(2), 114-118.
  • Lerner, J. and Tirole, J. (2005), “The Economics of Technology Sharing: Open Source and Beyond”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(2), 99-120.
  • Lerner, J. and Tirole, J. (2002), “Some Simple Economics of Open Source”, Journal of Industrial Economics , 50(2), 197-234.
  • Li, C. and Ji, C. (2010), “Innovation, licensing, and price vs. quantity competition”, Economic Modelling, 27, 746 - 754.
  • Llanes, G. and de Elejalde, R. (2013), “Industry equilibrium with open-source and pro- prietary firms”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31, 36-49.
  • Marx, L. E. and Matthews, S. A. (2000), “Dynamic Voluntary Contribution to a Public Project”, The Review of Economic Studies, 67, 327-358.
  • Modica, S. (2012), “Open Source without Free-Riding”, Economia politica, 2, 247-260.
  • Mustonen, M. (2005), “When Does a Firm Support Substitute Open Source Program- ming?”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(1), 121-139.
  • Reisinger, M., Ressner, L., Schmidtke, R. and Thomes, T. P. (2014), “Crowding-in of com- plementary contributions to public goods: Firm investment into open source software”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 106, 78-94.
  • Suh, J. and Yılmaz, M. (2017), “Economics of Open Source Technology: A Dynamic Approach”, working paper.
  • Yıldırım, H. (2006), “Getting the ball rolling: Voluntary contributions to a large-scale public project”, Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8(4), 503-528.
Business and Management Studies: An International Journal-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-2586
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: ACC Publishing
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

İDEOLOJİNİN İDEALİZASYONU İLE KAPİTALİZMİN ÇEKİCİLİĞİ VE ZORLAMALARI ARASINA SIKIŞAN GİRİŞİMCİLER: TURİZM GİRİŞİMCİLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

ALİ TAŞ, KAZIM OZAN ÖZER, Mustafa AYHAN

ENGAGING STUDENTS THROUGH EVENT MARKETING: AN EXAMPLE OF UNIVERSITY ENTREPRENEURSHIP EVENT

Cansu GÖKMEN KÖKSAL, EBRU TÜMER KABADAYI, Alev KOÇAK ALAN

ALGILANAN ÖRGÜTSEL DESTEĞİN ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE ÖRGÜTSEL GÜVENİN ARACILIK ROLÜ

OZAN BÜYÜKYILMAZ, YAHYA FİDAN

COST ANALYSIS OF CORONARY INTERVENTIONS: TRANSRADIALOR TRANSFEMORAL?

Demet GOKMEN KAVAK, İSMAİL AĞIRBAŞ, YÜCEL BALBAY, KEZİBAN AVCI

TÜRKİYE’DE ORGAN NAKLİNE YÖNELİK POLİTİKALARIN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

YASEMİN AKBULUT, FATİH DURUR

KORONER GİRİŞİMLERİN MALİYET ANALİZİ: TRANSRADIAL MİTRANSFEMORAL Mİ?

Keziban AVCI, Yücel BALBAY, İsmail AĞIRBAŞ, Demet GOKMEN KAVAK

A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPLORATION OF SAFETY HAZARDS RELATED TO THE OUTSOURCING OF AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE

Hakkı BAĞAN, ENDER GEREDE

İNTERMODAL TAŞIMACILIK: TERCİH NEDENLERİ VE AVRUPA-TÜRKİYE ARASINDAKİ PROBLEMLER

Bengü SEVİL OFLAÇ, Balca Berfin UYGUÇ

BORSA İSTANBUL KURUMSAL YÖNETİM ENDEKSİNDEKİ ŞİRKETLERİN WEB TABANLI YATIRIMCI İLİŞKİLERİ YÖNETİMİ ETKİNLİKLERİNİN BORSA İSTANBUL 100 ENDEKSİNDEKİ ŞİRKETLER ARASINDAKİ KONUMU

FATİH TEMİZEL, ETHEM ESEN, Cem ULUCAN

EXPLANATION OF INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC JOB SATISFACTION VIA MIRROR MODEL

ÇETİN BEKTAŞ